Skip to content
Stanford Health Care at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Stanford Health Care

$110M
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$104M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

96% of Stanford Health Care’s FY2024 grant dollars went to The Board Of Trustees Of The Leland Stanford Junior University, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 23 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

12
’17
17
’18
16
’19
16
’20
12
’21
28
’22
20
’23
23
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$462MEducation$146MHousing & Shelter$4.8MHuman Services$3.4MFood & Nutrition$2.5MEmployment$672kPhilanthropy$100kPublic Safety & Disaster$100kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $130k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+9 grants · $107M
$175,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$12.1B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES STANFORD UNIVERSITY$104,416,806
PENINSULA HEALTHCARE CONNECTION INC$550,644
DESTINATION HOME$500,000
LIFEMOVES$400,000
SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY$378,000
THE HEALTH TRUST$350,000
SAMARITAN HOUSE$293,037
PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE$252,380
SOUTH COUNTY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC$250,000
WE HOPE$231,750
DOWNTOWN STREETS INC$214,000
AVENIDAS$195,000
FUTURO HEALTH$175,000
MOMENTUM FOR HEALTH$150,000
AMBULATORY SURGERY ACCESS COALITION$126,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%WATER AND EDUCATION INTERNATIONAL INC: $18k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100k → 14%AVENIDAS: $325k → 8%AVENIDAS: $323k → 8%AVENIDAS: $310k → 8%SENIOR COASTSIDERS INC: $60k → 7%AVENIDAS: $195k → 8%STARVISTA: $13k → 7%AVENIDAS: $195k → 8%SENIOR COASTSIDERS INC: $35k → 7%STARVISTA: $12k → 7%AVENIDAS: $175k → 8%SENIOR COASTSIDERS INC: $30k → 7%AVENIDAS: $100k → 8%AFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $10k → 8%NEXT DOOR SOLUTIONS TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $8k → 8%AFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY: $8k → 8%YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSN SIL VALLEY: $10k → 8%COMMUNITY SVCS AGENCY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$19M · 31 repeat orgs$862k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
14

Total granted

$19M
$339k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+23%

Still filing today

90%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $523k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterEmploymentFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +45%
  • SC
    South County Community Health Center Inc dba Ravenswood Family Health Center
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +115%
  • PH
    PENINSULA HEALTHCARE CONNECTION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +362%

Funded once

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +23%
  • PD
    PUENTE DE LA COSTA SURgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $80k · revenue +56%
  • SV
    Silicon Valley Bicycle Coalition
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture Inc

Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.

—
2
Equity Health

Our mission is to ensure health care access to quality comprehensive health care services for persons who are medically needy or medically under-served and have traditionally experienced difficulty in getting care from traditional sources.

—
3
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
4
Tiburcio Vasquez Health Center Inc

Provide comprehensive community health services to southern Alameda County.

Health
5
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
6
Bay Area Community Services Housing Corp

Improve the quality of life for individuals in Alameda County, Contra Costa County, Solano County, Monterey County, Sacramento County and the surrounding area in the State of California.

Housing & Shelter
7
Santa Rosa Community Health Centers

The Santa Rosa Community Health Centers are dedicated to providing excellent, comprehensive primary health care, prevention, and health education for people who are uninsured and underinsured in Santa Rosa, regardless of ability to pay.

Health
8
Valley Health Team Inc

Valley Health Team, Inc. was established in 1973 for the purpose of providing accessible comprehensive, quality primary health care and additional services to the people in the communities we serve in a culturally and linguistically…

Health
9
Asian and Pacific Islander Wellness Center Inc

Our core belief at San Francisco Community Health Center is that everyone deserves to be healthy and needs access to the highest quality health care. Our mission is to transform lives by advancing health, wellness and equality.

Health
10
Street Level Health Project

Health Care for All is the heart of the Oakland-based grassroots organization Street Level Health Project Street Level. Incorporated in 2001, Street Level is a critical entry point into the healthcare and social service system for those…

Health
11
Marin Community Clinic

To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.

Health
12
San Francisco Community Clinic Consortium

To develop and implement programs and to support policies that increase access to community based primary care for the uninsured and underserved patients in the city and county of san francisco.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Health Trust; the most unlike its peers is Khalil Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
60/61
Grantees still filing
47/61
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $595,897,139 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY+1 more: $39,500 · EducationSouth County Community Health Center Inc dba Ravenswood Family Health Center: $2,158,210 · HealthPENINSULA HEALTHCARE CONNECTION INC: $2,156,932 · HealthTHE HEALTH TRUST: $1,785,000 · HealthHEALTHCARE FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN AND CENTRAL CALIFORNIA: $1,230,553 · HealthAmbulatory Surgery Access Coalition: $578,500 · HealthPublic Health Institute: $528,406 · HealthSONRISAS DENTAL HEALTH INC: $439,354 · HealthROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $416,903 · Health+11 more: $981,107 · HealthSAMARITAN HOUSE: $1,789,620 · OtherLIFEMOVES: $800,000 · OtherMAYVIEW COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $737,500 · OtherCounty of Santa Clara: $383,146 · OtherWEHOPE: $231,750 · Other+11 more: $422,250 · OtherDestination Home SV co Silicon Valley Community Foundation: $3,050,000 · Housing & Shelter+3 more: $73,800 · Housing & ShelterSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $2,461,000 · Food & NutritionAVENIDAS: $1,622,565 · Human ServicesSENIOR COASTSIDERS INC: $125,200 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $100,000 · Human Services+6 more: $87,860 · Human ServicesDowntown Streets Inc: $1,041,296 · EmploymentJOBTRAIN INC: $69,095 · Employment
Education$595,936,639Health$10,274,965Other$4,364,266Housing & Shelter$3,123,800Food & Nutrition$2,461,000Human Services$1,935,625Employment$1,110,391

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $595,897,139 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetDestination Home SV co Silicon Valley Community Foundation: $3,050,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $2,461,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSouth County Community Health Center Inc dba Ravenswood Family Health Center: $2,158,210 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetPENINSULA HEALTHCARE CONNECTION INC: $2,156,932 over 8y, 14% of budgetSAMARITAN HOUSE: $1,789,620 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetTHE HEALTH TRUST: $1,785,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetAVENIDAS: $1,622,565 over 7y, 4.8% of budgetHEALTHCARE FOUNDATION OF NORTHERN AND CENTRAL CALIFORNIA: $1,230,553 over 5y, 79% of budgetDowntown Streets Inc: $1,041,296 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetLIFEMOVES: $800,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMAYVIEW COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC: $737,500 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetAmbulatory Surgery Access Coalition: $578,500 over 7y, 5.1% of budgetPublic Health Institute: $528,406 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSONRISAS DENTAL HEALTH INC: $439,354 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetROOTS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER: $416,903 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetMOMENTUM FOR HEALTH: $310,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWEHOPE: $231,750 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetFUTURO HEALTH: $175,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE ASIAN AMERICANS FOR COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC: $171,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSENIOR COASTSIDERS INC: $125,200 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetCAL VOICES: $104,652 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI SANTA CLARA COUNTY: $93,050 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetPUENTE DE LA COSTA SUR: $80,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetJOBTRAIN INC: $69,095 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetVALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION (VHF): $50,405 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $50,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRebuilding Together Peninsula: $48,800 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCommunity Health Partnership Inc: $47,500 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetThe Peninsula College Fund: $39,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetROTACARE BAY AREA INC: $36,250 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetLATINAS CONTRA CANCER: $30,000 over 3y, 6.8% of budgetSilicon Valley Bicycle Coalition: $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetStarVista: $24,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKARA: $24,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWATER AND EDUCATION INTERNATIONAL INC: $18,360 over 1y, 21% of budgetAFRICAN AMERICAN COMMUNITY SERVICE AGENCY: $17,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWEST VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGARDNER FAMILY HEALTH NETWORK INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVITUITY CARES FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetPALO ALTO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE LTD: $12,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW LOS ALTOS AND LOS ALTOS HILLS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYWCA GOLDEN GATE SILICON VALLEY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHuman Investment Project Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetASIAN HEALTH SERVICES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Sobrato Family Fo…Kaiser Foundation Hos…The David and Lucile …Silicon Valley Commun…Sunlight GivingSecond Harvest of Sil…Sutter Bay HospitalsDestination Home SV c…Gordon E and Betty I …San Jose Mercury News…Atkinson FoundationLos Altos Mountain Vi…
The Sobrato Family FoundationCA51.6× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Sobrato Family Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Sunlight Giving · Second Harvest of Silicon Valley · Sutter Bay Hospitals · Destination Home SV co Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · Atkinson Foundation · Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stanford Health Care funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stanford Health Care. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    31report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Stanford Health Care’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home