Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Southern California Center for Nonprofit Management

The SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CENTER FOR NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT (cnm) fosters thriving communities in southern california by equipping nonprofit leaders and groups with access to current best management and governance practices to expand their impact and reach.

$5.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
55
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2025.

Crime & Legal$4.0MHuman Services$565kCommunity Improvement$541kCivil Rights$424kHealth$339kYouth Development$296kInternational$150kEmployment$95kOther$0
02FY2025 · 55 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k25 grants · $608k
  • $50k–250k29 grants · $3.9M
  • $250k+1 grant · $750k
$88,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES$750,000
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF LOS ANGELES$238,000
GRANTS BELOW 5K$151,194
LOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER$150,000
NATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING NETWORK$150,000
LOS ANGELES MISSION INC$150,000
THAI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER$150,000
PILIPINO WORKERS CENTER OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$150,000
IMMIGRANT DEFENDERS LAW CENTER$150,000
PROGRAM FOR TORTURE VICTIMS$150,000
CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER - CARECEN$150,000
AFRICAN COMMUNITIES PUBLIC HEALTH COALITION$150,000
PUBLIC COUNSEL$150,000
WORKSITE WELLNESS LA$150,000
POMONA ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CENTER INC$150,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $2.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AL OTRO LADO: $75k → 11%FEED SACRAMENTO HOMELESS: $14k → 9%STREET SOCCER USA INC: $20k → 17%AL OTRO LADO: $45k → 11%STREET SOCCER USA INC: $19k → 17%AL OTRO LADO: $30k → 11%SF VALLEY REFUGEE CHILDREN CENTER INC: $45k → 14%GREATER SACRAMENTO URBAN LEAGUE: $25k → 12%SF VALLEY REFUGEE CHILDREN CENTER INC: $30k → 14%GREATER SACRAMENTO URBAN LEAGUE: $23k → 12%INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF LOS ANGELES: $238k → 14%KOREATOWN YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $150k → 14%SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $88k → 14%IMPACT SAC: $25k → 12%IMPACT SAC: $23k → 12%FEED SACRAMENTO HOMELESS: $15k → 12%REDA INC: $20k → 12%REDA INC: $19k → 12%VALLEY CARE COMMUNITY CONSORTIUM: $88k → 14%OLIVE SUPPORT SERVICES: $88k → 14%PROGRAM FOR TORTURE VICTIMS: $150k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES: $750k → 14%SAAHAS FOR CAUSE: $75k → 14%SAAHAS FOR CAUSE: $45k → 14%SAAHAS FOR CAUSE: $30k → 14%THAI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $150k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

28%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 25 repeat orgs$4.8M to everyone else

25 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
3

Total granted

$1.9M
$225k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+72%

Still filing today

92%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 12% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsHealthCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    LATINO AND LATINA ROUNTABLE OF THE SAN GABRIEL & POMONA VALLEYS
    3× · 2023–2025 · $150k · revenue +7%
  • CL
    Community Lawyers Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $150k · revenue +190% · 47% of their budget
  • AO
    AL OTRO LADO
    3× · 2023–2025 · $150k · revenue +95%

Funded once

  • ASIAN HEALTH SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue +25%
  • CC
    CIELO COMMUNITY FOR INNOVATION ENTREPRENEURSHIP LEADERSHIPgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue +72%
  • RC
    REFUGEE CHILDREN CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $75k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asian Law Caucus

The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…

Crime & Legal
2
Southern California Immigration Project

Southern California Immigration Project is a public interest nonprofit organization dedicated to providing pro bono legal services to survivors of human and civil rights violations.

International
3
California Center for Movement Legal Services

The California Center for Movement Legal Services (Movement Legal) provides legal services in the pursuit of improving the lives of California's traditionally underserved residents, carrying out legal work that fosters community led policy…

Crime & Legal
4
La Raza Centro Legal - San Francisco

La Raza Centro Legal San Francisco provides high quality, highly trusted, free legal services to low-income or immigrant clients in the San Francisco Bay Area.

—
5
Los Angeles Black Worker Center

The mission of the Los Angeles Black Worker Center is to increase access to quality jobs, reduce employment discrimination, and improve industries that employ black workers through action and unionization.

Employment
6
Legal Link

Legal Link removes legal barriers that prolong poverty by adding critically needed capacity to the legal ecosystem.

Crime & Legal
7
Community Legal Services in East Palo Alto Inc

To provide transformative legal services that enable diverse communities in East Palo Alto and beyond to achieve a secure and thriving future.

Crime & Legal
8
Centro Legal De La Raza

Centro Legal De La Raza is a comprehensive legal services agency protecting and advancing the rights of low-income immigrant communities throguh culturally competent bilingual legal representation, education, and advocacy.

Crime & Legal
9
Center for Human Rights and Constitutional Law Foundation

The center for human rights and constitutional law (chrcl) is a nonprofit organization that advances and protects the rights of immigrants and communities impacted by systems of oppression through training and support, advocacy, and impact…

Civil Rights
10
California Pan-Ethnic Health Network

To promote health equity by advocating for public policies and sufficient resources to address the health needs of communities of color.

Health
11
Instituto De Educacion Popular Del Sur De California

strengthening the leadership and workforce skills of Day Laborers and Domestic Workers. through 5 Day Labor Centers, Workers Health Program & Mujeres en Accion using Education & outreach empowerment tools

Unclassified
12
Social Justice Collaborative

Social justice collaborative is californias leading provider of compassionate full scope deportation defense legal services to low income non-citizens in northern and central california. we boldly provide post-convition relief to…

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southern California Center for Nonprofit Management and the most unlike its peers is Olive Support Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Community Servi…Family & Youth Mental Healt…Early Childhood Care CentersCommunity Health CentersEnvironmental Advocacy & Po…Performing Arts Organizatio…Regional Business AdvocacyAsian Cultural Heritage Org…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%0%<5yr16%25%5–10yr20%23%10–20yr17%29%20–35yr10%15%35–55yr13%8%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%0%<5yr16%16%5–10yr20%20%10–20yr17%27%20–35yr10%17%35–55yr13%20%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/57
the rest of the field
15%
9,056/58,676

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
52/52
Grantees still filing
20/52
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC — $750,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INCINTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF LOS ANGELES — $238,000 · Human ServicesINTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF LOS ANGELESSAAHAS FOR CAUSE — $150,000 · Human ServicesSAAHAS FOR CAUSEProgram for Torture Victims — $150,000 · Human ServicesProgram for Torture VictimsTHAI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $150,000 · Human ServicesTHAI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTERAL OTRO LADO — $150,000 · Human ServicesAL OTRO LADOKOREATOWN YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTER — $150,000 · Human ServicesKOREATOWN YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTERSOUTHEAST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $88,000 · Human ServicesOLIVE SUPPORT SERVICES — $88,000 · Human ServicesVALLEY CARE COMMUNITY CONSORTIUM INC — $88,000 · Human Services+6 more — $276,950 · Human Services+6 moreSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CENTER FOR NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT — $151,194 · Community ImprovementSOUTHERN CALIFO…Salva — $150,000 · Community ImprovementSalvaLATINO AND LATINA ROUNTABLE OF THE SAN GABRIEL & POMONA VALLEYS — $150,000 · Community ImprovementLATINO AND LATI…PILIPINO WORKERS CENTER OF SOUTHERN — $150,000 · Community ImprovementPILIPINO WORKER…COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TECHNOLOGIES CENTER — $88,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY DEVEL…ANTELOPE VALLEY PARTNERS FOR HEALTH — $88,000 · Community ImprovementANTELOPE VALLEY…CIELO COMMUNITY FOR INNOVATION ENTREPRENEURSHIP LEADERSHIP — $75,000 · Community ImprovementCIELO COMMUNITY…Project Optimism Inc — $47,750 · Community ImprovementLOS ANGELES CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE — $150,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES CENTER FOR LAW …CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER - CARECEN — $150,000 · OtherCENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE C…NHPI - NATIVE HAWAIIAN AND PACIFIC ISLANDER DATA POLICY LAB UCLA CHPR — $150,000 · OtherNHPI - NATIVE HAWAIIAN AND …LOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER — $150,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES LGBT CENTERSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PACIFIC ISLANDER COMMUNITY RESPONSE TEAM (SCPICRT) — $88,000 · OtherSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PACIFIC…PARS EQUALITY CENTER (V) — $75,891 · OtherREFUGEE CHILDREN CENTER — $75,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES MISSION INC — $150,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES MISSION INCHUMAN RIGHTS FIRST — $150,000 · OtherHUMAN RIGHTS FIRSTPOMONA ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY CENTER — $150,000 · OtherPOMONA ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY…+8 more — $345,200 · Other+8 moreKOREAN AMERICAN COALITION — $150,000 · Civil RightsKOREAN AMERI…Filipino Migrant Center — $150,000 · Civil RightsFilipino Mig…COALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS — $150,000 · Civil RightsCOALITION FO…NATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING NETWORK — $150,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL DAY…CENTER FOR EMPOWERED POLITICS EDUCATION FUND — $75,000 · Civil RightsCENTER FOR E…PARS EQUALITY CENTER — $75,000 · Civil RightsPARS EQUALIT…AFRICAN COM PUBLIC HEALTH COALITION — $150,000 · HealthAFRICAN C…WORKSITE WELLNESS LA — $150,000 · HealthWORKSITE …WALL-LAS MEMORIAS PROJECT — $88,000 · HealthWALL-LAS …ASIAN HEALTH SERVICES — $75,000 · HealthASIAN HEA…LOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY — $75,000 · HealthLOS ANGEL…PUBLIC COUNSEL — $150,000 · Crime & LegalCommunity Lawyers Inc — $150,000 · Crime & LegalImmigrant Defenders Law Center — $150,000 · Crime & LegalThree Sisters Gardens — $47,750 · Crime & LegalCOUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS CALIFORNIA — $150,000 · Arts & Culture
Human Services$2,278,950Community Improvement$899,944Other$1,634,091Civil Rights$750,000Health$538,000Crime & Legal$497,750Arts & Culture$150,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC — $750,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF LOS ANGELES — $238,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CENTER FOR NONPROFIT MANAGEMENT — $151,194 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetKOREAN AMERICAN COALITION — $150,000 over 3y, 9.7% of budgetPUBLIC COUNSEL — $150,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLOS ANGELES CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE — $150,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetFilipino Migrant Center — $150,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetSAAHAS FOR CAUSE — $150,000 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetTHAI COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $150,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetWORKSITE WELLNESS LA — $150,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetLATINO AND LATINA ROUNTABLE OF THE SAN GABRIEL & POMONA VALLEYS — $150,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetLOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER — $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Lawyers Inc — $150,000 over 3y, 47% of budgetAL OTRO LADO — $150,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetCOALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS — $150,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPILIPINO WORKERS CENTER OF SOUTHERN — $150,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetNATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING NETWORK — $150,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetKOREATOWN YOUTH AND COMMUNITY CENTER — $150,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetImmigrant Defenders Law Center — $150,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TECHNOLOGIES CENTER — $88,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetVALLEY CARE COMMUNITY CONSORTIUM INC — $88,000 over 1y, 60% of budgetANTELOPE VALLEY PARTNERS FOR HEALTH — $88,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCENTER FOR EMPOWERED POLITICS EDUCATION FUND — $75,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetASIAN HEALTH SERVICES — $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES ALLIANCE FOR A NEW ECONOMY — $75,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSAN FERNANDO VALLEY REFUGEE CHILDREN CENTER INC — $75,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetCIELO COMMUNITY FOR INNOVATION ENTREPRENEURSHIP LEADERSHIP — $75,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetProject Optimism Inc — $47,750 over 2y, 1.7% of budget916 INK — $47,750 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetSacramento Youth Center — $47,750 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetThree Sisters Gardens — $47,750 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetDEPARTMENT OF SOUND — $47,750 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetIMPACT SAC — $47,750 over 2y, 49% of budgetAMERICAN RIVER NATURAL HISTORY ASSOCIATION — $47,750 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetGREATER SACRAMENTO URBAN LEAGUE — $47,750 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetDaughters of Zion — $38,550 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetREFUGEES ENRICHMENT & DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION INC — $38,550 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetNATIONAL ACADEMIC YOUTH CORPS INC — $38,550 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetSTREET SOCCER USA INC — $38,550 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFEED SACRAMENTO HOMELESS — $29,350 over 2y, 9.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Weingart FoundationCalifornia Community …The California Endowm…The California Wellne…Community PartnersSierra Health Foundat…Liberty Hill Foundati…The Ralph M Parsons F…GofundmeorgSacramento Region Com…Public Health Institu…Kaiser Foundation Hos…
Weingart FoundationCA45.2× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Weingart Foundation · California Community Foundation · The California Endowment · The California Wellness Foundation · Community Partners · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · Liberty Hill Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Gofundmeorg · Sacramento Region Community Foundation · Public Health Institute · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Southern California Center for Nonprofit Management funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    29report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home