Skip to content
Ssm Health Care St Louis at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Ssm Health Care St Louis

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

$3.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$5.3MCommunity Improvement$464kPublic Benefit$464kPhilanthropy$432kFood & Nutrition$292kEducation$288kReligion$181kHuman Services$126kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $2,928,890, the rows itemized in this filing. The $3,085,930 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $157,040 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $104k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $432k
  • $250k+2 grants · $2.4M
$49,408
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SSM HEALTH FOUNDATION - ST LOUIS$1,984,653
ST LOUIS COUNTY$377,105
SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY$209,806
ST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK$145,000
ARCHDIOCESE OF ST LOUIS$77,558
COMPASS HEALTH INC$49,408
THE SALVATION ARMY$30,000
POWER4STL$25,000
FENTON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$8,500
ST CHARLES CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$7,880
TEAM ACTIVITIES FOR SPECIAL KIDS INC$7,500
OPERATION FOOD SEARCH$6,480
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Youth In Need: $8k → 5%Youth In Need: $6k → 5%Youth In Need: $6k → 5%Youth in Need: $6k → 5%Youth in Need: $6k → 5%ST LOUIS AREA DIAPER BANK: $12k → 11%St Louis Area Diaper Bank: $6k → 11%Helping Hand Me Downs: $10k → 11%Helping Hand Me Downs: $10k → 11%Helping Hand Me Downs: $7k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.0M · 18 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
25

Total granted

$6.0M
$946k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+3%

Still filing today

83%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $308k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionEnvironmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    ST CHARLES COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL
    5× · 2017–2022 · $188k · revenue +14%
  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATION IN FAMILY MEDICINE
    2× · 2022–2023 · $79k · revenue +29%
  • PR
    PINK RIBBON GOOD INC
    3× · 2019–2022 · $75k · revenue +164%

Funded once

  • SL
    St Louis County CORE Grant
    one grant, 2022 · $348k
  • SL
    ST LOUIS COUNTY
    one grant, 2023 · $115k
  • MH
    Missouri Hospital Association
    one grant, 2020 · $102k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Louis Economic Development Partnership

Economic development.

—
2
Ssm Health Care St Louis

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

Health
3
St Louis Council of Construction Consumers

The slc3 is a community of design and construction industry professionals with a common interest in the betterment of our region through prioritizing innovation, continuing education, equity empowerment and all-inclusive workforce…

Community Improvement
4
Greater St Louis Inc

Greater st. louis, inc. brings together business and civic leaders to create jobs, drive inclusive economic growth, and increase the st. louis metro area's global competitiveness. we speak with a unified voice, lead with a bold agenda, and…

Community Improvement
5
Ssm Health Foundation - St Louis

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the health presence of god.

—
6
St Charles Health System Inc

To own, manage and operate hospitals in Central Oregon, as well as the care of sick, injured and infirm and the carrying on, participation in and sponsorship of health-related services and activities in the communities.

Health
7
Chamber of Commerce of Greater Kansas City

Leading the way to the best kc region by convening innovative leaders, collaborating with like-minded organizations, advocating for positive change, and helping small businesses grow.

—
8
Missouri Chamber of Commerce & Industry

To protect, serve and advance missouri business.

—
9
Community Council of St Charles County

For over 70 years, the Community Council of St. Charles County has been dedicated to bringing people together to build stronger, more resilient communities. Our Mission is to connect nonprofits, service providers, government entities, and…

—
10
Mission St Louis

Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.

Community Improvement
11
Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce

Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.

—
12
St Louis Regional Economic Development Alliance

Alliance stl is the business attraction initiative of greater st. louis, inc. greater st. louis, inc. is a nonprofit investor-supported organization comprised of businesses, institutions and organizations of all sizes that reflect the full…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Health Commission of Missouri; the most unlike its peers is Daisy Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/44
Grantees still filing
25/44
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SSM HEALTH FOUNDATION: $4,463,527 · OtherSSM HEALTH FOUNDATIONARCHDIOCESE OF ST LOUIS: $446,731 · OtherARCHDIOCESE OF ST LOUISSt Louis County CORE Grant: $348,486 · OtherSt Louis County CORE GrantST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $269,000 · Other+27 more: $977,677 · Other+27 moreST LOUIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $377,105 · PhilanthropyST LOUIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $55,000 · PhilanthropyINSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATION IN FAMILY MEDICINE: $79,271 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $75,251 · HealthPINK RIBBON GOOD INC: $75,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH COMMISSION OF MISSOURI: $50,000 · HealthCOMPASS HEALTH INC: $49,408 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $30,000 · HealthUNITED SERVICES FOR CHILDREN: $20,530 · HealthSSM CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $20,000 · Health+3 more: $20,219 · HealthST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $209,806 · EducationST CHARLES CITY COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationYOUTH IN NEED: $30,600 · Human ServicesHELPING HAND ME DOWNS: $26,667 · Human ServicesST LOUIS AREA DIAPER BANK: $17,595 · Human ServicesHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $40,000 · InternationalSTL YOUTH JOBS: $30,000 · Youth Development
Other$6,505,421Philanthropy$432,105Health$419,679Education$219,806Human Services$74,862International$40,000Youth Development$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST LOUIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $377,105 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetST LOUIS AREA FOOD BANK INC: $269,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $209,806 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST LOUIS REGIONAL CHAMBER & GROWTH ASSOCIATION: $207,010 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetST CHARLES COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL: $187,925 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetMissouri Hospital Association: $101,833 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATION IN FAMILY MEDICINE: $79,271 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $75,251 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPINK RIBBON GOOD INC: $75,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetST LOUIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetST PATRICK CENTER: $53,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH COMMISSION OF MISSOURI: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOMPASS HEALTH INC: $49,408 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH IN NEED: $30,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING HAND ME DOWNS: $26,667 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetPOWER4STL: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetST CHARLES COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $24,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetUNITED SERVICES FOR CHILDREN: $20,530 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSSM CARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTER: $20,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetST LOUIS AREA DIAPER BANK: $17,595 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMissouri Coalition for the Environment Foundation: $15,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetGreater North County Chamber of Com: $13,510 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetOPERATION FOOD SEARCH INC: $13,380 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCARDINAL GLENNON CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST CHARLES CITY COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetKirkwood-Des Peres Area Chamber of Commerce: $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetFENTON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC: $8,500 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetFENTON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $8,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetST CHARLES AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $7,880 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetDAISY FOUNDATION: $7,685 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST CHARLES CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $7,650 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetKAREN WEIDINGER FOUNDATION: $7,534 over 1y, 13% of budgetST LOUIS SPORTS COMMISSION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTEAM ACTIVITIES FOR SPECIAL KIDS INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCLAYTON CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $7,500 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetMISSOURI STATE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION PHYSICIANS HEALTH FOUNDATION: $5,750 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCHILD CENTER-MARYGROVE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

St Louis Community Fo…United Way of Greater…World Wide Technology…Washington UniversityCommerce Bancshares F…Brown Dana Charitable…Youthbridge Community…Employees Community F…Mercy Hospitals East …Community Impact Netw…The Four Leaf Clover …Pecha Family Foundati…
St Louis Community Foundation IncMO22.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · World Wide Technology Foundation · Washington University · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Brown Dana Charitable Trust · Youthbridge Community Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Mercy Hospitals East Communities · Community Impact Network · The Four Leaf Clover Foundation · Pecha Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ssm Health Care St Louis funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ssm Health Care St Louis. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ssm Health Care St Louis’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home