Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Spiller L'Chaim Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$36k
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0187% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$55kReligion$39kHealth$30kArts & Culture$22kFood & Nutrition$20kCommunity Improvement$20kRecreation & Sports$9kEnvironment$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k30 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$500
Median grant
6
States reached
$825k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO$10,000
OPEN ARMS MINNESOTA$5,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$2,500
THE BLAKE SCHOOL$2,500
BETH EL SYNAGOGUE$1,800
AMERICAN CAMPING ASSOCIATION$1,000
STEP$1,000
TWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION$1,000
PEASE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,000
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT FUND$1,000
MIA$1,000
MINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DOING GOOD TOGETHER: $1k → 11%DOING GOOD TOGETHER: $500 → 11%DOING GOOD TOGETHER: $250 → 11%DOING GOOD TOGETHER: $250 → 11%DOING GOOD TOGETHER: $250 → 11%DOING GOOD TOGETHER: $250 → 11%OPEN ARMS MINNESOTA: $5k → 11%OPEN ARMS MINNESOTA: $5k → 11%OPEN ARMS MINNESOTA: $3k → 11%OPEN ARMS MINNESOTA: $1k → 11%OPEN ARMS MINNESOTA: $1k → 11%DOING GOOD TOGETHER: $250 → 11%DOING GOOD TOGETHER: $250 → 11%DOING GOOD TOGETHER: $250 → 11%SPARK - Y: $250 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
NY
SD
IN
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
TN
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$221k · 41 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

41 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
12

Total granted

$221k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+50%

Still filing today

63%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureInternationalCommunity ImprovementHealthHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BLAKE SCHOOL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $30k · revenue +8%
  • CR
    COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT FUND INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $15k · revenue +88%
  • OA
    OPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA
    5× · 2021–2025 · $15k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • N
    NECHAMA
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • EM
    EVERY MEALgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +558%
  • GH
    GLOBAL HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $1k · revenue -19%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

2
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

3
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

4
The Minneapolis Foundation

The foundation cultivates generosity by taking action on the greatest civic, social, and economic needs partnering with nonprofits, facilitating grantmaking, driving research and advocacy, and providing services to donors seeking to make a…

Philanthropy
5
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
6
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

7
Minneapolis Saint Paul Regional Economic Development Partnership

The mission of the greater msp partnership is to accelerate regional competitiveness and inclusive economic growth through job creation, capital investment and execution of strategic initiatives. the partnership works to strengthen our…

Community Improvement
8
Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation

Purpose: we inspire, advocate and invest to advance community visions. continued on sch o

Philanthropy
9
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
10
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
Minnesota Land Trust

The minnesota land trust protects and restores minnesota's most vital natural lands in order to provide wildlife habitat, clean water, outdoor experiences and scenic beauty for generations to come.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Minneapolis Jewish Federation and the most unlike its peers is Camp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFood Pantries & AssistanceGovernment Accountability R…Land Conservation Organizat…Classical Music EnsemblesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Affordable Housing Developm…Community Arts OrganizationsPublic University Foundatio…Education Equity LeadershipAnimal Rescue and AdoptionSmall Business Development …Native Hawaiian Community D…Independent K-8 SchoolsJewish Community Federations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%0%<5yr12%2%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr17%21%20–35yr16%33%35–55yr18%33%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%0%<5yr12%0%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr17%21%20–35yr16%45%35–55yr18%30%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/42
the rest of the field
10%
3,829/38,947

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/42
Grantees still filing
30/42
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BETH EL SYNAGOGUE — $39,300 · OtherBETH EL SYNAGOGUEHENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $6,000 · OtherHENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY FOUNDATIONSTEP — $4,250 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $3,850 · OtherWESTMINISTER TOWN HALL FORUM — $3,600 · Other+33 more — $49,400 · Other+33 moreTHE BLAKE SCHOOL — $30,250 · EducationTHE BLAKE SCHOOLAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY — $11,250 · EducationAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVER…PEASE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $3,000 · EducationPEASE COMMUNITY FOUNDA…THE COLORADO COLLEGE — $2,000 · Education+2 more — $1,000 · EducationGILDA'S CLUB TWIN CITIES INC — $12,500 · HealthGILDA'S CLU…American Heart Association Inc — $10,250 · HealthAmerican He…GLOBAL HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC — $1,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY REINVESTMENT FUND INC — $15,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY…NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN MINNESOTA (MN) SECTION — $2,500 · Community ImprovementNATIONAL …Linden Hills Neighborhood Council — $2,000 · Community ImprovementLinden Hi…MINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA — $11,000 · Arts & CultureMINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION — $3,500 · Arts & CultureSuicide Awareness Voices of Education — $2,500 · Arts & Culture+3 more — $1,500 · Arts & CultureOPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA — $14,500 · Human ServicesDOING GOOD TOGETHER — $3,250 · Human Services+1 more — $250 · Human ServicesMinneapolis Parks Foundation — $7,700 · Recreation & Sports
Other$106,400Education$47,500Health$23,750Community Improvement$19,500Arts & Culture$18,500Human Services$18,000Recreation & Sports$7,700

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE BLAKE SCHOOL — $30,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY REINVESTMENT FUND INC — $15,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA — $14,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGILDA'S CLUB TWIN CITIES INC — $12,500 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY — $11,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA — $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $10,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMinneapolis Parks Foundation — $7,700 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetMINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION — $3,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDOING GOOD TOGETHER — $3,250 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SANNEH FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPEASE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $2,700 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Humane Society — $2,600 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN MINNESOTA (MN) SECTION — $2,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetMINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION — $2,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSuicide Awareness Voices of Education — $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COLORADO COLLEGE — $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLinden Hills Neighborhood Council — $2,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetJEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF THE UPPER MIDWEST — $2,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNative American Heritage Association — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONSERVATION CORPS — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CAMPING ASSOCIATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALIGHT — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINT'L ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CHARITIES INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBucknell University — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOLOCAUST REMEMBRANCE FOUNDATION OF THE VALLEY — $500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetFIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCamp — $500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWALKER ART CENTER — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BLAKE SCHOOL
  • Who funds COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT FUND INC
  • Who funds OPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA
  • Who funds GILDA'S CLUB TWIN CITIES INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds MINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds Minneapolis Parks Foundation
  • Who funds MINNESOTA ORCHESTRAL ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds DOING GOOD TOGETHER
  • Who funds THE SANNEH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PEASE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Animal Humane Society
  • Who funds EVERY MEAL
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN MINNESOTA (MN) SECTION
  • Who funds MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION
  • Who funds Suicide Awareness Voices of Education
  • Who funds THE COLORADO COLLEGE
  • Who funds Linden Hills Neighborhood Council
  • Who funds JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF THE UPPER MIDWEST
  • Who funds Native American Heritage Association
  • Who funds CONSERVATION CORPS
  • Who funds TWIN CITIES HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
  • Who funds AMERICAN CAMPING ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC
  • Who funds GLOBAL HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mightycause Charitable FoundationFL20.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Spiller L'Chaim Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Int'l Orthodox Christian Charities Inc7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Spiller L'Chaim Fund?

Find your warmest path to Spiller L'Chaim Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph