Skip to content
Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management

To provide leadership, funding and operational support for projects that improve individual and community health status and well being in underserved communities.

$6.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
80
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$2.5M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$34MYouth Development$26MHuman Services$24MCivil Rights$18MCrime & Legal$16MCommunity Improvement$14MPhilanthropy$14MEducation$9.2MOther$0
02FY2024 · 80 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k51 grants · $1.2M
  • $50k–250k24 grants · $2.2M
  • $250k+2 grants · $3.3M
$35,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$203M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SIERRA HEALTH FOUNDATION$2,500,000
CATALYST CALIFORNIA$762,746
YOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER$240,000
LIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION$175,000
TWO FEATHERS NATIVE AMERICAN FAMILY SERVICES$125,000
SISKIYOU COUNTY JOB COUNCIL$125,000
COMMUNITY ALLIANCE WITH FAMILY FARMERS FOUNDATION$125,000
THE FRESNO CENTER$102,000
NEIGHBORHOOD INDUSTRIES$100,000
EAST BAY ASIAN LOCAL DEVELPMENT CORPORATION$100,000
MONTEREY BAY ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP$100,000
CENTER ON RACE POVERTY & ENVIRONMENT$93,720
FAITH IN THE VALLEY$88,720
DOLORES C HUERTA FOUNDATION$83,720
IMPROVE YOUR TOMORROW$80,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $35.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SENIORS FIRST INC: $180k → 6%THE CAMBODIAN FAMILY: $1.0M → 10%NEXUS YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $350k → 10%EMPOWER YOLO INC: $1.5M → 16%HUMAN RESPONSE NETWORK: $1.0M → 17%4TH SECOND: $300k → 10%TENGX CENTER OF THE NORTHSTATE INC: $260k → 14%FAMILY SERVICES OF TULARE COUNTY: $1.0M → 18%SILICON VALLEY DE-BUG: $1.5M → 8%LIVE VIOLENCE FREE: $349k → 8%SOCIAL ADVOCATES FOR YOUTH SAN DIEGO INC: $999k → 11%THE CAMBODIAN FAMILY: $200k → 10%CATHOLIC COUNCIL FOR THE SPANISH SPEAKING OF THE DIOCESE OF STOCKTON: $400k → 12%FAITH IN ACTION OF SAN GORGONIO PASS: $209k → 11%INDEPENDENT LIVING CENTER OF KERN COUNTY: $559k → 18%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF KERN: $500k → 18%SOMALI FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $510k → 11%SOMALI FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $350k → 11%HORN OF AFRICA COMMUNITY NORTH AMERICAN: $317k → 11%AMELIA ANN ADAMS WHOLE LIFE CENTER: $276k → 12%BERKELEY YOUTH ALTERNATIVES: $1.0M → 10%SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH INC: $275k → 14%LATINO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1.0M → 10%EVERY NEIGHBORHOOD PARTNERSHIP: $500k → 19%THE FRESNO CENTER: $804k → 19%THE FRESNO CENTER: $200k → 19%GREATER SACRAMENTO URBAN LEAGUE: $465k → 12%CENTER FOR YOUNG WOMENS DEVELOPMENT: $1.1M → 10%YOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER: $240k → 10%MUTUAL ASSISTANCE NETWORK OF DEL PASO HEIGHTS: $282k → 12%PCS FAMILY SERVICES: $263k → 14%GREATER SACRAMENTO URBAN LEAGUE: $225k → 12%JAPANESE COMMUNITY YOUTH COUNCIL: $1.3M → 10%ASIAN PACIFIC POLICY & PLANNING COUNCIL: $200k → 14%JAKARA MOVEMENT: $764k → 19%JAKARA MOVEMENT: $730k → 19%JAKARA MOVEMENT: $341k → 19%JAKARA MOVEMENT: $302k → 19%COMMUNITIES UNITED FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE: $1.1M → 10%JUDAHH PROJECT: $1.0M → 12%ROSE FAMILY CREATIVE EMPOWERMENT CENTER INC: $500k → 12%ROSE FAMILY CREATIVE EMPOWERMENT CENTER INC: $215k → 12%WIND YOUTH SERVICES: $627k → 12%LA FAMILIA COUNSELING CENTER INC: $1.0M → 12%SELF AWARENESS AND RECOVERY: $500k → 12%LA FAMILIA COUNSELING CENTER INC: $422k → 12%HMONG YOUTH AND PARENTS UNITED: $515k → 12%SACRAMENTO STEPS FORWARD: $234k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
MA
NV
IA
RI
CA
AZ
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$119M · 229 repeat orgs$61M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +70% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

229 repeat relationships: 52 still active in FY2024, 177 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

229
270

Total granted

$119M
$56M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+39%

Still filing today

91%
85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementEducationYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LM
    LITTLE MANILA RISING
    7× · 2017–2023 · $2.6M · revenue +838% · 84% of their budget
  • FB
    Fresno Building Healthy Communities
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2.6M · revenue +1% · 58% of their budget
  • FI
    FRESNO INTERDENOMINATIONAL REFUGEE MINISTRIES
    7× · 2017–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +312% · 54% of their budget

Funded once

  • CC
    CALIFORNIA CALLS EDUCATION FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $1.5M · revenue +8%
  • Empower Yolo Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $1.5M · revenue -14% · 35% of their budget
  • ROUND VALLEY INDIAN HEALTH CENTER INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1.4M · revenue +36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Donor Table

California Donor Table anchors a hub of donors, foundations, and community leaders. We pool together our resources to shape California into a truly democratic state that works for the people, not the powerful. Rooted in our commitment to…

Civil Rights
2
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
3
Legal Link

Legal Link removes legal barriers that prolong poverty by adding critically needed capacity to the legal ecosystem.

Crime & Legal
4
California Alliance of Caregivers

California Alliance of Caregivers represents the voices of relative and non-relative caregivers to promote the well-being of children in foster care. California Alliance of Caregivers provides training information support and advocacy for…

Health
5
California Consortium for Urban Indian Health

The mission of ccuih is to facilitate shared development resources for our members and to raise public awareness in order to support a health and wellness network that meets the needs of american indians living in urban communities in…

—
6
Community Impact Central Valley

To deliver comprehensive health and human service programs that improve the health and well-being of under-served california residents.

Health
7
Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment Action

The Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment (ACCE) Action is a grassroots, member-led, statewide community organization working with more than 16,000 members in six counties across California, dedicated to raising the voices of…

Human Services
8
Statewide California Coalition

The New California Coalition (NCC) is a forward-thinking organization with a bold mission: to identify and implement solutions that will pave the way for enduring, generational change in Sacramento and across the entire state of California.

Public Benefit
9
California School-Age Consortium Inc

The California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC) builds professional networks that provide training, leadership development and advocacy to ensure that all young people have access to high quality out-of-school time programs and to create a…

—
10
Central Coast Alliance United for a Sustainable Economy

CAUSE's mission is to build grassroots power to realize social, economic and environmental justice for the people of the Central Coast Region through policy research, leadership development, organizing and advocacy.

Community Improvement
11
Center for Community Advocacy

Provide Educational Programs, Health Services and Legal Services to Farm Workers at housing sites and throughout the Salinas Valley and promote improved living conditions.

—
12
California Black Health Network

The Organization advocates for health equity by leading and facilitating convenings in all regions of California for the purpose of providing policy analysis, research and training that promotes best practices, which supports the creation…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Education Training and Research Associates; the most unlike its peers is Sac Connect. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

492 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 492 of the 543 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

76
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
179
Early backer (in before they grew)
481/492
Grantees still filing
360/492
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LITTLE MANILA RISING: $2,646,085 · OtherFRESNO INTERDENOMINATIONAL REFUGEE MINISTRIES: $2,405,000 · Other+91 more: $61,914,871 · Other+91 moreJAKARA MOVEMENT: $2,242,970 · Human ServicesJAKARA MOVEMENTSilicon Valley De-Bug: $1,814,787 · Human ServicesSilicon Valley De-BugLa Familia Counseling Center Inc: $1,644,500 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER: $1,561,200 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITIES UNITED FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE DBA CURYJ: $1,520,900 · Human ServicesEmpower Yolo Inc: $1,499,829 · Human ServicesTHE FRESNO CENTER: $1,377,900 · Human ServicesJAPANESE COMMUNITY YOUTH COUNCIL: $1,326,160 · Human ServicesTHE CAMBODIAN FAMILY: $1,200,000 · Human Services+28 more: $17,148,157 · Human Services+28 moreSIERRA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $2,500,000 · HealthSIERRA HEALT…ROUND VALLEY INDIAN HEALTH CENTER INC: $1,378,112 · HealthROUND VALLEY…CHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION: $1,301,000 · HealthCHINESE PROG…FIGHTING BACK PARTNERSHIP INC: $1,284,500 · HealthFIGHTING BAC…Latino Leadership Council Inc: $1,072,000 · HealthLatino Leade…COMMUNITY HEALTH INITIATIVE NAPA COUNTY INC: $1,000,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY HE…FRESNO AMERICAN INDIAN HEALTH PROJECT: $1,000,000 · HealthFRESNO AMERI…California Health Collaborative: $998,523 · HealthCalifornia H…WALL-LAS MEMORIAS PROJECT: $927,135 · HealthCENTRAL CALIFORNIA ASTHMA COLLABORATIVE: $650,000 · Health+13 more: $5,357,339 · Health+13 moreSAN JOAQUIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,500,000 · PhilanthropySAN JOAQUI…COMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $2,180,700 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY …LIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION: $1,780,000 · PhilanthropyLIBERTY HI…Action Council of Monterey County Inc: $1,514,860 · PhilanthropyAction Cou…United Way of Merced County: $1,175,983 · PhilanthropyUnited Way…Roberts Family Development Center: $1,133,515 · PhilanthropyRoberts Fa…SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS: $1,000,000 · PhilanthropySOUTHERN C…El Dorado Community Foundation: $902,368 · PhilanthropyEl Dorado …UNITED WAY OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $769,535 · PhilanthropyNORTH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $669,140 · Philanthropy+4 more: $1,544,308 · Philanthropy+4 moreFresno Building Healthy Communities: $2,607,039 · Community ImprovementFresno Bui…DOLORES C HUERTA FOUNDATION: $2,052,757 · Community ImprovementDOLORES C …FAITH IN THE VALLEY: $1,712,000 · Community ImprovementFAITH IN T…COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $1,639,763 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY …POLICYLINK: $1,072,609 · Community ImprovementPOLICYLINKSAN DIEGO ORGANIZING PROJECT: $1,020,736 · Community ImprovementSAN DIEGO …ASIAN AMERICAN LIBERATION NETWORK: $923,647 · Community ImprovementASIAN AMER…COMMUNITY MATTERS: $901,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY …EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT: $764,500 · Community ImprovementALCOHOL JUSTICE: $750,000 · Community Improvement+3 more: $1,081,787 · Community Improvement+3 moreCENTER ON RACE POVERTY & THE ENVIRONMENT: $1,566,815 · Crime & LegalMy Sisters House: $1,128,500 · Crime & LegalSAFE PASSAGES: $999,999 · Crime & LegalSANTA CRUZ BARRIOS UNIDOS INC: $840,498 · Crime & LegalROOT & REBOUND: $771,185 · Crime & LegalPENINSULA CONFLICT RESOLUTION CENTER: $700,000 · Crime & LegalCALIFORNIA RURAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE INC: $678,450 · Crime & LegalFresno Barrios Unidos: $580,000 · Crime & LegalLEGACY LA YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CORP: $515,632 · Crime & LegalTIME OF CHANGE: $300,000 · Crime & LegalEducation and Leadership Foundation: $1,765,822 · EducationNATIONAL ACADEMIC YOUTH CORPS INC: $1,089,769 · EducationUniversity of California Merced Foundation: $1,050,000 · EducationGATEWAY COMMUNITY CHARTERS: $1,009,922 · EducationVISION Y COMPROMISO: $937,442 · EducationCommunities For A New California Education Fund: $588,925 · EducationUNIVERSITY ENTERPRISES INC: $461,000 · EducationALWAYS KNOCKING INC: $433,822 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $300,000 · EducationACT for Women and Girls: $281,319 · Education
Other$66,965,956Human Services$31,336,403Health$17,468,609Philanthropy$15,170,409Community Improvement$14,525,838Crime & Legal$8,081,079Education$7,918,021

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLITTLE MANILA RISING: $2,646,085 over 7y, 84% of budgetFresno Building Healthy Communities: $2,607,039 over 2y, 58% of budgetSAN JOAQUIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,500,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetSIERRA HEALTH FOUNDATION: $2,500,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetFRESNO INTERDENOMINATIONAL REFUGEE MINISTRIES: $2,405,000 over 7y, 54% of budgetJAKARA MOVEMENT: $2,242,970 over 7y, 33% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES: $2,180,700 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetDOLORES C HUERTA FOUNDATION: $2,052,757 over 7y, 21% of budgetChinese for Affirmative Action: $1,890,093 over 8y, 3.9% of budgetEAST BAY ASIAN YOUTH CENTER: $1,875,601 over 4y, 29% of budgetSilicon Valley De-Bug: $1,814,787 over 7y, 73% of budgetLIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION: $1,780,000 over 7y, 4.8% of budgetEducation and Leadership Foundation: $1,765,822 over 7y, 30% of budgetFAITH IN THE VALLEY: $1,712,000 over 8y, 34% of budgetCENTER FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH AND WELL-BEING INC: $1,708,720 over 6y, 11% of budgetLa Familia Counseling Center Inc: $1,644,500 over 4y, 16% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $1,639,763 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetCENTER ON RACE POVERTY & THE ENVIRONMENT: $1,566,815 over 7y, 23% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER: $1,561,200 over 7y, 21% of budgetCOMMUNITIES UNITED FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE DBA CURYJ: $1,520,900 over 7y, 83% of budgetAction Council of Monterey County Inc: $1,514,860 over 5y, 12% of budgetCALIFORNIA CALLS EDUCATION FUND: $1,500,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetEmpower Yolo Inc: $1,499,829 over 1y, 35% of budgetTHE FRESNO CENTER: $1,377,900 over 6y, 7.3% of budgetCommunity Water Center: $1,336,676 over 8y, 23% of budgetJAPANESE COMMUNITY YOUTH COUNCIL: $1,326,160 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetCHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION: $1,301,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetFIGHTING BACK PARTNERSHIP INC: $1,284,500 over 1y, 78% of budgetSACRAMENTO AREA CONGREGATIONS TOGETHER: $1,256,500 over 4y, 63% of budgetTHE CAMBODIAN FAMILY: $1,200,000 over 2y, 64% of budgetUnited Way of Merced County: $1,175,983 over 7y, 28% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $1,151,056 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetLEADERSHIP COUNSEL FOR JUSTICE AND ACCOUNTABILITY: $1,141,496 over 7y, 5.9% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO: $1,137,980 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetRoberts Family Development Center: $1,133,515 over 7y, 15% of budgetMy Sisters House: $1,128,500 over 3y, 36% of budgetNATIONAL ACADEMIC YOUTH CORPS INC: $1,089,769 over 3y, 14% of budgetPOLICYLINK: $1,072,609 over 5y, 6.4% of budgetLatino Leadership Council Inc: $1,072,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetPREVENT CHILD ABUSE CALIFORNIA: $1,067,625 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetUniversity of California Merced Foundation: $1,050,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetFIRST STEP HOUSING: $1,037,518 over 1y, 51% of budgetSAN DIEGO ORGANIZING PROJECT: $1,020,736 over 6y, 64% of budgetLATINO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $1,020,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetHUMAN RESPONSE NETWORK INC: $1,020,000 over 2y, 34% of budgetCalifornia Youth Connection: $1,015,684 over 1y, 37% of budgetThe JUDAHH Project: $1,010,000 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetGATEWAY COMMUNITY CHARTERS: $1,009,922 over 2y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LITTLE MANILA RISING ↗
  • Who funds Fresno Building Healthy Communities ↗
  • Who funds SAN JOAQUIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRESNO INTERDENOMINATIONAL REFUGEE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds JAKARA MOVEMENT ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY INITIATIVES ↗
  • Who funds DOLORES C HUERTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Chinese for Affirmative Action ↗
  • Who funds EAST BAY ASIAN YOUTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Silicon Valley De-Bug ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY HILL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Education and Leadership Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FAITH IN THE VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH AND WELL-BEING INC ↗
  • Who funds La Familia Counseling Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds CENTER ON RACE POVERTY & THE ENVIRONMENT ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S FREEDOM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES UNITED FOR RESTORATIVE YOUTH JUSTICE DBA CURYJ ↗
  • Who funds Action Council of Monterey County Inc ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA CALLS EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds Empower Yolo Inc ↗
  • Who funds ROUND VALLEY INDIAN HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FRESNO CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Community Water Center ↗
  • Who funds JAPANESE COMMUNITY YOUTH COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds CHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FIGHTING BACK PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds SACRAMENTO AREA CONGREGATIONS TOGETHER ↗
  • Who funds THE CAMBODIAN FAMILY ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Merced County ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
  • Who funds LEADERSHIP COUNSEL FOR JUSTICE AND ACCOUNTABILITY ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds Roberts Family Development Center ↗
  • Who funds My Sisters House ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ACADEMIC YOUTH CORPS INC ↗
  • Who funds POLICYLINK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The California Endowm…The California Wellne…Sierra Health Foundat…Public Health Institu…Latino Community Foun…Kaiser Foundation Hos…California Physicians…The James Irvine Foun…Women's Foundation of…Sacramento Region Com…East Bay Community Fo…Sutter Valley Hospita…
The California EndowmentCA175.2× affinity228 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The California Endowment · The California Wellness Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation · Public Health Institute · Latino Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn · The James Irvine Foundation · Women's Foundation of California · Sacramento Region Community Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Sutter Valley Hospitals

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    103report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management?

    Find your warmest path to Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 543 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home