Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Some Serious Business

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$18kYouth Development$11kCommunity Improvement$3kPhilanthropy$2kSocial Science$1kHuman Services$564Religion$284Public Safety & Disaster$280Other$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,390
Median grant
3
States reached
$39k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,390
Individual grant recipient$234
Wegrowecoorg$53
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $103) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%TEWA WOMEN UNITED: $103 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OR
NJ
CA
CO
WV
AZ
NM

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 16% of Some Serious Business’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Some Serious Businesslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$19k · 10 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +60% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
35

Total granted

$19k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+17%

Still filing today

40%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureCivil RightsYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEducationHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NY
    NORTHERN YOUTH PROJECT
    6× · 2017–2024 · $10k · revenue +60%
  • TO
    The Operating System Inc
    2× · 2020–2023 · $600 · revenue +28%
  • NM
    NEW MEXICO FUND FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS
    5× · 2017–2024 · $408 · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nm Committee of the National Museum of Women in the Arts

As part of the network of national chapters, the new mexico committee of the national museum of women in the arts enhances the mission of the national museum of women in the arts bringing recognition to the achievements of women artists by…

Philanthropy
2
Leadership New Mexico

Strengthening new mexico by educating and connecting diverse leaders through experiential learning programs and activities.

Arts & Culture
3
Community Power New Mexico
Community Improvement
4
New Mexico Out-of School Time Network

To cultivate enriching experiences for children and youth beyond the school day. vision: all children and youth in new mexico have access to high quality out-of-school time (ost) opportunities regardless of zip code and income. the new…

Education
5
New Mexico Humanities Council

The new mexico humanities council (nmhc) supports and conducts innovative and imaginative programs throughout the state that lead to a greater understanding of, and motivate interest in, the richness of our human experience and heritage.…

6
Bold Futures Nm

Bold futures nm leads policy change, research, place-based organizing, and culture shift by and for women and people of color in new mexico. bold futures nm centers the lived experiences and expertise of those most impacted by an issue,…

Human Services
7
New Mexico Acequia Association

To protect new mexico's water and acequias, grow healthy food for local families and communities, and to honor new mexico's cultural heritage.

Environment
8
Equal Access to Justice Inc

To increase access to justice by supporting and expanding free civil legal services for low-income new mexicans. for 35 years, equal access to justice has been providing unrestricted, noncompetitive funds to legal aid organizations who…

Philanthropy
9
New Mexico Community Capital

New mexico community capital's mission is to give rise to a more equitable future by providing culturally appropriate tools for success to emerging native american owned businesses, native families, and tribal enterprises. we provide…

Community Improvement
10
American Civil Liberties Union of New Mexico

Aclu-nm is the state affiliate of the aclu, the nation's premier civil rights and civil liberties organization. the purpose of aclu-nm is to protect and advance justice, liberty and equity as guaranteed by the constitutions of new mexico…

11
American Civil Liberties Union of New Mexico Foundation

Aclu of nm foundation is the state affiliate of alcu, the nation's premier civil rights and civil liberties organization. our purpose is to protect and advance justice, liberty, and equity.

12
Women Action & the Media Corp

Gender equity in media access, representation, employment and ownership and a world in which a just media is considered essential to a just society. women, action & the media (wam) connects and supports media makers, activists, academics…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Operating System Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $2,890 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $2,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $1,721 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $1,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTipping Point LLC — $1,500 · OtherTipping Point LLCIndividual grant recipient — $1,450 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $1,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $1,000 · OtherSTREETS HERIONES LLC — $1,000 · Other+26 more — $5,852 · Other+26 moreNORTHERN YOUTH PROJECT — $9,645 · Youth DevelopmentNORTHERN YOUTH PROJECTNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,000 · PhilanthropyCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION — $100 · PhilanthropyThe Operating System Inc — $600 · Arts & CulturePUEBLO DE ABIQUIU LIBRARY AND CULTURAL CENTER — $200 · Arts & CultureWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC — $150 · Arts & CultureTEWA WOMEN UNITED — $103 · Human ServicesNEW MEXICO VOICES FOR CHILDREN — $50 · Civil RightsSOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT — $25 · Civil RightsSOMOS UN PUEBLO UNIDO — $20 · Civil RightsDONORSCHOOSEORG — $80 · EducationALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $25 · Health
Other$23,913Youth Development$9,645Philanthropy$2,100Arts & Culture$950Human Services$103Civil Rights$95Education$80Health$25

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNORTHERN YOUTH PROJECT — $9,645 over 6y, 6.0% of budgetThe Operating System Inc — $600 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetNEW MEXICO FUND FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS — $408 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST NEW MEXICO ARTS COUNCIL — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPUEBLO DE ABIQUIU LIBRARY AND CULTURAL CENTER — $200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC — $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEWA WOMEN UNITED — $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG — $80 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW MEXICO VOICES FOR CHILDREN — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOMOS UN PUEBLO UNIDO — $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NORTHERN YOUTH PROJECT
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds The Operating System Inc
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO FUND FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS
  • Who funds NORTHWEST NEW MEXICO ARTS COUNCIL
  • Who funds PUEBLO DE ABIQUIU LIBRARY AND CULTURAL CENTER
  • Who funds WOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC
  • Who funds TEWA WOMEN UNITED
  • Who funds COLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO VOICES FOR CHILDREN

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community FoundationNM21.8× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · New Mexico Community Foundation · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · WK Kellogg Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Common Counsel Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Tides Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Some Serious Business funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Some Serious Business?

    Find your warmest path to Some Serious Business through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph