Skip to content
Statler Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Statler Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$34kFood & Nutrition$30kCrime & Legal$14kHousing & Shelter$9kCivil Rights$7kEducation$6kHealth$5kEmployment$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$667k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Humane Society$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%The Place: $3k → 9%The Place: $3k → 9%The Place: $3k → 9%Springs Rescue Mission: $500 → 9%One Nation Walking Together: $2k → 9%One Nation Walking Together: $1k → 9%One Nation Walking Together: $1k → 9%One Nation Walking Together: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$107k · 14 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
15

Total granted

$107k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+10%

Still filing today

57%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentHuman ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GG
    GROWING GARDENS OF BOULDER COUNTY
    7× · 2017–2023 · $23k · revenue +155%
  • Care and Share Inc
    2× · 2020–2022 · $8k · revenue +15%
  • TP
    The Place
    3× · 2020–2022 · $8k · revenue +323%

Funded once

  • MA
    Mindfulness and Positivity Project
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -3%
  • C
    CASA
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Housing Network of Fort Collins Inc

Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…

Human Services
2
Colorado Mental Wellness Network

To empower Coloradans affected by mental health conditions and providing them with skills and tools necessary to achieve their personal wellness goal.

Health
3
Safehouse Progressive Alliance for Nonviolence Inc

To provide safe shelter, support and advocacy for adults and their children, and to provide an end to violence against adults, youth and children through support, advocacy and community organizing.

Human Services
4
Mountain Child Advocacy Center Inc

The mission of the Mountain Child Advocacy Center is to prevent harm, protect children and heal families through best practice programs and community collaboration.

—
5
Mental Health Center of Denver

We empower people to overcome barriers and achieve lasting well-being through collaborative behavioral health care and comprehensive support.

Health
6
Safehouse Denver Inc

Safehouse denver assists adult, children, and youth in reclaiming their right to a life free from domestic violence. the agency provides a broad spectrum of culturally competent, trauma-informed services, including but not limited to,…

Human Services
7
Center for Community Solutions

The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…

Health
8
Metropolitan Denver Homeless Initiative Inc

Mission: leading and advancing collaboration to end homelessness in our region. vision: dedicated to everyone in the metro region having a safe, stable place to call home. values: committed to core values that bring people home: -…

Housing & Shelter
9
Mount St Vincent Home Inc

As part of intermountain health, mount saint vincent partners with children and families to heal beyond trauma into a healthy and hopeful future.

—
10
The Savila Collaborative

The svila collaborative dba centro savila is a treatment program devoted to the recovery and healing of individuals, families, and communities experiencing emotional and psychological distress. our vision is to create a healthy, engaged,…

Health
11
Hilltop Health Services Corporation

Hilltop community resources is dedicated to building a community where everyone belongs. our tailored programs address the unique needs of individuals and families, from behavioral health support and intimate partner violence services to…

Health
12
A Shared Vision Partners in Pediatric Blindness and Visual Imp

A Shared Vision educates, inspires, and empowers families to nurture the development of their young children who are blind or visually impaired. We provide early intervention vision services in families' homes and community settings…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Springs Rescue Mission; the most unlike its peers is One Nation Walking Together. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Humane Society: $23,500 · OtherHumane SocietyCheyenne Mountain Zoo: $10,000 · OtherCheyenne Mountain ZooIndividual grant recipient: $9,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSafe Passage Childrens Advocacy Center: $6,000 · OtherSafe Passage Childrens Advocacy CenterFAMILY LEARNING CENTER: $5,500 · OtherFAMILY LEARNING CENTERGoodwill Industries: $3,000 · OtherCASA: $2,750 · Other+10 more: $6,250 · Other+10 moreGROWING GARDENS OF BOULDER COUNTY: $22,500 · EnvironmentGROWING GARDENS OF BOU…+2 more: $1,000 · EnvironmentThe Place: $7,500 · Human ServicesThe PlaceONE NATION WALKING TOGETHER: $4,500 · Human ServicesONE NATION …THE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $500 · Human ServicesCare and Share Inc: $7,500 · Food & NutritionCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER FOR THE PIKES PEAK REGION INC: $5,000 · Crime & LegalMindfulness and Positivity Project: $3,000 · HealthNAMI National: $750 · HealthThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $500 · HealthCASA of the Pikes Peak Region: $2,000 · Civil Rights
Other$66,000Environment$23,500Human Services$12,500Food & Nutrition$7,500Crime & Legal$5,000Health$4,250Civil Rights$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGROWING GARDENS OF BOULDER COUNTY: $22,500 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetCare and Share Inc: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Place: $7,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY LEARNING CENTER: $5,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER FOR THE PIKES PEAK REGION INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetONE NATION WALKING TOGETHER: $4,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetMindfulness and Positivity Project: $3,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCASA of the Pikes Peak Region: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN MUTUAL HOUSING ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI National: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budget350 COLORADO: $750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOSAIC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFrontier Horizon Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GROWING GARDENS OF BOULDER COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Care and Share Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Place ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER FOR THE PIKES PEAK REGION INC ↗
  • Who funds ONE NATION WALKING TOGETHER ↗
  • Who funds Mindfulness and Positivity Project ↗
  • Who funds CASA of the Pikes Peak Region ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN MUTUAL HOUSING ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NAMI National ↗
  • Who funds 350 COLORADO ↗
  • Who funds THE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MOSAIC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds Frontier Horizon Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives Founda…Hill Foundation Wells…The Joseph Henry Edmo…Anschutz Family Found…El Pomar FoundationColorado Springs Oste…INDYGIVE DBA Give Pik…Colorado Springs Heal…The Colorado Health F…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
Colorado Gives FoundationCO22.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Hill Foundation Wells Fargo Bank Na · The Joseph Henry Edmondson Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Colorado Springs Osteopathic Foundation · INDYGIVE DBA Give Pikes Peak · Colorado Springs Health Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Statler Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Statler Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Statler Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home