Skip to content
Snowmass Village Rotary Club Charitable Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Snowmass Village Rotary Club Charitable Foundation Inc

Community and international service.

$181k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$53kHealth$43kInternational$21kFood & Nutrition$18kYouth Development$15kReligion$10kHuman Services$10kEnvironment$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $28,950, the rows itemized in this filing. The $180,874 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $151,924 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$477k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SNOWMASS CHAPEL$7,950
CHRISTMAS WISH FOUNDATION$6,000
HOMECARE HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY$5,000
WINDWALKERS EQUINE ASSISTED LEARNING AND THERAPY CENTER$5,000
ASCENDIGO AUTISM SERVICES$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 16% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%HOMECARE HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY: $5k → 8%CHALLENGE ASPEN: $7k → 6%CHALLENGE ASPEN: $6k → 6%RESPONSE: $4k → 6%YOUTH ZONE: $4k → 6%MUSIC THERAPY OF THE ROCKIES: $2k → 6%WINDWALKERS EQUINE ASSISTED LEARNING AND THERAPY CENTER: $5k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

30%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$53k · 4 repeat orgs$120k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
29

Total granted

$53k
$102k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-39%
+56%

Still filing today

50%
34%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationEnvironmentInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CW
    CHRISTMAS WISH FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $18k · revenue -98%
  • CA
    CHALLENGE ASPEN
    2× · 2020–2023 · $13k · revenue +85%
  • AA
    ASCENDIGO AUTISM SERVICES INC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $13k · revenue -39%

Funded once

  • BH
    BASALT HIGH SCHOOL SCHOLARSHIP
    one grant, 2020 · $21k
  • VO
    VARIOUS OTHER DOMESTIC CHARITY
    one grant, 2020 · $13k
  • BC
    BORJAN CHILDRENS FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Aspen Effect Inc

Create youth interactions that strengthen resilience and leadership and help prevent mental health crisis.

Human Services
2
Colorado Discover Ability

Provide adaptive sports for the disabled.

Recreation & Sports
3
Yampa Valley Autism Program

YVAP helps neurodivergent youth aged 3-21 by providing individual therapy, social skills integration, community partnerships, education support, workplace readiness, community education, and family resources.

Human Services
4
Breckenridge Outdoor Education Center

To expand the potential of people with disabilities and special needs through meaningful, education and inspiring outdoor experiences.

Recreation & Sports
5
Alpine Autism Center

To provide access to effective treatment for individuals and families affected by autism in the pikes peak region, enabling those affected by autism to reach their full potential.

—
6
Wrap Around Wyoming Inc

Focus on individual and family identified priorities and strengths and success. collaborate by including community partner supports and resources families choose themselves so people can thrive. support people where they are. empower them…

—
7
Adaptive Sports Center of Crested Butte Inc

The adaptive sports center enriches the lives of people with disabilities and other specific needs through exceptional outdoor adventures. the successful programs the asc provides are inclusive to families and friends, empower our…

—
8
Aspen Compassion Adventures Inc
—
9
Arc of the Central Mountains

The arc of the central mountains promotes and protects the human rights of people in the community with the intellectual and developmental disabilities through advocacy and support services to become valued, contributing members of their…

Arts & Culture
10
Advocates for Recovery Colorado

Recovery from addiction is a process of gaining sobriety and contributing to one's family and community as a healthy productive person. AFRC provides peer coach mentoring to individuals in recovery from substance use disorders.

Human Services
11
Rocky Mountain Children's Law Center

To advocate for children and youth, drive systemic reeform, and boldly challenge the status quo so every young person who has experienced trauma or instability has the opportunity to thrive.

Crime & Legal
12
Camp Horseability Inc

Therapeutic horseback riding programs for individuals with physical, mental and/or emotional needs.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aspen Youth Center; the most unlike its peers is Christmas Wish Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BASALT HIGH SCHOOL SCHOLARSHIP: $21,000 · OtherBASALT HIGH SCHOOL SCHOLARSHIPCHRISTMAS WISH FOUNDATION: $17,500 · OtherCHRISTMAS WISH FOUNDATIONVARIOUS OTHER DOMESTIC CHARITY: $13,000 · OtherVARIOUS OTHER DOMESTIC CHARITYBASALT MIDDLE SCHOOL: $9,500 · OtherBASALT MIDDLE SCHOOLSNOWMASS CHAPEL: $7,950 · OtherSNOWMASS CHAPELBORJAN CHILDRENS FUND: $6,000 · OtherLITTLE RED SCHOOLHOUSE: $5,000 · OtherCHRISTMAS WISH FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Other+15 more: $30,960 · Other+15 moreCHALLENGE ASPEN: $13,000 · Human ServicesCHALLENGE ASPENHOSPICE OF THE VALLEY INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF THE VALLEY…WINDWALKERS EQUINE ASSISTED LEARNING AND: $5,000 · Human ServicesWINDWALKERS EQUINE AS…YOUTHZONE INC: $3,500 · Human ServicesYOUTHZONE INCResponse - Help for Survivors of Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault: $3,500 · Human ServicesResponse - Help for S…Music Therapy of the Rockies: $2,000 · Human ServicesMusic Therapy of the …ASCENDIGO AUTISM SERVICES INC: $12,500 · HealthASCENDIGO…ASPEN HOPE CENTER: $1,000 · HealthASPEN HOP…HEADQUARTERS: $1,000 · HealthHEADQUART…Ukrainian Action: $5,000 · InternationalASPEN YOUTH CENTER: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTHENTITY: $1,500 · EducationROARING FORK CONSERVANCY: $1,000 · Environment
Other$115,910Human Services$32,000Health$14,500International$5,000Youth Development$2,500Education$1,500Environment$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHALLENGE ASPEN: $13,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetASCENDIGO AUTISM SERVICES INC: $12,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWINDWALKERS EQUINE ASSISTED LEARNING AND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetUkrainian Action: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetResponse - Help for Survivors of Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault: $3,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetASPEN YOUTH CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMusic Therapy of the Rockies: $2,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetYOUTHENTITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BUDDY PROGRAM INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASPEN HOPE CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROARING FORK CONSERVANCY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHRISTMAS WISH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHALLENGE ASPEN ↗
  • Who funds ASCENDIGO AUTISM SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds WINDWALKERS EQUINE ASSISTED LEARNING AND ↗
  • Who funds Ukrainian Action ↗
  • Who funds YOUTHZONE INC ↗
  • Who funds Response - Help for Survivors of Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN YOUTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Music Therapy of the Rockies ↗
  • Who funds YOUTHENTITY ↗
  • Who funds THE BUDDY PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN HOPE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HEADQUARTERS ↗
  • Who funds ROARING FORK CONSERVANCY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Aspen Community Found…Colorado Gives Founda…El Pomar FoundationThe Thrift ShopRocky Mountain Health…Mile High United Way …Arches FoundationErnst and Wilma Marte…Aspen Business Center…Butler Family Foundat…Anschutz Family Found…National Philanthropi…
Aspen Community FoundationCO28.1× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Aspen Community Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · The Thrift Shop · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Arches Foundation · Ernst and Wilma Martens Foundation · Aspen Business Center Foundation · Butler Family Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Snowmass Village Rotary Club Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Snowmass Village Rotary Club Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Snowmass Village Rotary Club Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Snowmass Village Rotary Club Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Snowmass Village Rotary Club’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home