· Public charity
United Way of Treasure Valley Inc
United way of treasure valley mobilizes the caring power of our community to advance the education, health, and financial stability of every person.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 31 grants below total $715,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,444,640 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,729,640 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $22k
- $10k–50k25 grants · $514k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $180k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JESSE TREE - EXTENDED EMERGENCY RENTAL & MERCY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM | $80,000 |
| CHARITABLE ASSISTANCE TO COMMUNITY'S HOMELESS (CATCH) - CATCH OF ADA & CANY | $50,000 |
| WOMEN'S & CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE -SAFE AND SECURE SHELTER | $50,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ADA COUNTY - YOUTH DEVELOPMENT | $40,000 |
| GIRAFFE LAUGH - SCHOLARSHIPS & MISSION SUPPORT FOR YOUNG CHILDREN | $40,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NAMPA INC - YOUTH DEVELOPMENT | $38,000 |
| IDAHO YOUTH RANCH - HAYS SHELTER HOME | $35,000 |
| TREASURE VALLEY FAMILY YMCA - EARLY AND SCHOOL AGE CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT | $30,000 |
| CASA OF SOUTHWEST IDAHO - THIRD DISTRICT GUARDIAN AD LITEM | $30,000 |
| LEAP CHARITIES - LEAP HOUSING TRUST | $26,500 |
| TERRY REILLY HEALTH SERVICES - DIABETIC CARE & NUTRITIONAL EDUCATION | $24,000 |
| NAMPA SCHOOL DISTRICT - COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTERS | $23,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTHWEST - YOUTH MENTORING | $21,000 |
| MARSING SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMUNITY SCHOOL | $20,000 |
| CALDWELL SCHOOL DISRICT - CALDWELL COMMUNITY SCHOOLS | $17,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against +43% for the ones you funded once.
37 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WAWomen's and Children's Alliance9× · 2017–2025 · $755k · revenue +26%
- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ADA CO ID9× · 2017–2025 · $530k · revenue +61%
- CICATCH INC9× · 2017–2025 · $510k · revenue +305%
Funded once
- ROREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF IDAHOone grant, 2019 · $84k
- NANATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS TREASURE VALLEY INCone grant, 2023 · $17k
- LRLIFEWAYS - REGION 3 WESTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY CRISIS CENTERone grant, 2020 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Idaho legal aid services inc is a statewide nonprofit law firm dedicated to providing equal access for low-income people through quality advocacy and education
Ipca supports community health centers in providing high-quality and affordable primary care to all idahoans through training and technical support. ipca keeps health centers current on issues and trends affecting the changing healthcare…
The organization protects, promotes and advances the legal and human rights of individuals with disabilities, through quality legal, individual, and system advocacy.
Family Health Services, a community health center, makes high-quality culturally sensitive, primary medical and dental care, behavioral health, and social services affordable and accessible for the people of South Central Idaho.
IHDE exists to create and maintain a collaborative statewide effort to improve the coordination and quality of healthcare through the use of a health information exchange and health information technology.
The idaho health care association, inc. is a member driven association whose mission is to provide the unified voice for the betterment of the idaho nursing home and assisted living care professionals and the residents they serve.
To help technology companies in Idaho start, grow, and thrive.
To support head start programs through advocacy, partnerships, collaboration, recognition, and professional development to achieve high quality outcomes for idaho's children, families and communities.
To address the concern of an inadequate supply of affordable, decent rental housing within the state of Idaho and other states and other similar areas of need. The Housing Company was created to encourage the development, management and…
Our promise is to deliver an experience of financial success, with unique style, at every stage of your life.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Home Society of Idaho Inc and the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Women's and Children's Alliance ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ADA CO ID ↗
- Who funds CATCH INC ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOISE CITY IDAHO ↗
- Who funds LEARNING LAB INC ↗
- Who funds GIRAFFE LAUGH INC ↗
- Who funds JANNUS INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CANYON COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds THE JESSE TREE OF IDAHO INC ↗
- Who funds IDAHO YOUTH RANCH INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINICS INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SW ID INC ↗
- Who funds GENESIS COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds FAMILY ADVOCACY CENTER & EDUCATION SERVI DBA FACES OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds Idaho Housing Foundation ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF IDAHO INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY ADVOCATE PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds Childrens Free Dental Clinic Inc ↗
- Who funds The Momentum Group Create Common Good ↗
- Who funds IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE ↗
- Who funds LIFES KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds EASTERSEALS - GOODWILL NORTHERN ROCKY MOUNTAIN INC ↗
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds IDAHO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST IDAHO RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds Idaho Association for the Education of Young Children ↗
- Who funds WESTERN IDAHO COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds LEAP CHARITIES INC ↗
- Who funds TREASURE VALLEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Idaho Community Foundation Inc · St Luke's Health System Ltd · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · Idaho Power Foundation Inc · Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health Inc · The Julius C Jeker Foundation Inc · Claude R & Ethel B Whittenberger Foundation · Simplot Company Foundation Inc · Lamb Weston Charitable Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · El& Bg Lightfoot Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of Treasure Valley Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.