Skip to content

· Private foundation

Some Serious Business

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$18kYouth Development$11kCommunity Improvement$3kPhilanthropy$2kSocial Science$1kHuman Services$564Religion$284Public Safety & Disaster$280Other$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,390
Median grant
3
States reached
$39k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,390
Individual grant recipient$234
Wegrowecoorg$53
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $103) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%TEWA WOMEN UNITED: $103 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OR
NJ
CA
CO
WV
AZ
NM
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 16% of Some Serious Business’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Some Serious Businesslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$19k · 10 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
35

Total granted

$19k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+17%

Still filing today

40%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureCivil RightsYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NY
    NORTHERN YOUTH PROJECT
    6× · 2017–2024 · $10k · revenue +60%
  • TO
    The Operating System Inc
    2× · 2020–2023 · $600 · revenue +28%
  • NM
    NEW MEXICO FUND FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS
    5× · 2017–2024 · $408 · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nm Committee of the National Museum of Women in the Arts

As part of the network of national chapters, the new mexico committee of the national museum of women in the arts enhances the mission of the national museum of women in the arts bringing recognition to the achievements of women artists by…

Philanthropy
2
Leadership New Mexico

Strengthening new mexico by educating and connecting diverse leaders through experiential learning programs and activities.

Arts & Culture
3
Community Power New Mexico
Community Improvement
4
New Mexico Out-of School Time Network

To cultivate enriching experiences for children and youth beyond the school day. vision: all children and youth in new mexico have access to high quality out-of-school time (ost) opportunities regardless of zip code and income. the new…

Education
5
New Mexico Humanities Council

The new mexico humanities council (nmhc) supports and conducts innovative and imaginative programs throughout the state that lead to a greater understanding of, and motivate interest in, the richness of our human experience and heritage.…

—
6
Bold Futures Nm

Bold futures nm leads policy change, research, place-based organizing, and culture shift by and for women and people of color in new mexico. bold futures nm centers the lived experiences and expertise of those most impacted by an issue,…

Human Services
7
New Mexico Acequia Association

To protect new mexico's water and acequias, grow healthy food for local families and communities, and to honor new mexico's cultural heritage.

Environment
8
Equal Access to Justice Inc

To increase access to justice by supporting and expanding free civil legal services for low-income new mexicans. for 35 years, equal access to justice has been providing unrestricted, noncompetitive funds to legal aid organizations who…

Philanthropy
9
New Mexico Community Capital

New mexico community capital's mission is to give rise to a more equitable future by providing culturally appropriate tools for success to emerging native american owned businesses, native families, and tribal enterprises. we provide…

Community Improvement
10
American Civil Liberties Union of New Mexico

Aclu-nm is the state affiliate of the aclu, the nation's premier civil rights and civil liberties organization. the purpose of aclu-nm is to protect and advance justice, liberty and equity as guaranteed by the constitutions of new mexico…

—
11
American Civil Liberties Union of New Mexico Foundation

Aclu of nm foundation is the state affiliate of alcu, the nation's premier civil rights and civil liberties organization. our purpose is to protect and advance justice, liberty, and equity.

—
12
Women Action & the Media Corp

Gender equity in media access, representation, employment and ownership and a world in which a just media is considered essential to a just society. women, action & the media (wam) connects and supports media makers, activists, academics…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Operating System Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $2,890 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $1,721 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $1,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTipping Point LLC: $1,500 · OtherTipping Point LLCIndividual grant recipient: $1,450 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSTREETS HERIONES LLC: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $1,000 · Other+26 more: $5,852 · Other+26 moreNORTHERN YOUTH PROJECT: $9,645 · Youth DevelopmentNORTHERN YOUTH PROJECTNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 · PhilanthropyCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION: $100 · PhilanthropyThe Operating System Inc: $600 · Arts & CulturePUEBLO DE ABIQUIU LIBRARY AND CULTURAL CENTER: $200 · Arts & CultureWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC: $150 · Arts & CultureTEWA WOMEN UNITED: $103 · Human ServicesNEW MEXICO VOICES FOR CHILDREN: $50 · Civil RightsSOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT: $25 · Civil RightsSOMOS UN PUEBLO UNIDO: $20 · Civil RightsDONORSCHOOSEORG: $80 · EducationALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $25 · Health
Other$23,913Youth Development$9,645Philanthropy$2,100Arts & Culture$950Human Services$103Civil Rights$95Education$80Health$25

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNORTHERN YOUTH PROJECT: $9,645 over 6y, 6.0% of budgetThe Operating System Inc: $600 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetNEW MEXICO FUND FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS: $408 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST NEW MEXICO ARTS COUNCIL: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPUEBLO DE ABIQUIU LIBRARY AND CULTURAL CENTER: $200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEWA WOMEN UNITED: $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $80 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW MEXICO VOICES FOR CHILDREN: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOMOS UN PUEBLO UNIDO: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTHERN YOUTH PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Operating System Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO FUND FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST NEW MEXICO ARTS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds PUEBLO DE ABIQUIU LIBRARY AND CULTURAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC ↗
  • Who funds TEWA WOMEN UNITED ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community FoundationNM21.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · New Mexico Community Foundation · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · WK Kellogg Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Common Counsel Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Tides Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Some Serious Business funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Some Serious Business. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Some Serious Business?

    Find your warmest path to Some Serious Business through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Some Serious Business’ filings →

    More from the funding graph