Skip to content

· Public charity

Springfield Black Tie Inc

Southwest missouri's premier fundraising event benefiting local and state- wide charities which serve the lgbt community.

$264k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$69k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Civil Rights$389kHealth$181kHousing & Shelter$103kHuman Services$84kArts & Culture$65kYouth Development$49kEducation$49kReligion$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $24k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $167k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $69k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$362k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GLO CENTER$69,000
PFLAG OF THE OZARKS$30,750
AIDS PROJECT OF THE OZARKS$28,000
MSU FOUNDATION$26,800
THE KITCHEN$26,112
FOSTERADOPT CONNECT$20,000
UNITED MINISTRIES IN HIGHER EDUCATI$15,000
NATIONAL AVE CHRISTIAN CHURCH$10,000
SPRINGFIELD ART MUSEUM$10,000
MEN'S CHORUS OF THE OZARKS$8,000
AMERICAN INDIAN CENTER OF SPFD MO$8,000
THE VICTIM CENTER$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $224k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%EMPOWER MISSOURI: $11k → 10%PROMO FUND: $16k → 11%FOSTERADOPT CONNECT: $20k → 15%PROMO FUND: $15k → 11%FOSTERADOPT CONNECT: $15k → 15%PROMO FUND: $15k → 11%FOSTERADOPT CONNECT: $13k → 15%THE KITCHEN: $29k → 15%THE KITCHEN: $28k → 15%THE KITCHEN: $26k → 15%THE KITCHEN: $20k → 15%OZARKS REGIONAL YMCA: $10k → 15%OZARKS REGIONAL YMCA: $8k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$898k · 13 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
5

Total granted

$898k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+136%
+355%

Still filing today

62%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCivil RightsEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GA
    GAY AND LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE OZARKS
    6× · 2017–2024 · $227k · revenue +153% · 84% of their budget
  • AP
    AIDS PROJECT OF THE OZARKS
    6× · 2017–2024 · $159k · revenue +206%
  • FC
    FOSTERADOPT CONNECT INC
    3× · 2018–2024 · $47k · revenue +187%

Funded once

  • EM
    EMPOWER MISSOURIgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue +355%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • SL
    SPRINGFIELD LITTLE THEATRE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue +56%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Missouri Family Health Council Inc

We exist to ensure that everyone - no matter their income, geography, identity, or circumstances - can access high-quality sexual and reproductive healthcare.

Health
2
Kansas City Anti Violence Project

To provide advocacy services to LGBTQ victims and survivors of domestic violence, sexual assault, and hate crimes.

—
3
Good Samaritan Project Inc

To provide advocacy, care and education to those affected by hiv/aids and other sexually transmitted diseases.

Health
4
Forward Through Ferguson

Embracing the ferguson commission's mandate, forward through ferguson centers impacted communities and mobilizes accountable bodies to advance racially equitable systems and policies that ensure all people in the st. louis region can…

Civil Rights
5
Outfront Minnesota Community Services

Outfront's mission is to create a state where lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (lgbtq) people are free to be who they are, love who they love, and live without fear of violence, harassment or discrimination. in our effort to…

—
6
Writers Planners Trainers

To advocate, educate, and act as a resource for the east st. louis metropolitan area. specializing in linkage to care, referrals to wrap-around services, and other supportive assistance to region 4s most vulnerable populations. providing…

Health
7
Missouri Coalition Against Domestic and Sexual Violence

The missouri coalition against domestic and sexual violence (mocadsv) is the membership coalition that unites missourians with a common value that rape and abuse must end, and advances this through education, alliance, research, and public…

—
8
Pflag Springfield Swmo

To create a caring, just, and affirming world for LGBTQ+ people and those who love them.

—
9
St Louis Effort for Aids Inc

To provide education on the prevention of hiv/aids and to provide comprehensive support services to those affected by the disease.

—
10
Arc of the Ozarks

To be a leader in service delivery for persons with disabilities by providing an array of supports and services to integrate them into their communities and to enhance the quality of their lives.

—
11
Mission St Louis

Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.

Community Improvement
12
Muscatine Center for Social Action

Mcsa provides housing, basic health care, educational and vocational support services for those in need in muscatine county while working to reduce these needs through long-term social change in the community.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fosteradopt Connect Inc; the most unlike its peers is Aids Project of the Ozarks. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PFLAG OF THE OZARKS: $115,680 · OtherPFLAG OF THE OZARKSRARE BREED YOUTH SERVICES: $43,636 · OtherRARE BREED YOUTH SERVICESMENS CHORUS OF THE OZARKS: $34,559 · OtherMENS CHORUS OF THE OZARKSNATIONAL AVE CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $25,000 · OtherNATIONAL AVE CHRISTIAN CHURCHSPRINGFIELD ART MUSEUM: $22,500 · OtherSPRINGFIELD ART MUSEUMUNITED MINISTRIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · Other+3 more: $19,634 · Other+3 moreGAY AND LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE OZARKS: $227,474 · Civil RightsGAY AND LESBIAN COMMUNITY …THE KITCHEN INC: $102,813 · Human ServicesTHE KITCHEN INCFOSTERADOPT CONNECT INC: $47,464 · Human ServicesFOSTERADOPT CONNECT INCPROMO FUND: $45,672 · Human ServicesPROMO FUNDOZARKS REGIONAL YMCA: $17,500 · Human ServicesOZARKS REGIONAL YMCAEMPOWER MISSOURI: $10,620 · Human ServicesAIDS PROJECT OF THE OZARKS: $159,483 · HealthAIDS PROJECT OF THE O…THE VICTIM CENTER: $21,984 · HealthTHE VICTIM CENTERMISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $34,081 · EducationSPRINGFIELD LITTLE THEATRE INC: $8,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$286,009Civil Rights$227,474Human Services$224,069Health$181,467Education$34,081Arts & Culture$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGAY AND LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE OZARKS: $227,474 over 6y, 84% of budgetAIDS PROJECT OF THE OZARKS: $159,483 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE KITCHEN INC: $102,813 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetFOSTERADOPT CONNECT INC: $47,464 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPROMO FUND: $45,672 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetMISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $34,081 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE VICTIM CENTER: $21,984 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetOZARKS REGIONAL YMCA: $17,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSPRINGFIELD LITTLE THEATRE INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GAY AND LESBIAN COMMUNITY CENTER OF THE OZARKS ↗
  • Who funds AIDS PROJECT OF THE OZARKS ↗
  • Who funds THE KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds FOSTERADOPT CONNECT INC ↗
  • Who funds PROMO FUND ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE VICTIM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds OZARKS REGIONAL YMCA ↗
  • Who funds EMPOWER MISSOURI ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGFIELD LITTLE THEATRE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Ozarks IncMO23.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Musgrave Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Springfield Black Tie Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Springfield Black Tie Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Springfield Black Tie Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Springfield Black Tie Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Springfield Black Tie’s filings →

    More from the funding graph