Skip to content
Sophie and Andrew Hlavach Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Sophie and Andrew Hlavach Charitable Trust

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Youth Development$51kHuman Services$15kHealth$7kPhilanthropy$7kAnimals$6kArts & Culture$4kEducation$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$1kOther$0
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ACADEMY OF THE HOLY NAMES$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HANDS ACROSS THE BAY: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

15%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14k · 5 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +156% since the first grant, against +43% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2022, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
17

Total granted

$14k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+156%
+43%

Still filing today

60%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Arts & CultureHealthRecreation & SportsAnimalsHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Humane Society of Tampa Bay Inc
    2× · 2019–2020 · $5k · revenue +156%
  • EG
    EMMI GRACE'S ANGELS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $4k
  • SP
    ST PETER CLAVER CATHOLIC SCHOOL
    2× · 2017–2018 · $3k

Funded once

  • TJ
    TAMPA JCCFEDERATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +34%
  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOME NETWORK
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • RR
    RICHARD'S RUN FOR LIFE
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tampa Women Stars Inc
Community Improvement
2
Tampa Bay Times Fund Inc
—
3
Tampabay-Job-Links Inc
—
4
Tampa Bay Performing Arts Center Inc

To inspire, educate and connect our community through the power of shared performing arts experiences.see schedule o for the organization's expanded mission.

—
5
Heart Gallery of Sarasota
—
6
Foundation for a Healthy St Petersburg Inc
Health
7
Tampa Bay Partnership Inc

The tampa bay partnership is a privately funded, ceo-driven regional advocacy organization, committed to creating a unified, competitive and prosperous tampa bay.

—
8
The Womens Care Florida Foundation
—
9
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
10
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Tampa Bay Florida Inc

Spca tampa bay is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that operates pinellas county's only nonprofit for-all animal shelter assisting all animals in need, regardless of species or circumstance, at its 10-acre campus in largo. (continued on…

Animals
11
Saint Peters Landmark Preservation Trust
—
12
BayCare Health System Inc

BAYCARE HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. (BCHS) WILL IMPROVE THE HEALTH OF ALL WE SERVE THROUGH COMMUNITY-OWNED HEALTH CARE SERVICES THAT SET THE STANDARD FOR HIGH-QUALITY, COMPASSIONATE CARE. BCHS is the best place to work, receive and provide care.…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Joseph's Hospital of Tampa Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Gonzmart Family Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ACADEMY OF THE HOLY NAMES: $50,000 · OtherACADEMY OF THE HOLY NAMESTHE CHILDREN'S HOME NETWORK: $5,000 · OtherTHE CHILDREN'S HOME NETWORKEMMI GRACE'S ANGELS FOUNDATION: $4,033 · OtherEMMI GRACE'S ANGELS FOUNDATIONST PETER CLAVER CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $2,559 · Other+10 more: $14,000 · Other+10 moreTAMPA JCCFEDERATION INC: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsHumane Society of Tampa Bay Inc: $4,500 · AnimalsST JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL OF TAMPA FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · HealthThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $1,000 · HealthGASPARILLA MUSIC FOUNDATION INC: $1,526 · Arts & CultureTAMPA MUSEUM OF ART INC: $100 · Arts & CultureJULIE WEINTRAUB'S HANDS ACROSS THE BAY INC: $1,600 · Human ServicesWARRICK DUNN CHARITIES INC: $1,500 · Housing & ShelterGONZMART FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · Philanthropy
Other$75,592Recreation & Sports$5,000Animals$4,500Health$2,500Arts & Culture$1,626Human Services$1,600Housing & Shelter$1,500Philanthropy$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTAMPA JCCFEDERATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHumane Society of Tampa Bay Inc: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJULIE WEINTRAUB'S HANDS ACROSS THE BAY INC: $1,600 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGASPARILLA MUSIC FOUNDATION INC: $1,526 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL OF TAMPA FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWARRICK DUNN CHARITIES INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGONZMART FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAMPLIGHTERS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTAMPA MUSEUM OF ART INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Debartolo Family Foun…Vinik Family Foundati…The Donna Joseph Char…Irving Joseph Charita…Community Foundation …Natl Christian Charit…Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Debartolo Family Foundation IncFL22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Debartolo Family Foundation Inc · Vinik Family Foundation · The Donna Joseph Charitable Trust · Irving Joseph Charitable Trust · Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sophie and Andrew Hlavach Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sophie and Andrew Hlavach Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Tampa Jccfederation Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Tampa Museum of Art Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sophie and Andrew Hlavach Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Sophie and Andrew Hlavach Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2023) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sophie and Andrew Hlavach’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home