Skip to content
Silvio and Sally J Ingui Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Silvio and Sally J Ingui Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$343k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

International$467kAnimals$211kHealth$65kFood & Nutrition$42kEnvironment$26kPhilanthropy$25kHousing & Shelter$12kEducation$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k18 grants · $83k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
$6,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$5.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JOURNEY HOUSE ACTION RWANDA$150,000
RAMAPO BERGEN ANIMAL REFUGE INC (RBARI)$50,000
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS$10,000
ST MARY'S FOOD BANK$10,000
CENTER FOR HOPE (HAITI) INC$10,000
HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS$10,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$10,000
ARIZONA HUMANE SOCIETY$10,000
FEED THE CHILDREN$9,500
SPASTIC PARAPLEGIA FOUNDATION$8,000
SEATTLE FOUNDATION$7,500
ST JUDE'S CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL$6,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN$6,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 12% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CENTER FOR HOPE (HAITI) INC: $10k → 9%THREE ANGELS CHILDREN RELIEF: $5k → 14%CENTER FOR HOPE (HAITI) INC: $7k → 9%CENTER FOR HOPE (HAITI) INC: $7k → 9%CENTER FOR HOPE (HAITI) INC: $5k → 9%CENTER FOR HOPE (HAITI) INC: $4k → 9%CENTER FOR HOPE (HAITI) INC: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
WI
NY
PA
NJ
CT
CA
AZ
KS
TN
DC
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$833k · 24 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
1

Total granted

$833k
$500

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+771%

Still filing today

88%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsInternationalHealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JOURNEY HOUSE ACTIONS RWANDA INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $417k · revenue +193%
  • CO
    CENTER OF HOPE HAITI INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $35k · revenue +6%
  • SP
    SPASTIC PARAPLEGIA FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $33k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF CENTRAL & NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $500 · revenue +771%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
2
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
3
Hope for China Dogs Rescue

At Hope for China Dogs, we are committed to combating the cruel and inhumane practice of the dog meat trade in China. We believe that every dog deserves to live a life free from pain and suffering, and we are dedicated to rescuing and…

Animals
4
World Vets

To improve the health & well-being of animals through veterinary aid, response, training, research & local capacity building worldwide. We provide services to companion animals, horses, street dogs, livestock and marine animals including…

Animals
5
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
6
Tri County Humane Society

Tri-county animal rescue is a no-kill, nonprofit animal shelter working to prevent the killing of over 573,000 unwanted pets in broward, miami-dade, and palm beach counties. tri-county has no boundaries; we go all over the u.s. whenever we…

Animals
7
Best Friends Animal Society

To bring about a time when there are no more homeless pets. we do this by demonstrating and promoting exemplary animal care and building community programs and partnerships.

Animals
8
The Humane League

We exist to end the abuse of animals raised for food. this mission is executed by persuading companies and institutions to adopt animal welfare policies through negotiation and pressure campaigns, and then holding them accountable to their…

Animals
9
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
10
Animal Humane Society

Animal Humane Society (AHS) established in 1878 and incorporated as a nonprofit charitable organization in 1891 works to engage the hearts, hands, and minds of the community to help animals. AHS's vision is to compassionately and…

Animals
11
Animal Rescue Fund of the Hamptons Inc

THE ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS ACTIVELY RESCUES CATS AND DOGS, PROVIDES QUALITY CARE AND OFFERS SANCTUARY UNTIL LOVING HOMES CAN BE FOUND. ARF's work with animals, within our community and throughout the organization is guided by…

Animals
12
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Arizona Humane Society; the most unlike its peers is Wayne Township Memorial First Aid Squad Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
15/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN FRIENDS OF JOURNEY HOUSE ACTIONS RWANDA INC: $416,500 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF JOURNEY HOUSE ACTIONS RWANDA INC+3 more: $22,500 · InternationalRAMAPO-BERGEN ANIMAL REFUGE INC: $102,000 · AnimalsRAMAPO-BERGEN ANIMAL REFUG…THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $30,500 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR T…Humane World for Animals Inc: $30,350 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals I…Arizona Humane Society: $15,000 · AnimalsArizona Humane SocietyFOOTHILLS ANIMAL RESCUE: $12,000 · AnimalsFOOTHILLS ANIMAL RESCUEPAWS OF WAR INC: $9,000 · Animals+2 more: $7,000 · AnimalsSPASTIC PARAPLEGIA FOUNDATION INC: $32,500 · HealthHONORHEALTH FOUNDATION: $17,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $15,500 · Health+1 more: $1,050 · HealthCENTER OF HOPE HAITI INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesTHREE ANGELS CHILDREN'S RELIEF INC: $4,600 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE: $2,000 · Human ServicesIndividual grant recipient: $10,500 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $9,500 · OtherMILLIMAN GIVING FUND: $7,500 · OtherLIBERTY WILDLIFE CENTER: $5,500 · OtherFoothills Food Bank: $5,000 · OtherSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $17,500 · OtherTRI-COUNTY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $4,000 · Other+3 more: $1,100 · OtherWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $26,250 · EnvironmentST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $25,750 · Food & Nutrition
International$439,000Animals$205,850Health$66,050Human Services$41,600Other$60,600Environment$26,250Food & Nutrition$25,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF JOURNEY HOUSE ACTIONS RWANDA INC: $416,500 over 5y, 15% of budgetRAMAPO-BERGEN ANIMAL REFUGE INC: $102,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetCENTER OF HOPE HAITI INC: $35,000 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetSPASTIC PARAPLEGIA FOUNDATION INC: $32,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $30,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $30,350 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $26,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $25,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSEATTLE FOUNDATION: $17,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHONORHEALTH FOUNDATION: $17,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $15,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetArizona Humane Society: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOOTHILLS ANIMAL RESCUE: $12,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $11,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $9,500 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetPAWS OF WAR INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPeaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHREE ANGELS CHILDREN'S RELIEF INC: $4,600 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTRI-COUNTY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWAYNE TOWNSHIP MEMORIAL FIRST AID SQUAD INC: $1,050 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF CENTRAL & NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPOMPTON FALLS VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT 3: $400 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbia Bank Foundat…American Express Foun…The Pfizer Foundation…The Bank of America C…American Endowment Fo…The Blackbaud Giving …Paypal Charitable Giv…Network for GoodAmerican Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Columbia Bank FoundationNJ15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbia Bank Foundation · American Express Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Silvio and Sally J Ingui Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Silvio and Sally J Ingui Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Silvio and Sally J Ingui Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to Silvio and Sally J Ingui Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Silvio and Sally J Ingui’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home