Skip to content

Montana · Private foundation

Knight Foundation CO M Scholz

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
19
Grants FY2025
17
Organizations funded FY2024
6%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$2,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$10,000
Organizations funded a year
17 to 21
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
1
Total assets, FY2025
$1.0M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 6% of the organizations Knight Foundation CO M Scholz funded were first-time grantees, receiving 1% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving19$60k0%
FY202417$47k6%
FY202321$66k0%
FY202221$75k10%
FY202121$55k0%
FY202021$80k0%
FY201919$63k5%
FY201821$54k14%
96% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$90kHuman Services$89kPhilanthropy$74kRecreation & Sports$51kReligion$43kEducation$43kFood & Nutrition$42kAnimals$39kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Eagle Mount$69,75091%
Soldiers Chapel Corporation$43,4009n/a
Heart of the Valley Inc$38,50090%
Cancer Support Community of Montana$35,80091%
Wellness in Action$20,00092%
Big Sky Community Organization$19,50080%
Gallatin River Task Force$17,50080%
Montana Hope Project Inc$17,50091%
Aware Inc$17,00090%
Friends of Big Sky Education$16,25070%
Show all 17 grantees
All grantees of Knight Foundation CO M Scholz by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Eagle Mount$69,75091%
Soldiers Chapel Corporation$43,4009n/a
Heart of the Valley Inc$38,50090%
Cancer Support Community of Montana$35,80091%
Wellness in Action$20,00092%
Big Sky Community Organization$19,50080%
Gallatin River Task Force$17,50080%
Montana Hope Project Inc$17,50091%
Aware Inc$17,00090%
Friends of Big Sky Education$16,25070%
Big Sky Community Housing Trust Bscht$15,00040%
Warriors & Quiet Waters Foundation Inc$14,50090%
Morningstar Learning Center Inc$12,00080%
The Montana Land Reliance$9,50070%
Big Sky Skating & Hockey Association Inc$9,50052%
Family Promise of Gallatin Valley Inc$8,44030%
Gallatin Valley Land Trust$1,00020%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 9 recipients with no EIN on record ($173k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Knight Foundation CO M Scholz supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEagle Mount: $69,750 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetHeart of the Valley Inc: $38,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetCancer Support Community of Montana: $35,800 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetWellness in Action: $20,000 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetBig Sky Community Organization: $19,500 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetGallatin River Task Force: $17,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetMontana Hope Project Inc: $17,500 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetAware Inc: $17,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFriends of Big Sky Education: $16,250 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetBig Sky Community Housing Trust Bscht: $15,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWarriors & Quiet Waters Foundation Inc: $14,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetMorningstar Learning Center Inc: $12,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetThe Montana Land Reliance: $9,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBig Sky Skating & Hockey Association Inc: $9,500 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetFamily Promise of Gallatin Valley Inc: $8,440 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGallatin Valley Land Trust: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 16.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Yellowstone Club Community FoundationMT24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Yellowstone Club Community Foundation · One Valley Community Foundation · Spanish Peaks Community Foundation · Moonlight Community Foundation · Montana Community Foundation Inc · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Rieschel Foundation · Prometheus Charitable Trust · Michael D Arneson and Susan H Arneson · Harold W Sweatt Foundation · Glore Fund · The Carter Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Knight Foundation CO M Scholz with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Knight Foundation CO M Scholz?

Find your warmest path to Knight Foundation CO M Scholz through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Knight Foundation CO M Scholz

How much does Knight Foundation CO M Scholz give?
Knight Foundation CO M Scholz reported 19 grants totaling $60,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 17 and 21 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Knight Foundation CO M Scholz fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Health (17%), Human Services (16%), Philanthropy (14%).
Who are Knight Foundation CO M Scholz's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Eagle Mount ($70k), Soldiers Chapel Corporation ($43k), Heart of the Valley Inc ($39k).
Does Knight Foundation CO M Scholz fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 6% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Knight Foundation CO M Scholz accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Knight Foundation CO M Scholz?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Yellowstone Club Community Foundation, One Valley Community Foundation, Spanish Peaks Community Foundation.
Where is Knight Foundation CO M Scholz based?
Knight Foundation CO M Scholz is based in MT.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Knight Foundation CO M Scholz’s filings →

More from the funding graph