Skip to content

· Private foundation

Silberstein Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$402k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$161kPhilanthropy$157kHealth$156kCivil Rights$16kInternational$15kArts & Culture$13kHuman Services$12kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $2k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $400k
$100,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$48k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UJA FEDERATION OF NY$150,000
HIAS FOUNDATION INC$150,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER$100,000
JIMMY FUND$1,000
NO US WITHOUT YOU LA$500
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHRYSALIS: $500 → 11%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $500 → 14%CHRYSALIS: $250 → 11%UNITED HOSPICE: $750 → 14%DOROT: $2k → 9%UNITED HOSPICE: $750 → 14%UNITED HOSPICE: $250 → 14%UNITED HOSPICE: $250 → 14%DOROT: $250 → 9%UNITED HOSPICE: $250 → 14%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $250 → 17%PUPPIES BEHIND BARS: $250 → 17%DOROT: $750 → 17%DOROT: $750 → 17%DOROT: $500 → 17%DOROT: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MN
IL
NY
MA
IA
CT
CA
MD
AZ
SC
DC
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$392k · 57 repeat orgs$164k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

57 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 53 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

57
27

Total granted

$392k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+15%

Still filing today

70%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $151k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureInternationalHuman ServicesCivil RightsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $154k · revenue +39%
  • TJ
    THE JEWISH MUSEUM
    6× · 2018–2024 · $9k · revenue +43%
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    7× · 2018–2024 · $8k · revenue +80%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • NA
    NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS OF NEW YORK CITY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +44%
  • GH
    GREENWICH HOSPITAL - BENDHEIM CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
Jewish Community Relations Council of New York

Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.

Civil Rights
3
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
4
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
5
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
6
Food Allergy Science Initiative Inc

To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.

—
7
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
8
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
9
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
10
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
11
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
12
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
52/53
Grantees still filing
40/53
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HIAS FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 · OtherHIAS FOUNDATION INCMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $101,000 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTERPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $11,550 · Other+47 more: $53,500 · Other+47 moreUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $154,250 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION …+3 more: $4,000 · PhilanthropyDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $7,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,000 · HealthFSHD SOCIETY: $4,750 · HealthBRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION: $2,000 · HealthCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $2,000 · HealthCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY GREATER NY & CT INC: $1,750 · HealthPROJECT ALS INC: $1,500 · HealthWhite Plains Hospital Medical Center: $1,000 · Health+3 more: $1,000 · HealthMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,500 · InternationalHIAS INC: $4,750 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $3,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $2,250 · InternationalSEEDS OF PEACE INC: $1,500 · InternationalANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $8,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $4,000 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $2,000 · Civil RightsTREVOR PROJECT INC: $1,250 · Civil RightsTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $1,000 · Civil RightsTHE JEWISH MUSEUM: $8,600 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $2,500 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM: $1,000 · Arts & CultureZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC: $750 · Arts & CultureAMERICA-ISRAEL CULTURAL FOUNDATION INC: $750 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $250 · Arts & CultureDOROT INC: $4,250 · Human ServicesUNITED HOSPICE INC: $2,250 · Human ServicesChrysalis Shelter for Victims of Domestic Violence Inc: $750 · Human ServicesPUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $500 · Human ServicesDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $500 · Human Services
Other$316,050Philanthropy$158,250Health$26,000International$17,000Civil Rights$16,250Arts & Culture$13,850Human Services$8,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $154,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM: $8,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $8,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $5,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $5,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFSHD SOCIETY: $4,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC: $4,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDOROT INC: $4,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $3,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK CARES INC: $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $2,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $2,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED HOSPICE INC: $2,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $2,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $2,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $1,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED: $1,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY GREATER NY & CT INC: $1,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSEEDS OF PEACE INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT ALS INC: $1,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS OF NEW YORK CITY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF JCC KRAKOW INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetADAMAH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWhite Plains Hospital Medical Center: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SUMMER CAMP INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChrysalis Shelter for Victims of Domestic Violence Inc: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA-ISRAEL CULTURAL FOUNDATION INC: $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JED FOUNDATION: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY ACTION FUND INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPublic Health Institute: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds FSHD SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds HIAS INC ↗
  • Who funds DOROT INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK CARES INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC ↗
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds UNITED HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHTFOCUS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY GREATER NY & CT INC ↗
  • Who funds SEEDS OF PEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT ALS INC ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mother Cabrini Health Foundation IncNY13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Silberstein Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Silberstein Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Adamah Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Silberstein Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Silberstein Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Silberstein’s filings →

More from the funding graph