Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Stable Road Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$493k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$317k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

International$1.0MEnvironment$487kHealth$296kYouth Development$171kHuman Services$125kEducation$79kArts & Culture$74kReligion$43kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $115k
  • $250k+1 grant · $317k
$8,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$999k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Global Empowerment Mission Inc$317,218
REDFORD CENTER INC$65,000
IMUA FAMILY SERVICES$50,000
MAUI HEALTH FOUNDATION$10,000
WOMEN UNITED FOR ANIMAL WELFARE$10,000
Friends of Childrens Justice Center of Maui$10,000
USC Verdugo Hills Hospital Foundation$8,500
Evelyn Swierczynski Foundation$5,000
PACIFIC CANCER FOUNDATION$5,000
HUNT FOUNDATION INC$5,000
SUMMIT 54$5,000
Institute for Education Research and Scholarship$1,500
DOLPHINS CYCLING CHALLENGE INC$1,025
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $392k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 6% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GIVEPOWER FOUNDATION: $253k → 7%THE OTHER ONES FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%Hoping Hearts Foundation Inc: $5k → 6%Givepower Foundation: $100k → 10%Youth Technology Corps NFP Inc: $7k → 14%GIVEPOWER FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%THE GERSHMAN Y: $4k → 22%DEEDLY INC: $5k → 15%MAUI FAMILY YMCA: $5k → 9%THE GERSHMAN Y: $6k → 22%THE GERSHMAN Y: $3k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WA
IL
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
CT
CA
UT
CO
VA
DC
HI
LA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 11% of Stable Road Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Stable Road Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 16% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.1M · 36 repeat orgs$356k to everyone else

36 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
56

Total granted

$2.1M
$283k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+32%

Still filing today

81%
89%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $73k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GF
    GIVEPOWER FOUNDATION
    3× · 2019–2023 · $357k · revenue +122%
  • TB
    THE BUDDY PROGRAM INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $123k · revenue +52%
  • IF
    IMUA FAMILY SERVICES
    6× · 2020–2025 · $115k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • GO
    Gift of Life
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • CC
    CHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $13k
  • LR
    LIFE ROLLS ON FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $11k · revenue -9%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Hawaii Foundation

To unite donors' passions with the university of hawai'i's (uh) aspirations by raising philanthropic support and managing investments to benefit uh, the people of hawai'i and our future generations.

Education
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Hawaii International Film Festival

To foster international cultural awareness and understanding through the medium of film. to act as a creative pipeline for hawaii and the pacific, showcasing new and emerging talent from hawaii, asia, americas, europe, and the pacific…

Arts & Culture
4
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
5
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
6
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
7
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
8
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
9
For the Fishes

To address, educate, coordinate, and enhance enforcement capacity to end teh trade in coral reef wildlife for household and other small display aquariums. our supply and demand side strategies are directed locally and globally to…

Animals
10
The Poptech Institute

Poptech's mission is to accelerate the positive impact of world-changing people, projects and ideas. founded in 1996 by bob metcalfe (inventor, ethernet) and john sculley (apple, pepsi), poptech originally provided a forum to critically…

Education
11
Mohala Pua School Dba Honolulu Waldorf School

See schedule o.at honolulu waldorf school, we educate each child to find meaning, passion, and purpose in life and to contribute to the creation of a better world for all. through a curriculum based on the developmental stages of the human…

Education
12
Pacific American Foundation

The pacific american foundation is dedicated to improving the lives of pacific americans by educating and informing decision makers and leaders at all levels on the vital policy areas for americans who trace their ancestry to the…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Makai Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Aspen Homeless Shelter. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Animal Rescue and ShelterChristian Missionary Organi…Youth Sports ProgramsYouth Mentoring ProgramsEnvironmental Conservation …Lgbtq+ Community SupportFood Banks and PantriesMilitary Veterans SupportAffordable Housing Developm…Policy Research and AdvocacyPublic Library OperationsAddiction Recovery ServicesCancer Support ServicesOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Youth Development ServicesUnited Way AffiliatesYmca Youth DevelopmentCommunity Arts CentersJewish Community Organizati…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%25%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%25%35–55yr16%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%66%10–20yr16%6%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr16%4%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/94
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,471

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

90 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 90 of the 101 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
27
Early backer (in before they grew)
87/90
Grantees still filing
66/90
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INC — $995,000 · Public Safety & DisasterGLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INCGIVEPOWER FOUNDATION — $357,370 · Human ServicesGIVEPOWER FOUNDATI…+7 more — $47,721 · Human Services+7 moreCREATE CURES FOUNDATION — $126,000 · HealthCREATE CURES FOU…IMUA FAMILY SERVICES — $115,000 · HealthIMUA FAMILY SERV…MAUI HEALTH FOUNDATION — $40,000 · HealthMAUI HEALTH FOUN…USC VERDUGO HILLS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $28,500 · HealthUSC VERDUGO HILL…+9 more — $51,838 · Health+9 moreTHE BUDDY PROGRAM INC — $122,500 · OtherTHE BUDDY PROGRAM I…YOUTH TECHNOLOGY CORPS INC — $15,000 · OtherFriends of Childrens Justice Center of Maui — $15,000 · OtherGift of Life — $14,935 · OtherTHE HUNT FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · OtherWOMEN UNITED FOR ANIMAL WELFARE — $15,000 · OtherKITECHILD — $15,000 · Other+43 more — $203,993 · Other+43 moreREDFORD CENTER INC — $65,000 · EnvironmentHAWAIIAN ISLANDS LAND TRUST — $15,150 · EnvironmentUHIWAI O HALEAKALA — $10,000 · EnvironmentLove the Sea — $10,000 · EnvironmentTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION — $6,500 · EnvironmentGuilford Land Conservation Trust Inc — $5,000 · EnvironmentMALAMA KAHALAWAI INC — $5,000 · Environment+1 more — $1,500 · EnvironmentSUFFIELD ACADEMY — $19,000 · EducationSUMMIT54 — $15,500 · EducationMIGHTY WRITERS — $13,000 · EducationThe George Washington University — $5,000 · EducationMYSTIC & NOANK LIBRARY INC — $5,000 · EducationSPONSORS FOR EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITY INC — $5,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $5,000 · EducationROOM TO READ — $2,500 · Education+2 more — $2,500 · EducationARDEN THEATRE COMPANY — $13,000 · Arts & CultureMANHATTAN CLASS COMPANY INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureMUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC — $9,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER — $7,500 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $5,181 · Arts & CultureWEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY — $5,000 · Arts & CultureTRIBAL TRUST FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · Arts & CulturePHILADELPHIA ORCHESTRA ASSOCIATION — $3,000 · Arts & CultureSouthern Smoke Foundation — $2,500 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $1,906 · Arts & Culture
Public Safety & Disaster$995,000Human Services$405,091Health$361,338Other$416,428Environment$118,150Education$72,500Arts & Culture$62,087

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGLOBAL EMPOWERMENT MISSION INC — $995,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGIVEPOWER FOUNDATION — $357,370 over 3y, 5.8% of budgetCREATE CURES FOUNDATION — $126,000 over 5y, 9.4% of budgetTHE BUDDY PROGRAM INC — $122,500 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetIMUA FAMILY SERVICES — $115,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetMAUI HEALTH FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetUSC VERDUGO HILLS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $28,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSUFFIELD ACADEMY — $19,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSUMMIT54 — $15,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetHAWAIIAN ISLANDS LAND TRUST — $15,150 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HUNT FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 2y, 44% of budgetWOMEN UNITED FOR ANIMAL WELFARE — $15,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetKITECHILD — $15,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetMIGHTY WRITERS — $13,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetARDEN THEATRE COMPANY — $13,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHERASURF — $12,721 over 2y, 21% of budgetPHILADELPHIA JEWISH FILM AND MEDIA — $12,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetLIFE ROLLS ON FOUNDATION — $11,200 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $10,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN FLORIDA INC — $10,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHALE MAKUA HEALTH SERVICES — $10,113 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUHIWAI O HALEAKALA — $10,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetPACIFIC CANCER FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMANHATTAN CLASS COMPANY INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIAN WALSH MENEHUNE MAYHEM FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC — $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNeshama Center — $8,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetNATIONAL CONSTITUTION CENTER — $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH TECHNOLOGY CORPS NFP INC — $7,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF THE PHILADELPHIA REGION — $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SURFRIDER FOUNDATION — $6,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASPEN YOUTH CENTER — $6,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetYOU CAN PLAY — $5,181 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHAWAII HOTEL INDUSTRY FOUNDATION — $5,181 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC — $5,181 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc — $5,154 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC — $5,133 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC — $5,113 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDEEDLY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetWEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY — $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNAVY SEALS FUND — $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetThe George Washington University — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPING HEARTS FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMYSTIC & NOANK LIBRARY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGuilford Land Conservation Trust Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetSHARING CONNEXION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTRIBAL TRUST FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Roy H and Lorraine M Okumura FoundationHI17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Roy H and Lorraine M Okumura Foundation · Fred Baldwin Memorial Foundation · Bank of Hawaii Charitable Fdn · Aspen Community Foundation · Bendon Family Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · The Martin Family Foundation · The O L Moore Foundation · The Red Cabin Foundation Trust · The Strong Foundation · Atherton Family Foundation · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Stable Road Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 70%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Best Buddies International Inc4% of income from government
  • Mystic & Noank Library Inc0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc0% of income from government
  • Global Empowerment Mission Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Stable Road Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Stable Road Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 101 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph