Skip to content
St Luke's Hospital at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

St Luke's Hospital

St.

$101k
Granted FY2023
2
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$79k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Health$26MAnimals$180kEducation$60kRecreation & Sports$55kArts & Culture$18kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kYouth Development$8k
02FY2023 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $89,495, the rows itemized in this filing. The $101,345 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $11,850 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $79k
$79,495
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST LUKE'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$79,495
NATURES NURSERY CENTER FOR WILDLIFE REHABILITIATION AND CONSERVATION EDUCAT$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$26M · 7 repeat orgs$101k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2023, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
8

Total granted

$26M
$101k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-19%
-10%

Still filing today

86%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23
HealthAnimalsEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WP
    WELLCARE PHYSICIANS GROUP LLC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $24M
  • SL
    ST LUKE'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2023 · $1.6M · revenue -83%
  • TT
    THE TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
    5× · 2017–2022 · $160k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • MARCH OF DIMES INC
    one grant, 2019 · $23k · revenue -35%
  • LT
    LPGA TOURNAMENT PROPERTIES
    one grant, 2019 · $22k
  • HC
    HOSPITAL COUNCIL OF NORTHWEST OHIO
    one grant, 2019 · $11k · revenue -10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The University of Toledo Foundation

The mission of the university of toledo foundation is to secure the future for the university of toledo, through prudent asset management and philanthropy. we build strong linkages between alumni and the university, fostering a spirit of…

Education
2
Mount Carmel College of Nursing

We, mount carmel and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.mount carmel college of nursing is a member of mount carmel and trinity health.

—
3
University of Toledo Alumni Association

Supporting the university of toledo by fostering a spirit of loyalty among its alumni.

Education
4
University of Toledo Physicians Clinical Faculty Inc

To improve the human condition through excellence in patient care and medical discovery.

—
5
Loyola University Medical Center

We, loyola university health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.lumc is a member of loyola university health system and trinity…

Health
6
The Toledo Hospital

As an integral part of promedica health system, inc., we are a valuable community resource providing comprehensive health services with expertise and compassion, and improving the health of those we serve through prevention, education, and…

Health
7
Mclaren Port Huron

Mclaren healthcare, through its subsidiaries, will be the best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

Health
8
Atrium Medical Center Foundation

To develop charitable gifts and resources dedicated to building healthier communities in southwest ohio.

Health
9
Union Hospital Inc

We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.

Health
10
Miami Valley Hospital Foundation

Enhance the patient and family experience at miami valley hospital by raising community support for cutting-edge programs and services which help build healthy communities.

Health
11
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
12
Marietta Memorial Hospital of Tyler County Inc

Sistersville general hospital is a not-for-profit critical access hospital where service excellence and clinical quality create the region's best experience for patients and their families, physicians, the community, and our employees.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Luke's Hospital Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Urban Sight Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
4/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WELLCARE PHYSICIANS GROUP LLC: $24,276,326 · OtherWELLCARE PHYSICIANS GROUP LLCST LUKE'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1,584,228 · OtherST LUKE'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION+4 more: $69,500 · OtherTHE TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $160,000 · AnimalsNATURES NURSERY CENTER FOR WILDLIFE REHAB & CONSR: $20,000 · AnimalsAmerican Heart Association Inc: $28,250 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $22,500 · HealthHOSPITAL COUNCIL OF NORTHWEST OHIO: $11,000 · HealthPANTHER PRIDE FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationLOURDES UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationURBAN SIGHT INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 · Human Services
Other$25,930,054Animals$180,000Health$61,750Education$60,000Arts & Culture$10,000Human Services$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST LUKE'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $1,584,228 over 6y, 19% of budgetTHE TOLEDO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $160,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPANTHER PRIDE FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetTOLEDO CLASSIC INC: $32,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $28,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $22,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATURES NURSERY CENTER FOR WILDLIFE REHAB & CONSR: $20,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetHOSPITAL COUNCIL OF NORTHWEST OHIO: $11,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOURDES UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN SIGHT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEADERSHIP TOLEDO: $7,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Toledo Community Foun…The Mark S Feldstein …The O-I Charities Fou…The Andersons Fund Su…Firstenergy FoundationNisource Charitable F…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Toledo Community Foundation IncOH23.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Toledo Community Foundation Inc · The Mark S Feldstein and Sandra a Feldstein · The O-I Charities Foundation · The Andersons Fund Supporting Organization · Firstenergy Foundation · Nisource Charitable Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization St Luke's Hospital funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from St Luke's Hospital. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on St Luke's Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home