Skip to content

· Private foundation

Solid Rock Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$350k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$5.4MHousing & Shelter$2.9MHuman Services$2.6MYouth Development$2.4MPhilanthropy$905kCivil Rights$500kHealth$200kFood & Nutrition$100k
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k15 grants · $2.7M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.2M
$200,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$63M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIVING CLASSROOMS FOUNDATION$350,000
MOTHER SETON ACADEMY$300,000
COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES$300,000
SEED SCHOOL OF MARYLAND$250,000
ST ANNS CENTER FOR CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILIES$200,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SAN FRANCISCO$200,000
MISSION DOLORES ACADEMY$200,000
SAN FRANCISCO CASA$200,000
DE MARILLAC ACADEMY$200,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY GREATER SAN FRANCISCO$200,000
CITY KIDS WILDERNESS PROJECT$200,000
SAMARITAN HOUSE$200,000
ST FRANCIS CENTER OF REDWOOD CITY$200,000
ST JAMES SCHOOL$200,000
LIFEMOVES$200,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $300k → 10%ST ANNS CENTER FOR CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILIES: $300k → 11%ST ANNS CENTER FOR CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILIES: $200k → 11%ST ANNS CENTER FOR CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILIES: $150k → 11%ST ANNS CENTER FOR CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILIES: $150k → 11%ST ANN'S CENTER FOR CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILIES: $100k → 11%ST ANN'S CENTER FOR CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILIES: $100k → 11%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $100k → 10%ST ANN'S CENTER FOR CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILIES: $100k → 11%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $100k → 10%ST ANN'S CENTER FOR CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILIES: $100k → 11%RAFAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $250k → 10%RAFAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $200k → 10%RAFAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO: $100k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$15M · 25 repeat orgs$100k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
1

Total granted

$15M
$100k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+118%

Still filing today

64%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyFood & NutritionCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    St Anns Center for Children Youth and Families
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +72%
  • SAMARITAN HOUSE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +249%
  • L
    LIFEMOVES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $950k · revenue +186%

Funded once

  • RE
    REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANKgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +118%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
2
Community Action Marin

We make it possible for people in marin to achieve well-being by providing the vital services they need. together, we break down the barriers that get in the way of fair and lasting change in service to better outcomes for all.

Human Services
3
Friends of the Children - San Francisco Bay Area

Impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors - 12+ years, no matter what.

Education
4
Children's Council of San Francisco

By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…

Human Services
5
Sacramento Children's Home

At the sacramento children's home, we are committed to opening doors to the future by maximizing the potential of children and families.

Human Services
6
Homeownership San Francisco dba Home Sf

The Organization is a citywide collaborative of housing counseling agencies that helps diverse and underserved households achieve and sustain homeownership in San Francisco.

—
7
Hamilton Families

Hamilton families' mission is to end family homelessness in the san francisco bay area.

Housing & Shelter
8
Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco Inc

The Housing Rights Committee of San Francisco is dedicated to combating the displacement crisis gripping our city by building the power of working-class tenants of color to take on the real estate industry and win housing justice for all.…

Education
9
Faces Sf

Our mission is to nurture, teach and empower children and families to transform their lives by providing critical assistance to low-income families with early childhood development, workforce training, school-age enrichment, and family…

Education
10
Larkin Street Youth Services

The mission of Larkin Street Youth Services is to create a continuum of services that inspires youth to move beyond the street. We will nurture potential, promote dignity, and support bold steps by all.

Human Services
11
San Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne
Recreation & Sports
12
Homeward Bound of Marin

Homeward Bound is the main provider of emergency shelter, supportive housing and services for people overcoming a crisis of homelessness in Marin County, California. Our mission of "opening doors to safety, dignity, hope, and…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Compass Family Services; the most unlike its peers is Start the Adventure in Reading (Stair) - Annapolis Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LIVING CLASSROOMS FOUNDATION: $1,525,000 · OtherLIVING CLASSROOMS FOUNDATIONSAMARITAN HOUSE: $1,075,000 · OtherSAMARITAN HOUSELIFEMOVES: $950,000 · OtherLIFEMOVESHABITAT FOR HUMANITY GREATER SAN FRANCISCO: $900,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY GREATER SAN FRANCISCOMOTHER SETON ACADEMY INC: $770,000 · OtherMOTHER SETON ACADEMY INCDE MARILLAC ACADEMY: $650,000 · OtherDE MARILLAC ACADEMYPENINSULA FAMILY YMCA: $600,000 · OtherPENINSULA FAMILY YMCAST JAMES SCHOOL: $550,000 · OtherST JAMES SCHOOLMOTHER SETON ACADEMY: $400,000 · OtherST FRANCIS CENTER OF REDWOOD CITY: $350,000 · OtherMISSION DOLORES ACADEMY: $350,000 · Other+3 more: $525,000 · Other+3 moreSt Anns Center for Children Youth and Families: $1,200,000 · Human ServicesSt Anns Center f…RAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $550,000 · Human ServicesRAPHAEL HOUSE OF…COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $500,000 · Human ServicesCOMPASS FAMILY S…THE SEED SCHOOL OF MARYLAND: $875,000 · EducationTHE SEED SCHO…READING PARTNERS: $525,000 · EducationREADING PARTN…Homework Central: $335,000 · EducationHomework Cent…+1 more: $30,000 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR STUDENTS RISING ABOVE: $905,000 · PhilanthropyBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO: $450,000 · Youth DevelopmentCity Kids to Wilderness Project Inc: $450,000 · Youth DevelopmentSan Francisco CASA: $500,000 · Civil RightsREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $100,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$8,645,000Human Services$2,250,000Education$1,765,000Philanthropy$905,000Youth Development$900,000Civil Rights$500,000Food & Nutrition$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSt Anns Center for Children Youth and Families: $1,200,000 over 8y, 6.8% of budgetSAMARITAN HOUSE: $1,075,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetLIFEMOVES: $950,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR STUDENTS RISING ABOVE: $905,000 over 8y, 4.5% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY GREATER SAN FRANCISCO: $900,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetTHE SEED SCHOOL OF MARYLAND: $875,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetRAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC: $550,000 over 3y, 7.4% of budgetREADING PARTNERS: $525,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCOMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $500,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetSan Francisco CASA: $500,000 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO: $450,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCity Kids to Wilderness Project Inc: $450,000 over 3y, 9.0% of budgetST FRANCIS CENTER OF REDWOOD CITY: $350,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetHomework Central: $335,000 over 6y, 29% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMID-PENINSULA BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $100,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds St Anns Center for Children Youth and Families ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds LIFEMOVES ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR STUDENTS RISING ABOVE ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY GREATER SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds THE SEED SCHOOL OF MARYLAND ↗
  • Who funds RAPHAEL HOUSE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC ↗
  • Who funds READING PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds San Francisco CASA ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds City Kids to Wilderness Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST FRANCIS CENTER OF REDWOOD CITY ↗
  • Who funds Homework Central ↗
  • Who funds REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds MID-PENINSULA BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds Start the Adventure in Reading (STAIR) - Annapolis Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA16.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · The San Francisco Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Atkinson Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · McNabb Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Marin Community Foundation · United Way Worldwide

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Solid Rock Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Solid Rock Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • St Anns Center for Children Youth and Families: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Solid Rock Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Solid Rock Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Solid Rock’s filings →

More from the funding graph