· Public charity
Snowmass Village Rotary Club Charitable Foundation Inc
Community and international service.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 67% of SNOWMASS VILLAGE ROTARY CLUB CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $28,950 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $180,874 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $151,924 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SNOWMASS CHAPEL | $7,950 |
| CHRISTMAS WISH FOUNDATION | $6,000 |
| ASCENDIGO AUTISM SERVICES | $5,000 |
| WINDWALKERS EQUINE ASSISTED LEARNING AND THERAPY CENTER | $5,000 |
| HOMECARE HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 16% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
4 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CWCHRISTMAS WISH FOUNDATION3× · 2023–2025 · $18k · revenue -98%
- CACHALLENGE ASPEN2× · 2020–2023 · $13k · revenue +85%
- AAASCENDIGO AUTISM SERVICES INC3× · 2020–2025 · $13k · revenue -39%
Funded once
- BHBASALT HIGH SCHOOL SCHOLARSHIPone grant, 2020 · $21k
- VOVARIOUS OTHER DOMESTIC CHARITYone grant, 2020 · $13k
- BCBORJAN CHILDRENS FUNDone grant, 2020 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Create youth interactions that strengthen resilience and leadership and help prevent mental health crisis.
Provide adaptive sports for the disabled.
YVAP helps neurodivergent youth aged 3-21 by providing individual therapy, social skills integration, community partnerships, education support, workplace readiness, community education, and family resources.
To expand the potential of people with disabilities and special needs through meaningful, education and inspiring outdoor experiences.
To provide access to effective treatment for individuals and families affected by autism in the pikes peak region, enabling those affected by autism to reach their full potential.
Focus on individual and family identified priorities and strengths and success. collaborate by including community partner supports and resources families choose themselves so people can thrive. support people where they are. empower them…
The adaptive sports center enriches the lives of people with disabilities and other specific needs through exceptional outdoor adventures. the successful programs the asc provides are inclusive to families and friends, empower our…
The arc of the central mountains promotes and protects the human rights of people in the community with the intellectual and developmental disabilities through advocacy and support services to become valued, contributing members of their…
Recovery from addiction is a process of gaining sobriety and contributing to one's family and community as a healthy productive person. AFRC provides peer coach mentoring to individuals in recovery from substance use disorders.
To advocate for children and youth, drive systemic reeform, and boldly challenge the status quo so every young person who has experienced trauma or instability has the opportunity to thrive.
Therapeutic horseback riding programs for individuals with physical, mental and/or emotional needs.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aspen Youth Center and the most unlike its peers is Christmas Wish Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHRISTMAS WISH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHALLENGE ASPEN ↗
- Who funds ASCENDIGO AUTISM SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds WINDWALKERS EQUINE ASSISTED LEARNING AND ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY INC ↗
- Who funds Ukrainian Action ↗
- Who funds Response - Help for Survivors of Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault ↗
- Who funds YOUTHZONE INC ↗
- Who funds ASPEN YOUTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds Music Therapy of the Rockies ↗
- Who funds YOUTHENTITY ↗
- Who funds THE BUDDY PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds HEADQUARTERS ↗
- Who funds ASPEN HOPE CENTER ↗
- Who funds ROARING FORK CONSERVANCY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Aspen Community Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · The Thrift Shop · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Arches Foundation · Ernst and Wilma Martens Foundation · Aspen Business Center Foundation · Butler Family Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Snowmass Village Rotary Club Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Snowmass Village Rotary Club Charitable Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Snowmass Village Rotary Club Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.