Skip to content

· Private foundation

Steadfast Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$391k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$568kEducation$460kCommunity Improvement$201kHealth$73kInternational$70kHuman Services$55kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kPhilanthropy$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $256k
$10,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$150,000
COVENANT$106,000
REGENT PREP SCHOOL OF OKLAHOMA$45,333
CROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT$25,000
REFORMED YOUTH MINISTRIES$25,000
SISTER INDIA$10,000
LILYFIELD$10,000
Individual grant recipient$7,280
LIFESONG FOR ORPHAN$5,000
SEED COMPANY BIBLE TRANSLATION$5,000
LIFESPRING$2,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $256k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JOHN 316 MISSION: $5k → 14%LILYFIELD: $5k → 16%JOHN 316 MISSION: $10k → 15%CROSSRIVER COMMUNITY IMPACT: $56k → 15%CROSSRIVER COMMUNITY IMPACT: $50k → 15%CROSSRIVER COMMUNITY IMPACT: $25k → 15%CROSSRIVER COMMUNITY IMPACT: $25k → 15%CROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT: $25k → 15%CROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT: $20k → 15%LILYFIELD: $10k → 15%LILYFIELD: $10k → 15%LILYFIELD: $10k → 15%LILYFIELD: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
CA
TN
NC
OK
LA
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 13 repeat orgs$420k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
8

Total granted

$1.3M
$415k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+56%

Still filing today

46%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalEducationPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LC
    LIFESPRING COMMUNITY HEALTH
    2× · 2021–2022 · $61k · revenue +53%
  • LI
    LILYFIELD INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $40k · revenue +18%
  • LF
    LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $10k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • CC
    COVENANT COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue +27%
  • NC
    NEW CITY FELLOWSHIP INC
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • SC
    SEED COMPANY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $48k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Christian Foundation -- Wisconsin Inc

Equipping followers of christ to give wisely to advance his kingdom by inspiring biblical stewardship and generosity.

Religion
2
Christian Living Communities

Christian living communities enriches the quality and dignity of life for older adults through services and care that reflect christian love, respect, and compassion toward each individual.

Housing & Shelter
3
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
4
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
5
Landmark Christian School

Landmark christian school partners with christian families by equipping college-bound students to embrace a christ-centered worldview, grow as servant leaders, and steward god's unique purpose for their lives.

—
6
North Texas Christian Foundation

National Christian Foundation North Texas (NCFNT) was created to facilitate smarter Christian giving with sophisticated charitable techniques.

Philanthropy
7
Covenant Christian Inc

The mission is to glorify god by partnering with christian families to provide an academically excellent education that approaches every discipline from a christ-centered, biblical perspective.

Education
8
Covenant Christian Schools of Indianapolis Inc

The school's objective is to provide an excellent, christ-centered education, equipping students for a life of scholarship, leadership, and service.

Education
9
Carolina College of Biblical Studies

Carolina college of biblical studies exists to disciple christ-followers, through biblical higher education, for a lifetime of effective servant leadership.

Education
10
Charlotte Christian College & Theological Seminary

To educate, train, and develop ministers, evangelists, missionaries, and other people who are going to enter the Christian ministry. Educate ministers and missionaries to serve the Lord.

Religion
11
Colleyville Covenant Christian

The mission is to provide a biblically based classical college preparatory education that inspires a passion for excellence a heart of grace and the character of Christ.

Education
12
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifesong for Orphans Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sister India Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $302,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOVENANT: $213,700 · OtherCOVENANTREGENT PREP SCHOOL OF OKLAHOMA: $190,333 · OtherREGENT PREP SCHOOL OF OKLAHOMARIVEROAKS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF TULSA PCA INC: $134,000 · OtherRIVEROAKS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF TULSA PCA INCREFORMED YOUTH MINISTRIES: $75,000 · OtherREFORMED YOUTH MINISTRIESNEW CITY FELLOWSHIP INC: $50,000 · OtherSEED COMPANY INC: $47,780 · Other+6 more: $72,680 · Other+6 moreCOVENANT COLLEGE: $250,000 · EducationCOVENANT COLLEGEREGENT PREPARATORY SCHOOL OF OKLAHOMA INC: $20,000 · EducationREGENT PREPARATOR…CROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT INC: $201,000 · Human ServicesCROSSOVER COMMUN…LILYFIELD INC: $40,000 · Human ServicesLILYFIELD INCJOHN 316 MISSION: $15,000 · Human ServicesJOHN 316 MISSIONSISTER INDIA LTD: $60,000 · InternationalLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC: $10,000 · InternationalLIFESPRING COMMUNITY HEALTH: $61,000 · HealthILLUMINATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $27,379 · PhilanthropyNORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,085,493Education$270,000Human Services$256,000International$70,000Health$61,000Philanthropy$32,379

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOVENANT COLLEGE: $250,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT INC: $201,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetLIFESPRING COMMUNITY HEALTH: $61,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetSISTER INDIA LTD: $60,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetLILYFIELD INC: $40,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetILLUMINATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $27,379 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREGENT PREPARATORY SCHOOL OF OKLAHOMA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COVENANT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds CROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFESPRING COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds SISTER INDIA LTD ↗
  • Who funds LILYFIELD INC ↗
  • Who funds ILLUMINATIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds REGENT PREPARATORY SCHOOL OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHN 316 MISSION ↗
  • Who funds LIFESONG FOR ORPHANS INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Tulsa Community FoundationOK16.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Tulsa Community Foundation · Stitt Charitable Foundation · Servant Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Steadfast Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Steadfast Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Steadfast’s filings →

    More from the funding graph