Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sporty's Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$694kArts & Culture$313kPublic Safety & Disaster$218kScience & Tech$166kRecreation & Sports$16kEmployment$6kYouth Development$5kHealth$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$95k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI$20,000
AIRCRAFT ELECTRONICS ASSOCIATION$6,000
AVIT FLIGHT ACADEMY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
DAN BEARD COUNCIL$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
INDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%RECREATIONAL AVIATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%PATIENT AIRLIFT SERVICES: $1k → 7%RECREATIONAL AVIATION FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%PATIENT AIRLIFT SERVICES: $1k → 7%RECREATIONAL AVIATION FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
WI
MI
NY
OR
NV
IN
OH
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
DC
HI
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 25% of Sporty's Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Sporty's Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 19 repeat orgs$297k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +38% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
39

Total granted

$1.1M
$277k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+38%

Still filing today

53%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesScience & TechPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EA
    EXPERIMENTAL AIRCRAFT ASSOCIATION INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $133k · revenue +35%
  • TA
    THE AOPA FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $50k · revenue +85%
  • TC
    THE COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE
    3× · 2019–2021 · $40k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • DC
    DULUTH CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC
    one grant, 2017 · $69k · revenue +17%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $69k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $60k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Airpower Museum Co Cockpit Cpt Usa Llc
—
2
The Yanks Air Museum
Arts & Culture
3
Flying Leatherneck Aviation Museum
—
4
Eagles Mere Air Museum Foundation
Arts & Culture
5
Military Aviation Museum Foundation

The foundation supports the military aviation museum.

Arts & Culture
6
Strategic Air Command & Aerospace Museum

The mission of the sac museum is to celebrate our heritage, preserve our artifacts, and inspire learning.

Arts & Culture
7
Connecticut Aeronautical Historical Association Inc

The new england air museum's mission is to preserve and present the story of aviation and aerospace, with an emphasis on new england's role, and the genius and inspiration that made it possible. the museum also seeks to inspire young…

Arts & Culture
8
North Cascades Vintage Aircraft Museum
—
9
Military Aviation Museum

The military aviation museum honors the heroes who built, flew and maintained america's military aircraft. by sharing their stories through exhibitions and events, we promote an understanding of history, science, service and sacrifice that…

Arts & Culture
10
Air Transport Association of America Inc

Airlines for america (a4a) vigorously advocates for america's airlines as models of safety, customer service, and environmental responsibility; and as the indispensable network that drives our nation's economy and global…

—
11
Kentucky Aviation Museum Inc
Arts & Culture
12
American Fighter Aces Association

Collect and preserve historical data, artifacts, and scientific objects with regard to the country's fighter aces, its military aviation and aviators' history. educate the public about the experience in military combat and offer…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Air Force Museum Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Smithsonian Institution. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
17/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI: $180,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATIDAN BEARD COUNCIL: $176,500 · OtherDAN BEARD COUNCILBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $165,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICAEAA FOUNDATION: $90,000 · OtherEAA FOUNDATIONEASTERN CINCINNATI AVIATION INC: $88,632 · OtherEASTERN CINCINNATI AVIATION INCIndividual grant recipient: $68,735 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+39 more: $153,141 · Other+39 moreAVIATION FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $120,000 · Arts & CultureAVIATION FOUNDATION…DULUTH CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $68,735 · Arts & CultureDULUTH CHILDREN'S M…THE COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE: $40,000 · Arts & CultureTHE COMMEMORATIVE A…+7 more: $13,400 · Arts & Culture+7 moreEXPERIMENTAL AIRCRAFT ASSOCIATION INC: $133,334 · Science & TechEXPERIMENT…THE AOPA FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Public Safety & DisasterRECREATIONAL AVIATION FOUNDATION: $16,000 · Human ServicesPATIENT AIRLIFT SERVICES INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN IN AVIATION INTERNATIONAL INC: $6,126 · EducationNEW VISION AVIATION: $2,500 · EducationINDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $2,500 · Education
Other$982,008Arts & Culture$242,135Science & Tech$133,334Public Safety & Disaster$50,000Human Services$18,000Education$11,126

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEXPERIMENTAL AIRCRAFT ASSOCIATION INC: $133,334 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDULUTH CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $68,735 over 1y, 13% of budgetTHE AOPA FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE: $40,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAIRCRAFT ELECTRONICS ASSOCIATION: $27,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetRECREATIONAL AVIATION FOUNDATION: $16,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetWOMEN IN AVIATION INTERNATIONAL INC: $6,126 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSEAPLANE PILOTS ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAVAL AVIATION MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL WASP WWII MUSEUM INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetADMIRAL NIMITZ FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYANKEE AIR MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPATIENT AIRLIFT SERVICES INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL WOMEN'S AIR & SPACE MUSEUM INC: $1,400 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetThe Eisenhower Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AIR FORCE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EXPERIMENTAL AIRCRAFT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AVIATION FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds DULUTH CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AOPA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE ↗
  • Who funds AIRCRAFT ELECTRONICS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds RECREATIONAL AVIATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN IN AVIATION INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SEAPLANE PILOTS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds NAVAL AVIATION MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW VISION AVIATION ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ge Aerospace FoundationCT10.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sporty's Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sporty's Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Naval Aviation Museum Foundation Inc: 13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sporty's Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Sporty's Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 63 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sporty's’ filings →

More from the funding graph