· Private foundation
Siemens Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k3 grants · $64k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $327k
- $250k+9 grants · $6.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH | $1,336,330 |
| AMALGAMATED CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $1,250,000 |
| NEW AMERICA FOUNDATION | $1,000,000 |
| NORTH CAROLINA BUSINESS COMMITTEE | $868,860 |
| NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES | $557,738 |
| CHOOSE HEALTHY LIFE | $500,000 |
| NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES | $500,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $250,316 |
| HEALTHY AMERICA FOUNDATION | $250,000 |
| CAREER PATH SCHOLARSHIP | $205,500 |
| NATIONAL CAREER TECH | $121,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $38,628 |
| FUNDERS TOGETHER TO END HOMELESSNESS | $15,000 |
| THE MILKEN INSTITUTE | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $120k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $504k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WAWASHINGTON ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH2× · 2022–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +38% · 25% of their budget
NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES3× · 2022–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +21%- NLNATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES INSTITUTE INC2× · 2021–2023 · $1.6M · revenue +35%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $1.6M
- NCNATIONAL CAREER TECHNICAL EDUCATIONone grant, 2020 · $698k
Feeding Americaone grant, 2021 · $600k · revenue +23%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the national coalition on health care (nchc) is to support research and analysis, develop and promote policy solutions, build consensus, and engage the public in order to ensure that america has a high quality health system…
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.
The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.
To provide patient-centered, quality-driven, whole-person healthcare services, accessible to everyone in our community.
Provide exceptional, integrated, patient-centered health care services designed to meet the needs of all patients, particularly those who experience barriers to accessing care, regardless of their ability to pay.
To provide culturally sensitive, coordinated primary care services emphasizing education, prevention, and advocacy, regardless of one's ability to pay.
To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.
To improve the health of our patients and community by providing high quality, cost-effective, culturally sensitive, patient-centered health care.
Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.
Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Side Community Health Services Inc and the most unlike its peers is Feeding America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NEW AMERICA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON ASSOCIATION FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY AMERICAS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CHOOSE HEALTHY LIFE ↗
- Who funds National Merit Scholarship Corporation ↗
- Who funds UI LABS INC ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF NEW YORK CITY ↗
- Who funds MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE INDIAN HEALTH BOARD ↗
- Who funds UNIDOSUS ↗
- Who funds DELAWARE VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds WESTERN WAYNE FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS ↗
- Who funds CHASE BREXTON HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FUNDERS TOGETHER TO END HOMELESSNES ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds Mary's Center for Maternal and Child Care Inc ↗
- Who funds WATTS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Cancer Society Inc · Direct Relief · American Heart Association Inc · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Reach Out and Read Inc · Gates Foundation · Raikes Foundation · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Ucare Minnesota · Seattle Foundation · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · The Kresge Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Siemens Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Newark Community Health Centers Inc — 20% of income from government
- National Association of Community Health Centers Inc — 12% of income from government
- Community Health Centers Inc — 7% of income from government
- Chase Brexton Health Services Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Siemens Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Siemens Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.