· Private foundation
Spiegel Family Burn Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k13 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $84k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION | $21,000 |
| PHOENIX SOCIETY BURN SURVIVORS | $20,000 |
| FLCCC ALLIANCE | $12,500 |
| MY SCARS ARE BEAUTIFUL | $10,000 |
| FIREFIGHTERS OF SOUTHERN NEVADA BURN FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| BURN INSTITUTE SAN DIEGO | $10,000 |
| NEVADA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $9,500 |
| SAM'S POSSE | $5,000 |
| THE ANIMAL FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| WORDS ALIVE | $2,000 |
| ANGEL FACES | $2,000 |
| VOICES FOR CHILDREN | $2,000 |
| GIVE TRIBE | $1,500 |
| IMPACT LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION | $1,030 |
| GENTLE CAROUSEL MINATURE THERAPHY HORSES | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $78k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
24 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WAWords Alive7× · 2018–2024 · $8k · revenue +52%
- VFVOICES FOR CHILDREN5× · 2020–2024 · $7k · revenue +14%
- IFINSTITUTE FOR NATURAL MEDICINE2× · 2022–2024 · $2k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- BFBURN FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +30%
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDRENgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $18k · revenue +67%- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $18k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To remove the "no pets allowed" sign on the doors of domestic violence shelters. women should not have to choose between leaving their abuser and leaving their pets behind to be abused.
The mission of Beyond the Burn Foundation is to support burn survivors and empower communities through direct relief, strategic investments in burn care research, and partnerships that improve outcomes for those affected by burn trauma.
To foster strategic alliances in the health care community, collaborating on workforce issues and being a proactive force for legislative initiatives to improve access and the delivery of health care in southern nevada.
Nevada HealthRight exists to serve the forensic healthcare needs of Nevada residents and visitors by providing excellence in clinical forensic healthcare services, violence prevention, education, and research.
Safe Embrace is committed to ending the cycle of domestic and sexual violence with innovative prevention and intervention services. We help victims of domestic abuse, sexual assault, and human trafficking become survivors by providing…
The mission of firefighters for healing is to support burn and trauma survivors through direct emotional and financial support at the time they most need it. firefighters for healing provides innovative and holistic solutions to support…
To provide social, emotional, educational, and psychological support and programs to families of all children diagnosed with life threatening or critical illnesses and provide healing arts and wellness programs to adults touched by cancer…
MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…
Through feeding the hungry, support, and care, we provide redemption, recovery, and re-entry to the homeless, addicted, and those in need.
Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…
To improve the quality of life of burn survivors and their families while promoting burn prevention, advocacy, and education.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Burn Foundation of America Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEVADA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FIREFIGHTERS OF SOUTHERN NEVADA BURN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BURN FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds ANGEL FACES ↗
- Who funds Words Alive ↗
- Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds Burn Survivors of New England Inc ↗
- Who funds OUR RESCUE ↗
- Who funds WEST COAST TORAH CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE ANIMAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR NATURAL MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds Translifeline DBA Trans Lifeline ↗
- Who funds PROFESSIONAL FIRE FIGHTERS OF NEVADA ↗
- Who funds WALTER HOVING HOME INC DBA HOVING HOME ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds IMPACT LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds Mercury One Inc ↗
- Who funds FIREFIGHTERS BURN INSTITUTE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Mondays Dark · Engelstad Family Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Spiegel Family Burn Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.