Skip to content

· Private foundation

Southpole Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$490k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.3MHuman Services$460kHealth$255kPhilanthropy$113kCommunity Improvement$100kArts & Culture$74kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k25 grants · $485k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$9.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KCS$35,000
BERGEN COMMUNITY COLLEGE$30,000
UNION COUNTY COLLEGE$20,000
BMCC$20,000
FLUSHING YMCA$20,000
MILAL$20,000
HOSTOS COMMUNITY COLLEGE$20,000
STELLA & CHARLES GUTTMAN FOUNDATION$20,000
LAGUARDIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE$20,000
KAFSC$20,000
GIVE CHANCES INC$20,000
QUEENSBOROUGH COMMUNITY COLLEGE$20,000
12 PLUS$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
BERGEN NEW BRIDGE MEDICAL CENTER$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $445k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FAMILY TOUCH INC: $20k → 7%FAMILY TOUCH INC: $20k → 7%FAMILY TOUCH INC: $10k → 7%FAMILY TOUCH INC: $10k → 7%FAMILY TOUCH INC: $5k → 7%FAMILY TOUCH INC: $5k → 7%FAMILY TOUCH INC: $5k → 7%FAMILY TOUCH INC: $5k → 7%FAMILY TOUCH INC: $5k → 7%ASIAN AMERICAN FEDERATION: $20k → 17%ASIAN AMERICAN FEDERATION: $20k → 17%ASIAN AMERICAN FEDERATION: $20k → 17%CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL: $5k → 17%BERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $10k → 7%BERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $10k → 7%BERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $10k → 7%KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES: $5k → 13%BERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $10k → 7%BERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $10k → 7%BERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $10k → 7%BERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $10k → 7%FLUSHING YMCA: $40k → 13%BERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $10k → 7%FLUSHING YMCA: $20k → 13%FLUSHING YMCA: $20k → 13%BERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $10k → 7%FLUSHING YMCA: $20k → 13%FLUSHING YMCA: $20k → 13%FLUSHING YMCA: $20k → 13%FLUSHING YMCA: $20k → 13%FLUSHING YMCA: $20k → 13%FLUSHING YMCA: $20k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 27 repeat orgs$157k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
4

Total granted

$2.5M
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+126%

Still filing today

37%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationEnvironmentPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW YORK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $200k · revenue +13%
  • 1P
    12 PLUS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $110k · revenue +232%
  • BF
    BERGEN FAMILY CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • K
    KACF
    one grant, 2023 · $43k
  • KC
    KINGSBOROUGH COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $14k
  • N
    NEWYORK-PRESBYTERIANQUEENSgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +54%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Congregational Community Services
Health
2
The Friends of Crown Heights Educational Centers Inc

To provide a safe, affordable and comprehensive program of high-quality early childhood education, parental and family support, as well as academic enrichment and recreational programs.

Human Services
3
The Graduate Center Foundation Inc

The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…

—
4
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
5
The New York Gracie Square Hospital Inc

Our mission is to provide the highest-quality, state-of-the-art mental health and chemical dependency treatment in a warm, healing environment. our caring, compassionate team prepares our patients to return to their families and…

Health
6
Children's Aid College Prep Charter School

Prepare elementary & middle school students for success in high school, college & life.

Education
7
Edith & Carl Marks Jewish Community House Bensonhurst Inc

The mission of the marks jch of bensonhurst, known as the jch, is to be a center for community life in brooklyn that is rooted in jewish values and fosters an inclusive environment. we affect residents at every life stage by providing…

Recreation & Sports
8
The Child Center of Ny Inc

The child center of ny strengthens children and families with skills, opportunities, and emotional support to build healthy, successful lives.

—
9
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
10
New York Institute of Technology

New york institute of technology (nyit) offers various degree programs, including undergraduate, graduate, and professional degrees, in more than 50 fields of study, including architecture and design; arts and sciences; (continued on…

Education
11
The New York and Presbyterian Hospital

To be a leader in the provision of world class patient care, teaching, research, and service to local, state, national, and international communities. newyork-presbyterian hospital is one of the nation's most comprehensive, integrated…

Health
12
Gotham Health Fqhc Inc

Gotham health fqhc, inc., operating together with new york city health and hospitals corporation under a public entity model federally qualified health center, provides you and your family with access to primary and preventative healthcare…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chinese-American Planning Council Inc; the most unlike its peers is Stella and Charles Guttman Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KAAGNY: $160,000 · OtherKAAGNYBERGEN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $150,000 · OtherBERGEN COMMUNITY COLLEGEBMCC: $140,000 · OtherBMCCLAGUARDIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $140,000 · OtherLAGUARDIA COMMUNITY COLLEGEUNION COUNTY COLLEGE: $140,000 · OtherUNION COUNTY COLLEGEQUEENSBOROUGH COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $140,000 · OtherQUEENSBOROUGH COMMUNITY COLLEGEMIDDLESEX COUNTY COLLEGE: $126,000 · OtherMIDDLESEX COUNTY COLLEGEHUDSON COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $106,000 · OtherHUDSON COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGECIDA: $95,000 · OtherCIDAKAFSC: $74,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $60,000 · OtherENGLEWOOD HEALTH FOUNDATION: $60,000 · Other+11 more: $341,500 · Other+11 moreYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW YORK: $200,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTI…BERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $90,000 · Human ServicesBERGEN FAMILY CENTE…FAMILY TOUCH INC: $85,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY TOUCH INCASIAN AMERICAN FEDERATION INC: $60,000 · Human ServicesASIAN AMERICAN FEDE…+2 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesKINGSBOROUGH COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $112,000 · Philanthropy12 PLUS: $110,000 · EducationHOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER INC: $60,000 · HealthST FRANCIS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 · HealthNEWYORK-PRESBYTERIANQUEENS: $5,000 · HealthGIVE CHANCES INC: $70,000 · InternationalNY NANUM FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Environment
Other$1,732,500Human Services$445,000Philanthropy$112,000Education$110,000Health$105,000International$70,000Environment$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW YORK: $200,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetKINGSBOROUGH COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $112,000 over 7y, 3.4% of budget12 PLUS: $110,000 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetBERGEN FAMILY CENTER: $90,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY TOUCH INC: $85,000 over 9y, 5.3% of budgetGIVE CHANCES INC: $70,000 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetHOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER INC: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN FEDERATION INC: $60,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetNY NANUM FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 3y, 9.2% of budgetST FRANCIS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNEWYORK-PRESBYTERIANQUEENS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METROPOLITAN NEW YORK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds KINGSBOROUGH COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds 12 PLUS ↗
  • Who funds BERGEN FAMILY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY TOUCH INC ↗
  • Who funds GIVE CHANCES INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLY NAME MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ASIAN AMERICAN FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NY NANUM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds STELLA AND CHARLES GUTTMAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NEWYORK-PRESBYTERIANQUEENS ↗
  • Who funds KOREAN COMMUNITY SERVICES OF METROPOLITAN NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds CHINESE-AMERICAN PLANNING COUNCIL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Korean-American Community Foundation IncNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Korean-American Community Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Southpole Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Southpole Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Bergen Family Center: 25% of income from government
  • Give Chances Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Holy Name Medical Center Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Southpole’s filings →

More from the funding graph