Skip to content
Siquentis Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Siquentis Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.4M
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$1.3MReligion$1.2MHuman Services$697kHousing & Shelter$577kEducation$309kHealth$305kArts & Culture$278kFood & Nutrition$165kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $310k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$15,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL$1,000,000
BLUEPRINT MINISTRIES$100,000
CHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE MINISTRY$40,000
PRAIRIE VIEW A&M UNIVERSITY$35,000
EDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION$30,000
SAMMINISTRIES$30,000
TEXAS STATE UNIVERSTIY MCCOY BUSINESS FND$25,000
ALPHA HOME$25,000
KERRVILLE FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$25,000
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$25,000
FOCUS ON THE FAMILY$25,000
SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK$15,000
HAVEN FOR HOPE$15,000
LIVING ON THE EDGE$10,000
SAN ANTONIO RESCUE MISSION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $429k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NEW DAY ORPHANAGE: $25k → 10%NEW DAY ORPHANAGE: $25k → 10%NEW DAY ORPHANAGE: $25k → 10%CHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE MINISTRY: $59k → 16%CHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE MINISTRY: $50k → 16%CHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE MINISTRY: $50k → 16%CHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE MINISTRY: $40k → 16%CHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE MINISTRY: $40k → 16%CHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE MINISTRY: $40k → 16%CHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE MINISTRY: $25k → 16%CHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE MINISTRY: $25k → 16%CHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE MINISTRY: $25k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
OR
CO
NE
AZ
TN
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.8M · 41 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

41 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
21

Total granted

$4.8M
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+28%

Still filing today

63%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterEducationInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Compassion International Incorporated
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +7%
  • BM
    BLUEPRINT MINISTRIES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $477k · revenue +119%
  • CA
    Christian Assistance Ministry
    9× · 2017–2025 · $354k · revenue +170%

Funded once

  • TS
    TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • KP
    KREATIVE PROJECT DBA LAVISH
    one grant, 2018 · $8k
  • P
    PIONEERS
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
SAMMinistries Social Enterprises

Provides a retail outlet to sell new, donated and gently used furniture and accessories. Proceeds are used to support the programs and operations of SAMMinistries.

—
2
Ariel Ministries

Ariel ministries exists to bring the good news of the messiah to jewish people and to disciple believers through intensive bible teaching from a messianic jewish perspective and dispensational theological position. continued on schedule o

Religion
3
The King's University

The King's University integrates Biblical education and practical ministry to shape Spirit-formed individuals who follow Jesus, serve His Church, and are sent to impact the world.

Education
4
San Antonio Automobile Dealers Association Foundation Inc
—
5
The King's University

The King's University integrates Biblical education and practical ministry to shape Spirit-formed individuals who follow Jesus, serve His Church, and are sent to impact the world.

Education
6
El Buen Samaritano Episcopal Mission

El Buen Samaritano an outreach ministry of the Episcopal Diocese of Texas serving the Latino community of Central Texas is committed to recognizing the dignity of all by ensuring access to health care education and essential needs that…

—
7
Los Angeles Mission Inc

The los angeles mission breaks the cycle of homelessness and poverty, by stabilizing people in a safe and spiritual environment, connecting them to solutions and walking with them on their journey.

Housing & Shelter
8
San Antonio Area Foundation

To serve as your most trusted and impactful philanthropic partner.

Philanthropy
9
San Antonio Medical Foundation

The mission of the san antonio medical foundation is to improvehealth care, advance biomedical science, and enhance communitywell-being by providing leadership & active stewardship of our landand other assets.

Health
10
San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts

The mission of the San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts shall be to establish and maintain a museum in order to house and exhibit a permanent collection of art as well as to provide space for traveling exhibitions, for the purpose of the…

Arts & Culture
11
First Baptist Denton Ministry Center

The mission of First Refuge Ministries is to share the Gospel of Jesus Christ by offering essential services to those in need within our community. Our belief is that every person has worth and value since they are created by God. Our goal…

Health
12
University of the Incarnate Word

The university is committed to educational excellence in a context of faith in jesus christ, the incarnate word of god. thus, through a liberal education, the university cultivates the development of the whole person and values of…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Haven for Hope of Bexar County; the most unlike its peers is Divide Volunteer Fire Department. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/42
Grantees still filing
32/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FOCUS ON THE FAMILY: $321,000 · OtherFOCUS ON THE FAMILYALPHA HOME INC: $286,600 · OtherALPHA HOME INCSAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $285,500 · OtherSAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INCPARK COMMUNITY CHURCH: $278,100 · OtherPARK COMMUNITY CHURCHPRAIRIE VIEW A&M UNIVERSITY: $165,300 · OtherPRAIRIE VIEW A&M UNIVERSITYSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $165,000 · OtherSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANKKLOVE: $154,500 · OtherKLOVEBAPTIST GENERAL CONVENTION OF TEXAS: $144,260 · OtherBAPTIST GENERAL CONVENTION OF TEXASSan Antonio Rescue Mission: $81,525 · Other+36 more: $425,963 · Other+36 moreCompassion International Incorporated: $1,180,000 · InternationalCompassion International In…+1 more: $200 · InternationalBLUEPRINT MINISTRIES INC: $477,000 · Youth DevelopmentBLUEPRINT M…YOUNG LIFE: $19,500 · Youth DevelopmentChristian Assistance Ministry: $354,200 · Human ServicesChristian …NEW DAY ORPHANAGE: $75,000 · Human ServicesNEW DAY OR…Haven for Hope of Bexar County: $210,187 · Housing & ShelterEDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION: $60,000 · Arts & CultureSAN ANTONIO MUSEUM OF ART: $23,750 · Arts & CultureALAMO PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL DOING BUSINESS AS KLRN: $22,500 · Arts & CultureThe Museum of Western Art: $4,500 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $4,500 · Arts & CultureLiving on the Edge Ministries Inc: $75,000 · ReligionFOR HER: $21,000 · ReligionINSIGHT FOR LIVING: $14,000 · Religion+4 more: $4,750 · Religion
Other$2,307,748International$1,180,200Youth Development$496,500Human Services$429,200Housing & Shelter$210,187Arts & Culture$115,250Religion$114,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCompassion International Incorporated: $1,180,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBLUEPRINT MINISTRIES INC: $477,000 over 9y, 12% of budgetChristian Assistance Ministry: $354,200 over 9y, 5.0% of budgetALPHA HOME INC: $286,600 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetSAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $285,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetHaven for Hope of Bexar County: $210,187 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $165,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSan Antonio Rescue Mission: $81,525 over 9y, 6.9% of budgetLiving on the Edge Ministries Inc: $75,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetNEW DAY ORPHANAGE: $75,000 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetEDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOregon State University Foundation: $51,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO MUSEUM OF ART: $23,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetALAMO PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL DOING BUSINESS AS KLRN: $22,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFOR HER: $21,000 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $19,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNTAIN HOME VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $17,000 over 8y, 3.0% of budgetSOUTHERN REINS CENTER FOR EQUINE THERAPY: $17,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetMorgan's Wonderland: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetINSIGHT FOR LIVING: $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNOMI NETWORK INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAGORA MINISTRIES INC: $9,900 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetAID THE SILENT: $7,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetThe Museum of Western Art: $4,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetOFB MINISTRIES INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSAN ANTONIO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLeakey Volunteer Fire Department Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetVanderpool Volunteer Fire Department: $2,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetSan Antonio Report: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINGRAM VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetDIETERT CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIVIDE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $1,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetQUARRY KINGDOM DEVELOPMENT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetImpact Retreat Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBULGARIAN CHILD INC: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMACARTHUR HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB: $107 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE FREDERICKSBURG NATURE CENTER: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds BLUEPRINT MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Christian Assistance Ministry ↗
  • Who funds ALPHA HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Haven for Hope of Bexar County ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds San Antonio Rescue Mission ↗
  • Who funds Living on the Edge Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW DAY ORPHANAGE ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Oregon State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds ALAMO PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL DOING BUSINESS AS KLRN ↗
  • Who funds FOR HER ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN HOME VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN REINS CENTER FOR EQUINE THERAPY ↗
  • Who funds Morgan's Wonderland ↗
  • Who funds INSIGHT FOR LIVING ↗
  • Who funds NOMI NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds AGORA MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds AID THE SILENT ↗
  • Who funds The Museum of Western Art ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Antonio Area Foun…Nancy Smith Hurd Foun…Harvey E Najim Charit…Charitable Foundation…Pryor Myra Stafford C…Hal & Charlie Peterso…The Community Foundat…Jack and Doris Smothe…H E Butt FoundationMarcia & Otto Koehler…The Charity Ball Asso…Perry & Ruby Stevens …
San Antonio Area FoundationTX24.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · Charitable Foundation Frost F0359600 · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · Hal & Charlie Peterson Foundation & Fd Mgmt Trust · The Community Foundation of the Texas Hill Country Inc · Jack and Doris Smothers and Bud Smothers Memorial Foundation · H E Butt Foundation · Marcia & Otto Koehler Foundation · The Charity Ball Association of San Antonio Inc · Perry & Ruby Stevens Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Siquentis Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Siquentis Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Oregon State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Siquentis’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home