How much did Silicon Valley De-Bug grant in FY2024?

Silicon Valley De-Bug reported 16 grants totaling $780,272 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is Silicon Valley De-Bug based?

Silicon Valley De-Bug is based in CA.

Silicon Valley De-Bug

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

Silicon Valley De-Bug

Silicon Valley De-Bug is a grassroots community organization based in San Jose, CA comprised of young people and families from disadvangaged communities coming together to give voice to our typically unseen and unheard experiences through education, training, and media productions.

$780k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$110k

Largest

01What you fund

0183% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2023–2024.

Human Services$308kCommunity Improvement$100kCrime & Legal$84kReligion$80kPhilanthropy$80kArts & Culture$48kHealth$30kHousing & Shelter$30kOther$151k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2023

participatory defensedefense activitiesdefense east

2024

campaigns activitiesrja implementtionimplementtion activitiesrja implementationimplementation activitiesactivities post

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $8k
$10k–50k12 grants · $340k
$50k–250k3 grants · $211k

$30,000

Median grant

States reached

$4.4M

Total assets

Largest grants

Communities United for Restorative Youth Justice$110,000
We Resolve$51,000
Project South$50,250
Communities In Partnership$40,000
Praxis Project$30,000
Pillars of the Community$30,000
Starting Over Inc$30,000
Amelia Ann Adams Whole LIfe Center$30,000
California Coalition for Women Prisoners co Network on Women in Prison$30,000
Charitable Ventures of OC$30,000
DayOneNotDayTwo$30,000
Movement Alliance Project$30,000
Tides Advocacy Fund$20,000
Rich Family Ministries$20,000
Community Shares Inc$20,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $308k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 9%. 97% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$439k · 6 repeat orgs$472k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$439k

$163k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+290%

+3976%

Still filing today

100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $309k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyCrime & LegalArts & CultureReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CU
Communities United for Restorative Youth Justice
2× · 2023–2024 · $140k · revenue +398%
RF
Rich Family Ministries
2× · 2023–2024 · $80k · revenue +39% · 40% of their budget
Communities In Partnership
2× · 2023–2024 · $70k · revenue +1887%

Funded once

HB
HAITIAN BRIDGE ALLIANCEgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $70k · revenue +4527%
CF
CITIZENS FOR PRISON REFORMgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $45k · revenue +161%
PP
PLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUNDgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +3976%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Communities Rise

Communities Rise fosters movements to build power in communities impacted by systemic oppression. To create an equitable system, we pursue cross-sector collaboration, and provide capacity building and legal services for community…

Crime & Legal

Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment

Center for Domestic Peace

Center for Domestic Peace mobilizes individuals and communities to transform our world so domestic violence no longer exists, creating greater safety, justice, and equality.

Human Services

Released

Released offers navigation and empowerment to the incarcerated, the newly released members of our society, and to their families.

Crime & Legal

Civil Survival Project

Civil Survival organizes system-impacted people, provides legal representation, and advocates for policy reform to restore opportunity to communities harmed by the criminal legal system.

Community Improvement

Fund for Justice

Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…

Crime & Legal

Critical Resistance

Critical Resistance seeks to build an international movement to end the prison industrial complex by challenging the belief that caging and controlling people makes us safe.

Crime & Legal

Pico California

Founded in 1994 as a fiscally-sponsored project of the national Faith in Action Network and spun off as an independent 501c3 nonprofit in 2021 along with the 501c4 PICO California Action Fund, we are a network of organizations that,…

Public Benefit

Citizens Project

Citizens project is a fearless, bold advocate and an engaging voice that empowers and challenges our entire community to embrace equity, inclusion, and justice.

Human Services

Pennsylvania United

PA United organizes and builds power across Western PA to create

Civil Rights

Partnership for the Advancement of New Americans

We advocate for the full economic, social, and civic inclusion of refugees and displaced populations in the San Diego region, throughout California, and across the country.

Human Services

Advancing Real Change Inc

Create a more just world by advancing empathy, dignity, and equity within and beyond the criminal legal system.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Praxis Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Reality Speaking Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

20/20

Grantees still filing

17/20

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Human Services$308,250Other$211,250Community Improvement$100,000Crime & Legal$83,573Religion$80,250Philanthropy$80,000Arts & Culture$47,900

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The California EndowmentCA19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The California Endowment · The Heising-Simons Foundation · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Tides Center · The California Wellness Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation · Tides Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Impactassetsinc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation Silicon Valley De-Bug funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Rich Family Ministries.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

3 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 832371365 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Rich Family Ministries, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 40% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Silicon Valley De-Bug?

Find your warmest path to Silicon Valley De-Bug through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

Silicon Valley De-Bug

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Silicon Valley De-Bug?

More from the funding graph

Silicon Valley De-Bug

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Silicon Valley De-Bug?

More from the funding graph