Skip to content

· Public charity

Society of Critical Care Medicine

To secure the highest quality care for all critically ill and injured patients.

$489k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$1.5MScience & Tech$938kEducation$265kHousing & Shelter$25kHuman Services$14kInternational$5kCommunity Improvement$5k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $450,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $489,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $39,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$50,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$58M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CLEVELAND MEDICAL CENTER$150,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$100,000
UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO$50,000
EMORY UNIVERSITY$50,000
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA$50,000
RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 72% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%VALLEYWISE HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER: $7k → 11%RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL: $50k → 7%BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL: $20k → 16%MAYO CLINIC: $200k → 9%WELLSPAN YORK HOSPITAL: $10k → 9%GEISINGER MEDICAL CENTER: $5k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $50k → 11%PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 16%THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $50k → 22%PROJECT HOMELESS CONNECT: $25k → 10%NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATION: $50k → 10%DIRECT RELIEF: $5k → 14%MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $17k → 17%UT SOUTHWESTERN MED CTR: $20k → 14%PRISMA HEALTH: $20k → 10%MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $50k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $100k → 14%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $50k → 11%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $100k → 10%MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN: $10k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA: $50k → 13%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $100k → 14%NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $5k → 12%REGENSTRIEF INSTITUTE: $5k → 16%THE METROHEALTH SYTEM: $30k → 17%ADVOCATE HEALTH CARE: $10k → 7%SPRINGFIELD CLINIC LLP: $5k → 11%SAINT FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER: $7k → 14%THE RECTOR AND VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $65k → 8%CONCORD HOSPITAL: $7k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY: $5k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF LOUSIVILLE: $10k → 15%BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL: $7k → 16%MAYO CLINIC: $50k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $5k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $50k → 10%UT SOUTHWESTERN MED CTR: $10k → 14%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $50k → 14%EMORY UNIVERSITY: $50k → 14%CLEVELAND MEDICAL CENTER: $150k → 17%ADVOCATE HEALTH CARE: $10k → 7%BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER: $10k → 16%MAYO CLINIC: $16k → 9%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $50k → 16%AMBIENT CLINICAL ANALYTICS: $51k → 9%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $48k → 16%AMBIENT CLINICAL ANALYTICS: $23k → 9%BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $25k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
RI
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
AZ
NM
NC
SC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

31%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$775k · 7 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
40

Total granted

$775k
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+36%

Still filing today

43%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $350k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EU
    Emory University
    2× · 2023–2025 · $150k · revenue +16%
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2021–2023 · $123k · revenue +24%
  • AH
    ADVOCATE HEALTH CARE NETWORK
    2× · 2022–2023 · $20k · revenue ×14

Funded once

  • CH
    Children's Hospital Corporationgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +44%
  • VU
    VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
2
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
3
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
4
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
5
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health
6
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
7
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
8
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
9
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
10
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
11
Northwestern Memorial HealthCare Group

Northwestern memorial healthcare is an integrated healthcare system, consisting of multiple hospitals (including northwestern memorial hospital, an academic medical center) and networks of physicians and healthcare professionals, where the…

Health
12
Upmc Group

Healthcare, education, and research

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boston Medical Center Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Wake Forest University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
27/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAYO CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM: $227,906 · OtherMAYO CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEMUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS CLEVELAND MED CTR: $150,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY HOSPITALS CLEVELAND MED CTRREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $150,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $122,711 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYVANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER: $100,000 · OtherVANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTERUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANAMBIENT CLINICAL ANALYTICS: $74,050 · OtherRECTOR & VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $65,000 · OtherPHI CHI MEDICAL FRATERNITY INC: $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $50,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $50,000 · OtherTEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY SYSTEM: $50,000 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL: $50,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO - HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER: $50,000 · Other+10 more: $133,482 · Other+10 moreMAYO CLINIC: $266,250 · HealthMAYO CLINICChildren's Hospital Corporation: $100,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital CorporationDUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $100,000 · HealthDUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM I…CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $100,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CEN…THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $50,000 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHIL…Rhode Island Hospital: $50,000 · HealthRhode Island HospitalNORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATION INC: $50,000 · HealthNORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE F…+8 more: $68,000 · Health+8 moreEmory University: $150,000 · EducationEmory UniversitySOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL…UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $55,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSB…University of Miami: $50,000 · EducationUniversity of MiamiWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $50,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSIT…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $50,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIV…Prisma Health Medical Group-Midlands: $20,000 · EducationICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $17,274 · Education+3 more: $20,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $25,000 · PhilanthropyDIRECT RELIEF: $5,118 · International
Other$1,473,149Health$784,250Education$512,274Philanthropy$25,000International$5,118

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMAYO CLINIC: $266,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University: $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $122,711 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $55,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRhode Island Hospital: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADVOCATE HEALTH CARE NETWORK: $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetPrisma Health Medical Group-Midlands: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $17,274 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWELLSPAN HEALTH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPrisma Health: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetConcord Hospital Inc: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $5,118 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEISINGER MEDICAL CENTER: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRegenstrief Institute Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION GROUP RETURN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mayo ClinicMN15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mayo Clinic · American Cancer Society Inc · Johns Hopkins University · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Society of Critical Care Medicine funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Society of Critical Care Medicine. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation: 23% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Society of Critical Care Medicine?

Find your warmest path to Society of Critical Care Medicine through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Society of Critical Care Medicine’s filings →

More from the funding graph