· Private foundation
Siquentis Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k9 grants · $19k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $310k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL | $1,000,000 |
| BLUEPRINT MINISTRIES | $100,000 |
| CHRISTIAN ASSISTANCE MINISTRY | $40,000 |
| PRAIRIE VIEW A&M UNIVERSITY | $35,000 |
| SAMMINISTRIES | $30,000 |
| EDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| TEXAS STATE UNIVERSTIY MCCOY BUSINESS FND | $25,000 |
| ALPHA HOME | $25,000 |
| KERRVILLE FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH | $25,000 |
| OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| FOCUS ON THE FAMILY | $25,000 |
| HAVEN FOR HOPE | $15,000 |
| SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK | $15,000 |
| SAN ANTONIO RESCUE MISSION | $10,000 |
| LIVING ON THE EDGE | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $429k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
41 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Compassion International Incorporated8× · 2018–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +7%- BMBLUEPRINT MINISTRIES INC9× · 2017–2025 · $477k · revenue +119%
- CAChristian Assistance Ministry9× · 2017–2025 · $354k · revenue +170%
Funded once
- TSTEXAS STATE UNIVERSITYone grant, 2017 · $20k
- KPKREATIVE PROJECT DBA LAVISHone grant, 2018 · $8k
- PPIONEERSone grant, 2018 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provides a retail outlet to sell new, donated and gently used furniture and accessories. Proceeds are used to support the programs and operations of SAMMinistries.
Ariel ministries exists to bring the good news of the messiah to jewish people and to disciple believers through intensive bible teaching from a messianic jewish perspective and dispensational theological position. continued on schedule o
The King's University integrates Biblical education and practical ministry to shape Spirit-formed individuals who follow Jesus, serve His Church, and are sent to impact the world.
The King's University integrates Biblical education and practical ministry to shape Spirit-formed individuals who follow Jesus, serve His Church, and are sent to impact the world.
El Buen Samaritano an outreach ministry of the Episcopal Diocese of Texas serving the Latino community of Central Texas is committed to recognizing the dignity of all by ensuring access to health care education and essential needs that…
The los angeles mission breaks the cycle of homelessness and poverty, by stabilizing people in a safe and spiritual environment, connecting them to solutions and walking with them on their journey.
To serve as your most trusted and impactful philanthropic partner.
The mission of the san antonio medical foundation is to improvehealth care, advance biomedical science, and enhance communitywell-being by providing leadership & active stewardship of our landand other assets.
The mission of the San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts shall be to establish and maintain a museum in order to house and exhibit a permanent collection of art as well as to provide space for traveling exhibitions, for the purpose of the…
The mission of First Refuge Ministries is to share the Gospel of Jesus Christ by offering essential services to those in need within our community. Our belief is that every person has worth and value since they are created by God. Our goal…
The university is committed to educational excellence in a context of faith in jesus christ, the incarnate word of god. thus, through a liberal education, the university cultivates the development of the whole person and values of…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Haven for Hope of Bexar County and the most unlike its peers is Divide Volunteer Fire Department. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
- Who funds BLUEPRINT MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Christian Assistance Ministry ↗
- Who funds ALPHA HOME INC ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Haven for Hope of Bexar County ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds San Antonio Rescue Mission ↗
- Who funds NEW DAY ORPHANAGE ↗
- Who funds Living on the Edge Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds EDUCATIONAL MEDIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Oregon State University Foundation ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds ALAMO PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL DOING BUSINESS AS KLRN ↗
- Who funds FOR HER ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN HOME VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN REINS CENTER FOR EQUINE THERAPY ↗
- Who funds Morgan's Wonderland ↗
- Who funds INSIGHT FOR LIVING ↗
- Who funds NOMI NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds AGORA MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds AID THE SILENT ↗
- Who funds The Museum of Western Art ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · Charitable Foundation Frost F0359600 · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · Hal & Charlie Peterson Foundation & Fd Mgmt Trust · The Community Foundation of the Texas Hill Country Inc · Jack and Doris Smothers and Bud Smothers Memorial Foundation · H E Butt Foundation · Marcia & Otto Koehler Foundation · The Charity Ball Association of San Antonio Inc · Perry & Ruby Stevens Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Siquentis Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oregon State University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.