Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Society of Critical Care Medicine

To secure the highest quality care for all critically ill and injured patients.

$489k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$1.5MScience & Tech$938kEducation$265kHousing & Shelter$25kHuman Services$14kInternational$5kCommunity Improvement$5k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 6 grants below total $450,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $489,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $39,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$50,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$58M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLEVELAND MEDICAL CENTER$150,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO$50,000
EMORY UNIVERSITY$50,000
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA$50,000
RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 72% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%VALLEYWISE HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER: $7k → 11%RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL: $50k → 7%BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL: $20k → 16%MAYO CLINIC: $200k → 9%WELLSPAN YORK HOSPITAL: $10k → 9%GEISINGER MEDICAL CENTER: $5k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $50k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 16%THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $50k → 22%PROJECT HOMELESS CONNECT: $25k → 10%NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATION: $50k → 10%DIRECT RELIEF: $5k → 14%MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $17k → 17%UT SOUTHWESTERN MED CTR: $20k → 14%PRISMA HEALTH: $20k → 10%MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $50k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $100k → 14%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $50k → 11%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $100k → 10%MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN: $10k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $50k → 13%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $100k → 14%NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $5k → 12%REGENSTRIEF INSTITUTE: $5k → 16%THE METROHEALTH SYTEM: $30k → 17%ADVOCATE HEALTH CARE: $10k → 7%SPRINGFIELD CLINIC LLP: $5k → 11%SAINT FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER: $7k → 14%THE RECTOR AND VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $65k → 8%CONCORD HOSPITAL: $7k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY: $5k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF LOUSIVILLE: $10k → 15%BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL: $7k → 16%MAYO CLINIC: $50k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $5k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $50k → 10%UT SOUTHWESTERN MED CTR: $10k → 14%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $50k → 14%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $50k → 14%CLEVELAND MEDICAL CENTER: $150k → 17%ADVOCATE HEALTH CARE: $10k → 7%BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 16%MAYO CLINIC: $16k → 9%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $50k → 16%AMBIENT CLINICAL ANALYTICS: $51k → 9%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $48k → 16%AMBIENT CLINICAL ANALYTICS: $23k → 9%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $25k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
RI
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
AZ
NM
NC
SC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

31%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$775k · 7 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
40

Total granted

$775k
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+27%

Still filing today

43%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $350k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EU
    Emory University
    2× · 2023–2025 · $150k · revenue +16%
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2021–2023 · $123k · revenue +24%
  • AH
    ADVOCATE HEALTH CARE NETWORK
    2× · 2022–2023 · $20k · revenue ×14

Funded once

  • CH
    Children's Hospital Corporationgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +27%
  • VU
    VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +33%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
2
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
3
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
4
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
5
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health
6
Upmc Group

Healthcare, education, and research

—
7
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
8
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
9
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
10
Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group

Northwestern memorial healthcare is an integrated healthcare system, consisting of multiple hospitals (including northwestern memorial hospital, an academic medical center) and networks of physicians and healthcare professionals, where the…

Health
11
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
12
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital Medical Center and the most unlike its peers is Wake Forest University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Military Veterans SupportAffordable Housing Developm…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%46%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%10%20–35yr13%14%35–55yr16%51%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/51
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,514

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
28/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MAYO CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM — $227,906 · OtherMAYO CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEMUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS CLEVELAND MED CTR — $150,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS CLEVELAND MED CTRREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $150,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $122,711 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYVANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER — $100,000 · OtherVANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTERUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN — $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANAMBIENT CLINICAL ANALYTICS — $74,050 · OtherRECTOR & VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA — $65,000 · OtherPHI CHI MEDICAL FRATERNITY INC — $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO — $50,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO — $50,000 · OtherTEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY SYSTEM — $50,000 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY — $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL — $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO - HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER — $50,000 · Other+10 more — $133,482 · Other+10 moreMAYO CLINIC — $266,250 · HealthMAYO CLINICChildren's Hospital Corporation — $100,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital CorporationDUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $100,000 · HealthDUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM I…CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER — $100,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CEN…THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $50,000 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHIL…Rhode Island Hospital — $50,000 · HealthRhode Island HospitalNORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATION INC — $50,000 · HealthNORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE F…+8 more — $68,000 · Health+8 moreEmory University — $150,000 · EducationEmory UniversitySOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $100,000 · EducationSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL…UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $55,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSB…University of Miami — $50,000 · EducationUniversity of MiamiWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $50,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSIT…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $50,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIV…Prisma Health Medical Group-Midlands — $20,000 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $17,274 · Education+3 more — $20,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES — $25,000 · PhilanthropyDIRECT RELIEF — $5,118 · International
Other$1,473,149Health$784,250Education$512,274Philanthropy$25,000International$5,118

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMAYO CLINIC — $266,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University — $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $122,711 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $55,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADVOCATE HEALTH CARE NETWORK — $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetPrisma Health Medical Group-Midlands — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI — $17,274 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWELLSPAN HEALTH — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPrisma Health — $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetConcord Hospital Inc — $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF — $5,118 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEISINGER MEDICAL CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRegenstrief Institute Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION GROUP RETURN — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mayo ClinicAmerican Cancer Socie…Johns Hopkins Univers…Fidelity Investments …
Mayo ClinicMN15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mayo Clinic · American Cancer Society Inc · Johns Hopkins University · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Society of Critical Care Medicine funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
  • University of Miami — 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Society of Critical Care Medicine?

Find your warmest path to Society of Critical Care Medicine through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home