Skip to content
Southwestern Medical Clinic Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Southwestern Medical Clinic Foundation

None

$80k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$192kPublic Benefit$191kInternational$83kReligion$46kEducation$10k
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $49,491, the rows itemized in this filing. The $80,326 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $30,835 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$15,950
Median grant
3
States reached
$122k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ADELFICUKARAND MISSION HOSPITAL$22,141
WORLD GOSPEL MISSION$15,950
WORLDWIDE LAB IMPROVEMENT$11,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AFRICAN MISSION HEALTHCARE: $31k → 12%INTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FNDN: $10k → 12%WORLDWIDE LAB IMPROVEMENT: $11k → 12%LAKELAND HOSPITAL: $41k → 15%MOBILITY WORLDWIDE: $10k → 17%PROJECT MEDSEND: $6k → 9%SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $6k → 21%OMF INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 8%CROSSPOINT GLOBAL HEALTH: $31k → 13%WORLD GOSPEL MISSION: $16k → 19%CAMEROON BAPTIST CONV HEALTH BOARD: $50k → 9%ANDREWS UNIVERSITY: $10k → 15%CROSSPOINT GLOBAL HEALTH: $15k → 13%WORLD GOSPEL MISSION: $10k → 19%VISION OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
SD
IN
CT
CA
CO
MO
TN
NC
DC
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $19k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Middle East and North Africa$19k · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: CHARITY SUPPORT

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$321k · 5 repeat orgs$191k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
10

Total granted

$321k
$180k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+15%

Still filing today

40%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthEducationPublic BenefitReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ADELFI CREDIT UNION
    3× · 2021–2023 · $191k · revenue +24%
  • CG
    CROSSPOINT GLOBAL HEALTH INC
    2× · 2021–2024 · $46k
  • AM
    ADELFICUKARAND MISSION HOSPITAL
    2× · 2024–2025 · $42k

Funded once

  • CB
    CAMEROON BAPTIST CONV HEALTH BOARD
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • LH
    Lakeland Hospitals at Niles and St Joseph Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $41k · revenue +8%
  • AM
    African Mission Healthcare Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $31k · revenue -37%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
2
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
3
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
4
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
5
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
6
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
7
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
8
Corus International Inc

TO MANAGE AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH, AND RELIEF FOCUSED FAMILY OF ORGANIZATIONS HELPING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES LIFT THEMSELVES OUT OF POVERTY, SUPPORT WELL-BEING OF INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES, AND PROVIDE…

Human Services
9
Christian World Outreach

Providing responsible evangelism, leadership, development, and humanitarian assistance.

Employment
10
Devworks International

Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

Human Services
11
Union Foundation Us

Rigorous biblical and accessible education, training and resources for churches worldwide.

Religion
12
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Project Medsend; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CAMEROON BAPTIST CONV HEALTH BOARD: $50,100 · OtherCAMEROON BAPTIST CONV HEALTH BOARDCROSSPOINT GLOBAL HEALTH INC: $46,382 · OtherCROSSPOINT GLOBAL HEALTH INCADELFICUKARAND MISSION HOSPITAL: $42,273 · OtherADELFICUKARAND MISSION HOSPITALWORLD GOSPEL MISSION: $26,360 · OtherWORLD GOSPEL MISSIONSERGE GLOBAL INC: $15,025 · OtherSERGE GLOBAL INCOMF INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 · Other+1 more: $6,200 · OtherADELFI CREDIT UNION: $190,684 · Public BenefitADELFI CREDIT UNIONAfrican Mission Healthcare Foundation: $31,000 · InternationalAfrican Mis…WORLDWIDE LAB IMPROVEMENTS INC: $11,400 · InternationalWORLDWIDE L…MOBILITY WORLDWIDE: $10,000 · InternationalMOBILITY WO…Lakeland Hospitals at Niles and St Joseph Inc: $40,690 · HealthLakeland Ho…VISION OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 · HealthVISION OUTR…ANDREWS UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationPROJECT MEDSEND: $6,000 · EducationINTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FOUNDATION TRUST: $10,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,925 · Religion
Other$196,340Public Benefit$190,684International$52,400Health$50,690Education$16,000Religion$15,925

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetADELFI CREDIT UNION: $190,684 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAfrican Mission Healthcare Foundation: $31,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSERGE GLOBAL INC: $15,025 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOBILITY WORLDWIDE: $10,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetVISION OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL GENEROSITY FOUNDATION TRUST: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANDREWS UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT MEDSEND: $6,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,925 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charit…National Philanthropi…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Southwestern Medical Clinic Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Southwestern Medical Clinic Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Southwestern Medical Clinic Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Southwestern Medical Clinic Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Southwestern Medical Clinic’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home