Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Public charity

St Louis Office for Developmental Disability Resources

To ensure individuals with developmental disabilities in the city of st.

$7.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0171% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.

Human Services$23MEmployment$5.3MHousing & Shelter$4.3MHealth$2.3MCivil Rights$753kArts & Culture$617kCommunity Improvement$167kInternational$41kEducation$35kOther$15M
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 40 grants below total $6,725,303 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $7,340,426 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $615,123 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $344k
  • $50k–250k16 grants · $2.0M
  • $250k+8 grants · $4.4M
$93,308
Median grant
1
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST LOUIS ARC$1,618,293
ASSOCIATION ON AGING WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES$765,844
HORIZON HOUSING DEVELOPMENT COMPANY$663,368
MERSMO GOODWILL$292,411
INDUSTRIAL AID$290,619
EASTER SEALS MIDWEST$263,804
HORIZON NORTH INC$255,930
BRIDGES COMMUNITY SUPPORT SERVICES$255,674
PROJECT CU INC$217,964
UCP HEARTLAND$200,451
SUNNYHILL INC$186,066
TABERNACLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP$150,000
HOUSE OF PAIS$141,611
LIFEBRIDGE PARTNERSHIP$131,685
OPTIONS FOR JUSTICE$128,330
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $23.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 49% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%SUNNYHILL INC: $152k → 11%ASSOCIATION ON AGING WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES: $766k → 21%SUNNYHILL INC: $186k → 9%SUNNYHILL INC: $139k → 11%Association on Aging With Developmental Disabilities: $730k → 21%SUNNYHILL INC: $157k → 9%SUNNYHILL INC: $139k → 11%ASSOCIATION ON AGING WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES: $729k → 21%SUNNYHILL INC: $144k → 9%SUNNYHILL INC: $133k → 11%ASSOCIATION ON AGING WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES: $625k → 21%SUNNYHILL INC: $130k → 11%ASSOCIATION ON AGING WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES: $548k → 21%SUNNYHILL INC: $122k → 11%ASSOCIATION ON AGING WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES: $538k → 21%ASSOCIATION ON AGING WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES: $532k → 21%ASSOCIATION ON AGING WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES: $521k → 21%ASSOCIATION ON AGING WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES: $442k → 21%HORIZON NORTH INC: $256k → 21%HORIZON NORTH INC: $244k → 21%HORIZON NORTH INC: $234k → 21%HORIZON NORTH INC: $232k → 21%HORIZON NORTH INC: $232k → 21%HORIZON NORTH INC: $232k → 21%HORIZON NORTH INC: $230k → 21%HORIZON NORTH INC: $227k → 21%HORIZON NORTH INC: $226k → 21%FOCUS ON RESIDENTAL SERVICES INC DBA LAFAYETTE HABILITATION CENTER: $168k → 21%MERSMO GOODWILL: $488k → 21%MERSMO GOODWILL: $428k → 21%MERSMO GOODWILL: $383k → 21%MERSMO GOODWILL: $379k → 21%MERSMO GOODWILL: $375k → 21%MERSMO GOODWILL: $360k → 21%MERSMO GOODWILL: $306k → 21%MERSMO GOODWILL: $302k → 21%MERSMO GOODWILL: $292k → 21%RISE INC: $80k → 11%RAINBOW VILLAGE INC DBA PROMISE COMMUNITY HOMES: $75k → 11%ST LOUIS ARC: $1.8M → 11%ST LOUIS ARC: $1.7M → 11%ST LOUIS ARC: $1.6M → 11%ST LOUIS ARC: $1.4M → 11%ST LOUIS ARC: $1.1M → 11%ST LOUIS ARC: $778k → 11%ST LOUIS ARC: $717k → 11%ST LOUIS ARC: $658k → 11%ST LOUIS ARC: $263k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 55% of St Louis Office for Developmental Disability Resources’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

St Louis Office for Developmental Disability Resourceslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$51M · 45 repeat orgs$815k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

45 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

45
6

Total granted

$51M
$527k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+7%

Still filing today

80%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $288k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEmploymentArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    ST LOUIS ARC INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $10M · revenue +94%
  • AO
    ASSOCIATION ON AGING WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $5.4M · revenue +35% · 48% of their budget
  • MG
    MERSMISSOURI GOODWILL INDUSTRIES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.3M · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • SL
    ST LOUIS PROJECT CLUB
    one grant, 2017 · $386k
  • RV
    RAINBOW VILLAGE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $75k · revenue +7%
  • TO
    THE OASIS INSTITUTEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $26k · revenue +126%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Autism Services Inc

To provide cost-effective residential, social, intellectual, physical and vocational services to individuals with autism in group homes and in home support.

—
2
The Arc of the Capital Area

We empower central texans with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their families through compassionate case management and innovative programs.

—
3
Job Options Inc

To actively seek employment for individuals with psychological or physical disabilities.

Employment
4
Southwestern Independent Living Center Inc

Provides services for individuals with disabilities.

Human Services
5
Achieving Independence and Mobility Cil

Independent living services for persons with disabilities.

Human Services
6
Abilities At Work

To provide employment and alternative service programs for developmentally disabled adults in the portland metro area.

Employment
7
Center for Disabilities

Independent living service to disabled clients including information and referral, advocacy, peer counseling, il skills training, housing, employment, ramp installation, emergency rent, utilities and food.

Human Services
8
Spectrum Community Services

To develop and provide human service programs for intellectually and developmentally disabled children and adults in the areas of residential, enhanced health and support coordination; and to provide residential services for the mentally…

Human Services
9
Pathways of Wisconsin Inc

Pathways of wisconsin provides supported employment opportunities and empowerment through quality, person-centered programming for individuals of all abilities.

Human Services
10
Options Family of Services

Improve disabled persons quality of life.

—
11
Independent Living Inc

To establish places of residence for adults who are developmentally disabled so as to enable them to have available an environment which is condusive to their becoming and remaining productive members in society.

—
12
Employu Inc

employU is a nonprofit disability employment service creating an inclusive workforce for people with disabilities through education, empowerment, and advocacy.

Employment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Louis Arc Inc and the most unlike its peers is House of Pais. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr13%2%5–10yr17%9%10–20yr16%11%20–35yr17%41%35–55yr19%36%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr17%3%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr17%19%35–55yr19%50%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/56
the rest of the field
14%
1,453/10,101

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/45
Grantees still filing
33/45
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST LOUIS ARC INC — $10,061,189 · Human ServicesST LOUIS ARC INCASSOCIATION ON AGING WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES — $5,431,075 · Human ServicesASSOCIATION ON AGING WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITI…MERSMISSOURI GOODWILL INDUSTRIES — $3,315,030 · Human ServicesMERSMISSOURI GOODWILL INDUSTRIESHORIZON NORTH HOUSING INC — $2,113,700 · Human ServicesHORIZON NORTH HOUSING INCSUNNYHILL INC — $1,321,361 · Human ServicesSUNNYHILL INC+9 more — $834,327 · Human ServicesEASTER SEALS MIDWEST — $2,498,556 · OtherEASTER SEALS MIDWESTBridges Support — $2,456,809 · OtherBridges SupportTHE CENTER FOR HEAD INJURY SERVICES — $1,564,959 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR HEAD INJURY SERVIC…LIFEBRIDGE PARTNERSHIP — $1,180,759 · OtherLIFEBRIDGE PARTNERSHIPSOUTHSIDE WELLNESS — $1,173,388 · OtherSOUTHSIDE WELLNESSHOUSE OF PAIS — $1,138,883 · OtherHOUSE OF PAISPARAQUAD INC — $902,764 · OtherPARAQUAD INCJAZZ TRANSPORTATION — $562,836 · OtherOPTIONS FOR JUSTICE FOR PERSONS WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES — $513,937 · Other+18 more — $3,145,011 · Other+18 moreINDUSTRIAL AID INC — $1,756,911 · EmploymentINDUSTRIAL …PROJECT CU INC — $1,416,097 · EmploymentPROJECT CU …WORTH INDUSTRIES INC — $980,126 · EmploymentWORTH INDUS…CANTERBURY ENTERPRISES INC — $825,590 · EmploymentCANTERBURY …HEARTLAND INDUSTRIES INC — $364,552 · EmploymentHEARTLAND I…HORIZON HOUSING DEVELOPMENT COMPANY — $4,299,093 · Housing & ShelterHORIZON H…UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY HEARTLAND — $1,043,043 · HealthPREFERRED FAMILY HEALTHCARE INC — $1,013,391 · HealthJUDEVINE INC — $148,696 · Health+3 more — $68,536 · HealthRECREATION COUNCIL OF GREATER ST LOUIS — $753,240 · Civil RightsARTIST FIRST — $585,677 · Arts & CultureMUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS — $31,500 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$23,076,682Other$15,137,902Employment$5,343,276Housing & Shelter$4,299,093Health$2,273,666Civil Rights$753,240Arts & Culture$617,177

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST LOUIS ARC INC — $10,061,189 over 9y, 4.6% of budgetASSOCIATION ON AGING WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES — $5,431,075 over 9y, 48% of budgetHORIZON HOUSING DEVELOPMENT COMPANY — $4,299,093 over 9y, 38% of budgetMERSMISSOURI GOODWILL INDUSTRIES — $3,315,030 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetEASTER SEALS MIDWEST — $2,498,556 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetHORIZON NORTH HOUSING INC — $2,113,700 over 9y, 66% of budgetINDUSTRIAL AID INC — $1,756,911 over 9y, 7.9% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR HEAD INJURY SERVICES — $1,564,959 over 8y, 9.8% of budgetPROJECT CU INC — $1,416,097 over 9y, 11% of budgetSUNNYHILL INC — $1,321,361 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetLIFEBRIDGE PARTNERSHIP — $1,180,759 over 9y, 19% of budgetHOUSE OF PAIS — $1,138,883 over 9y, 49% of budgetUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY HEARTLAND — $1,043,043 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetPREFERRED FAMILY HEALTHCARE INC — $1,013,391 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWORTH INDUSTRIES INC — $980,126 over 9y, 14% of budgetPARAQUAD INC — $902,764 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetCANTERBURY ENTERPRISES INC — $825,590 over 9y, 7.7% of budgetRECREATION COUNCIL OF GREATER ST LOUIS — $753,240 over 9y, 11% of budgetARTIST FIRST — $585,677 over 9y, 43% of budgetOPTIONS FOR JUSTICE FOR PERSONS WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES — $513,937 over 5y, 32% of budgetFAMILY ADVOCACY AND COMMUNITY TRAINING INC — $453,645 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetEPWORTH CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC — $392,414 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetHEARTLAND INDUSTRIES INC — $364,552 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetVARIETY THE CHILDRENS CHARITY OF ST LOUIS — $277,768 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetGATEWAY REGION YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $204,329 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFOCUS ON RESIDENTIAL SERVICES — $200,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetPATHWAYS TO INDEPENDENCE — $164,282 over 9y, 4.2% of budgetJUDEVINE INC — $148,696 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetDOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF GREATER ST LOUIS — $90,478 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS — $81,780 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetRAINBOW VILLAGE INC — $74,503 over 1y, 19% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF MISSOURI — $57,692 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBest Buddies International Inc — $41,382 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDelta Gamma Center for Children with Vis — $36,184 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetNavigate STL Schools — $35,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetMUNICIPAL THEATRE ASSOCIATION OF ST LOUIS — $31,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE OASIS INSTITUTE — $26,148 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCITY SENIORS INC — $17,168 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetMERCY HOSPITALS EAST COMMUNITIES — $15,352 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHSIDE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER — $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOATS INC — $12,052 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ST LOUIS ARC INC ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION ON AGING WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES ↗
  • Who funds HORIZON HOUSING DEVELOPMENT COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds MERSMISSOURI GOODWILL INDUSTRIES ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS MIDWEST ↗
  • Who funds HORIZON NORTH HOUSING INC ↗
  • Who funds INDUSTRIAL AID INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR HEAD INJURY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT CU INC ↗
  • Who funds SUNNYHILL INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFEBRIDGE PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds HOUSE OF PAIS ↗
  • Who funds UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds PREFERRED FAMILY HEALTHCARE INC ↗
  • Who funds WORTH INDUSTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds PARAQUAD INC ↗
  • Who funds CANTERBURY ENTERPRISES INC ↗
  • Who funds RECREATION COUNCIL OF GREATER ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds ARTIST FIRST ↗
  • Who funds OPTIONS FOR JUSTICE FOR PERSONS WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY ADVOCACY AND COMMUNITY TRAINING INC ↗
  • Who funds EPWORTH CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLAND INDUSTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds VARIETY THE CHILDRENS CHARITY OF ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY REGION YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FOCUS ON RESIDENTIAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds PATHWAYS TO INDEPENDENCE ↗
  • Who funds TABERNACLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds JUDEVINE INC ↗
  • Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF GREATER ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS ↗
  • Who funds RISE INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Fo…United Way of Greater…St Louis Community Fo…World Wide Technology…Employees Community F…Commerce Bancshares F…Centene FoundationJordan Mary R & Ettie…Veterans United Found…Jefferson FoundationEdward Jones Foundati…Pott Foundation
St Louis Community FoundationMO41.2× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · St Louis Community Foundation Inc · World Wide Technology Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Centene Foundation · Jordan Mary R & Ettie a Charitable · Veterans United Foundation · Jefferson Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Pott Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization St Louis Office for Developmental Disability Resources funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
23report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to St Louis Office for Developmental Disability Resources?

Find your warmest path to St Louis Office for Developmental Disability Resources through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines