Skip to content
Stanley and Kathleen Grumbacher Fdn Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Stanley and Kathleen Grumbacher Fdn Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$303k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$1.2MHealth$290kPhilanthropy$169kEducation$100kReligion$26kEmployment$5kHousing & Shelter$3kCivil Rights$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $300k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART$200,000
UJA FEDERATION OF NY$50,000
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$50,000
UPPER VALLEY JEWISH COMMUNITY INC$3,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%NORTHWELL HEALTH: $25k → 6%PROMISE PROJECT: $10k → 17%AMERICAN BALLET THEATER: $141k → 14%UPPER VALLEY JEWISH COMMUNTY CENTER: $5k → 10%NYU LANGONE MEDICAL CENTER: $50k → 17%AMERICAN BALLET THEATER: $125k → 14%UPPER VALLEY JEWISH COMMUNTY CENTER: $4k → 10%NYU LANGONE MEDICAL CENTER: $50k → 17%AMERICAN BALLET THEATER: $125k → 14%UPPER VALLEY JEWISH COMMUNITY INC: $4k → 10%NYU LANGONE MEDICAL CENTER: $25k → 17%AMERICAN BALLET THEATER: $82k → 14%UJA FEDERATION OF NY: $50k → 17%AMERICAN BALLET THEATER: $45k → 14%UJA-FEDERATION OF NY: $50k → 17%UJA-FEDERATION OF NY: $26k → 17%UJA-FEDERATION OF NY: $25k → 17%UJA FEDERATION OF NY: $5k → 17%LENOX HILL HOSPITAL: $29k → 17%FRICK COLLECTION: $25k → 17%MISC ORGANIZED CHARITIES: $6k → 17%MISC ORGANIZED CHARITIES: $3k → 17%NYC BALLET: $13k → 17%METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $200k → 17%LINCOLN CENTER THEATRE: $5k → 17%METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $200k → 17%LINCOLN CENTER THEATRE: $5k → 17%METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $50k → 17%LINCOLN CENTER THEATER: $5k → 17%METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $25k → 17%NEW YORK PHILHARMONIC: $5k → 17%METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $25k → 17%LINCOLN CENTER THEATRE: $5k → 17%NATIONAL ACADEMY OF DESIGN: $25k → 17%METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $25k → 17%MANHATTAN THEARRE CLUB: $71k → 17%MANHATTAN THEARE CLUB: $50k → 17%MANHATTAN THEARE CLUB: $25k → 17%MANHATTAN THEATER CLUB: $25k → 17%MANHATTAN THEARE CLUB: $25k → 17%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $50k → 17%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $50k → 17%PARK AVE SYNAGOGUE: $25k → 17%PARK AVE SYNAGOGUE: $21k → 17%PARK AVE SYNAGOGUE: $11k → 17%PARK AVE SYNAGOGUE: $10k → 17%PARK AVE SYNAGOGUE: $7k → 17%STRIVE: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 11 repeat orgs$243k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
15

Total granted

$1.7M
$243k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+23%

Still filing today

27%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthEducationPhilanthropyCivil RightsEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
    6× · 2019–2025 · $525k · revenue +76%
  • AB
    AMERICAN BALLET THEATER
    5× · 2017–2021 · $518k
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    5× · 2019–2025 · $156k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • MT
    MANHATTAN THEARRE CLUB
    one grant, 2018 · $71k
  • LH
    Lenox Hill Hospitalgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $29k · revenue +40%
  • TF
    The Frick Collection
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Long Island Jewish Medical Center

Long island jewish medical center is part of the northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and…

Health
2
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
3
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
4
North Shore University Hospital

North shore university hospital is part of northwell health ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care; educating the current and future…

Health
5
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
6
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
7
Northwell Health Foundation

Northwell health foundation inc. is dedicated toward helping donors, patients, and leaders link their vision and philanthropic support toward helping the underserved and uninsured, advancing the latest frontiers in medical technology and…

Health
8
Northwell Healthcare Inc

Northwell healthcare inc. coordinates policy making and strategic planning by providing advisory and administrative support services to affiliated health care organizations within northwell health; whose mission is to improve the health of…

Health
9
Northern Westchester Hospital Association

Northern westchester hospital association is an affiliate within northwell health, inc. ("northwell"), which strives to improve the health of the communities it serves and is committed to providing the highest quality clinical care;…

Health
10
Berggruen Institute
Education
11
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
12
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Frick Collection; the most unlike its peers is Strive International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN BALLET THEATER: $517,800 · OtherAMERICAN BALLET THEATERNYU LANGONE MEDICAL CENTER: $125,000 · OtherNYU LANGONE MEDICAL CENTERMANHATTAN THEARE CLUB: $100,000 · OtherMANHATTAN THEARE CLUBIndividual grant recipient: $72,625 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMANHATTAN THEARRE CLUB: $71,000 · OtherMANHATTAN THEARRE CLUB+9 more: $129,130 · Other+9 moreMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $525,000 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART+3 more: $10,500 · Arts & CultureUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $156,400 · PhilanthropyUNITED JE…New York University: $100,000 · EducationNATIONAL ACADEMY OF DESIGN: $25,000 · EducationLenox Hill Hospital: $29,150 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthNORTHWELL HEALTH INC: $25,000 · Community ImprovementSTRIVE INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,000 · EmploymentAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $1,500 · Civil Rights
Other$1,015,555Arts & Culture$535,500Philanthropy$156,400Education$125,000Health$30,150Community Improvement$25,000Employment$5,000Civil Rights$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $525,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $156,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLenox Hill Hospital: $29,150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Frick Collection: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ACADEMY OF DESIGN: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSTRIVE INTERNATIONAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VIVIAN BEAUMONT THEATERINC D/B/A LINCOLN CENTER THEATER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCURE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWORKS AND PROCESS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds Lenox Hill Hospital ↗
  • Who funds The Frick Collection ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ACADEMY OF DESIGN ↗
  • Who funds STRIVE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE VIVIAN BEAUMONT THEATERINC D/B/A LINCOLN CENTER THEATER ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds CURE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WORKS AND PROCESS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gs Donor Advised Phil…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management IncNY11.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stanley and Kathleen Grumbacher Fdn Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stanley and Kathleen Grumbacher Fdn Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stanley and Kathleen Grumbacher Fdn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home