How much did UCARE MINNESOTA grant in FY2023?

UCARE MINNESOTA reported 2 grants totaling $83,505,992 in its FY2023 IRS filing.

Where is UCARE MINNESOTA based?

UCARE MINNESOTA is based in MN.

UCARE MINNESOTA

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

UCARE MINNESOTA

To operate a health maintenance organization dedicated to promoting the health of the community served by making quality health care available on an economically advantageous prepaid basis.

$84M

Granted FY2023

Grants

Communities

$80M

Largest

01What you fund

0185% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2023.

Health$132MEducation$13MHuman Services$796kFood & Nutrition$480kPhilanthropy$370kCrime & Legal$200kHousing & Shelter$140kYouth Development$118kArts & Culture$75kOther$27M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

unattributed pmapmncare membersopioidruralexpansionintegrated behavioralcontinuation

2019

—

2020

covidincrease accesswomenreduceclinicaldiseaseillness

2021

nutritious preparedfacing greatestgreatest prioritypriority placedplaced colorpositionspark

2022

medicaid membersend emergencygrowingcoveragemembers resumptionresumption eligibilityeligibility redeterminations

2023

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$80,000,000

Median grant

States reached

$1.5B

Total assets

Largest grants

UCARE FOUNDATION$80,000,000
UCARE KANSAS$3,505,992

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $796k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12% — the area typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of UCARE MINNESOTA’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in MN; read by stated purpose it is 92% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

UCARE MINNESOTAlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$158M · 37 repeat orgs$16M to everyone else

37 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 36 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$158M

$12M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%

+53%

Still filing today

73%

71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.5M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionPhilanthropyEducationYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

UF
UCARE Foundation
7× · 2017–2023 · $113M · revenue +173% · 99% of their budget
UO
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION
2× · 2020–2022 · $13M · revenue +67%
AH
Allina Health
4× · 2017–2022 · $2.6M · revenue +39%

Funded once

UI
UCARE IOWA
one grant, 2022 · $5.5M · 100% of their budget
PN
PARK NICOLLET CLINIC HSM
one grant, 2020 · $722k
EI
ESSENTIA INSTITUTE OF RURAL HEALTH
one grant, 2020 · $350k · revenue +24%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Trinity Health

Meeting the needs of the whole person through quality health care and health-related services.

Health

Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health

Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic

Advancing health through research, education, clinical practice, and community partnerships; providing each person the best care in the right place, at the right time, every time.

Health

Glencoe Regional Health Services

To improve every life by offering high-quality, safe, and accessible healthcare.

Health

Central Minnesota Mental Health Center

Fostering healthy lives and thriving communities.

Health

Minnesota Business Partnership

To maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans.

—

United Hospital District

Provision of health care services

Health

Minnesota Hospital Association

Advance the health of individuals and communities through leadership, advocacy, and collaboration on behalf of minnesota hospitals and health systems.

Community Improvement

Northland Health Care Access

Operating an integrated community health system providing access to health care for the uninsured low income residents of three counties in Missouri who are ineligible for other

Health

Care Providers of Minnesota

Empower members to excellence through advocacy, education, knowledge, resources and support.

—

Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

Central maine healthcare corporation supports its affiliated healthcare institutions in order for these entities to provide exceptional healthcare services.

Health

Northern Pines Mental Health Center

Mental health and substance use services

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Family Practice Health Center and the most unlike its peers is Allina Health System. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/116

the rest of the field

11%

2,380/21,257

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

84 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

83/84

Grantees still filing

66/84

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$131,722,000Other$27,004,173Education$13,462,000Human Services$796,000Food & Nutrition$480,151Philanthropy$370,000Crime & Legal$200,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ucare FoundationMN75.2× affinity33 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ucare Foundation · Medica Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Greater Twin Cities United Way · Otto Bremer Trust · Allina Health System · The Minneapolis Foundation · Delta Dental of Minnesota Foundation · Group Health Inc · Minnesota Association of Community · Fr Bigelow Foundation · Mayo Clinic

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation UCARE MINNESOTA funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: UCARE IOWA.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~2618 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 2 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

2 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 880661315 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on UCARE IOWA, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 2618 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 100% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Ucare Minnesota?

Find your warmest path to Ucare Minnesota through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

UCARE MINNESOTA

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

84 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Ucare Minnesota?

More from the funding graph

UCARE MINNESOTA

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

84 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Ucare Minnesota?

More from the funding graph