· Private foundation
Stitt Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $46k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $53k
- $250k+1 grant · $387k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NORTHCHURCH (OKC) | $386,583 |
| Individual grant recipient | $26,300 |
| SCOTT & KIM VERPLANK FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| MERCY MULTIPLIED | $12,000 |
| CRU | $6,500 |
| COLLEGE GOLF FELLOWSHIP | $6,000 |
| BIRTHRIGHT LIVING LEGACY | $5,000 |
| RHONDA BEAR MINISTRIES | $5,000 |
| YOUR ONE DEGREE | $5,000 |
| NOVO | $5,000 |
| FAVOR INTERNATIONAL | $5,000 |
| OKLAHOMA CAPITOL CULTURE | $5,000 |
| REFINED SILVER GOLF TOURNAMENT | $1,500 |
| COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL | $1,032 |
| SOJOURN CHURCH | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $98k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
30 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CGCollege Golf Fellowship4× · 2019–2024 · $52k · revenue +117%
- YAYOD ASSOCIATES INC4× · 2019–2024 · $42k · revenue +27%
STAND IN THE GAP INC3× · 2020–2022 · $34k · revenue +45%
Funded once
- IFILLUMINATIONS FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2021 · $240k · revenue +18%
- DCDESTINY CHURCHone grant, 2021 · $110k
- VCVICTORY CHRISTIAN CENTER OKLAHOMA CITY INCone grant, 2021 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Evangelistic preaching the good news of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Missionary and support of missionaries at home and abroad. Praying and counseling with Gods people both at home and in the field. Benevolence to needy.
North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…
The Good OKC was created to equip and empower the people of OKC to experience the Kingdom of God in the everyday lives. Far too often we seperate our spiritual lives from our actual life. We believe following Jesus is a 24/7 endeavor and…
Religious organization devoted to strengthening members' personal faith.
The purpose of this corporation is international biblical education and the activities that make that goal possible. we seek to come alongside church bodies who desire to study god's work and assist them to teach their leaders a solid,…
Evangelizing the lost through gospel crusades, camps and conferences; Empowering orphans and widows and those in need through Christ-centered vocational training; and Equipping ministers of the gospel through Christian seminars and…
Childrens Home and Ministry in India
Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…
Biblical counseling
Providing guality Christian education to the network generation
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Positive Tomorrows Inc and the most unlike its peers is For Generations Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 101 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ILLUMINATIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Oklahoma Capitol Culture Inc ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE MANSION INC ↗
- Who funds College Golf Fellowship ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds YOD ASSOCIATES INC ↗
- Who funds THE SARAH STITT HOPE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds STAND IN THE GAP INC ↗
- Who funds Scott & Kim Verplank Foundation ↗
- Who funds Favor International Inc ↗
- Who funds REGENT PREPARATORY SCHOOL OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds CROSSOVER PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds HIS HOUSE OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC DBA SHE BREWS COFFEE & TRANSITION PROG ↗
- Who funds ACCEPTABLE GIFT INC ↗
- Who funds FOR GENERATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds IN HIS IMAGE INC ↗
- Who funds Youth with a Mission New Beginnings Home ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · Oneok Foundation Inc · Hern Family Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Convoy of Hope
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Stitt Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Freedom House Inc — 4% of income from government
- First Americans Museum Foundation — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.