Skip to content
Sidney Katzman and Robert Katzman Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Sidney Katzman and Robert Katzman Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$106kArts & Culture$83kHealth$57kPhilanthropy$27kInternational$13kHuman Services$9kFood & Nutrition$6kAnimals$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,250
Median grant
2
States reached
$40k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DETROIT INST OF ARTS$1,250
FAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC GARDEN$625
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $515) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%ANGELS FOR HUMANITY: $265 → 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $250 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$239k · 13 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
27

Total granted

$239k
$73k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+5%

Still filing today

31%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $77k · revenue +46%
  • SP
    SEVEN PONDS NATURE CENTER INC
    5× · 2018–2023 · $6k · revenue +38%
  • TW
    The Woody Foundation Inc dba The Way Forward Foundation
    4× · 2020–2024 · $5k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • CF
    CPR FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • AI
    AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
    one grant, 2020 · $13k
  • KH
    KRISTI HOUSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +95%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mymichigan Health Foundation

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes by conducting or supporting activites exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the…

Health
2
Miami Children's Museum Inc Fka Miami Youth Museum

Miami children's museum is a non-profit educational institution, which meets the needs of all children in our multicultural community. visitors of all ages are encouraged to play together, learn, imagine, and create. the museum offers…

Arts & Culture
3
Mount Sinai Medical Center Foundation

To raise funds to support mount sinai medical center of florida, inc., a not-for-profit acute care teaching and research facility, so that it may provide high quality health care to our diverse community enhanced through teaching,…

Health
4
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
5
St Joseph's Hospital of Tampa Foundation Inc

St. joseph's hospitals foundation secures, manages and stewards philanthropic support to benefit the health care mission of st. joseph's hospital, st. joseph's women's hospital, st. joseph's children's hospital of tampa, st. joseph's…

Health
6
Miami Valley Hospital Foundation

Enhance the patient and family experience at miami valley hospital by raising community support for cutting-edge programs and services which help build healthy communities.

Health
7
Children's Hospital Medical Center of Akron

To improve the health of children, teenagers and young adults through excellence in patient care, education, research, advocacy and community partnerships.

Health
8
Trinity Health - Michigan

We, trinity health-michigan and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. trinity health-michigan is a member of trinity health.

Health
9
Mercy Foundation Inc

We, mercy health system of chicago and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.mercy foundation is a member of mercy health system of chicago…

Philanthropy
10
Memorial Healthcare Foundation

Through fund development, we serve our community by assisting memorial healthcare achieve its mission to promote health and provide quality compassionate healthcare in the shiawassee region.

Education
11
Sarasota Memorial Healthcare Foundation Inc

Sarasota memorial healthcare foundation is the philanthropic partner that helps sarasota memorial health care system bring world-class care to our community.

Health
12
Miami University Foundation

Support of miami university

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Service; the most unlike its peers is Cpr Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $81,180 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBANBURY CROSS THERAPY CENTER: $31,140 · OtherBANBURY CROSS THERAPY CENTERTEMPLE BETH EL: $18,960 · OtherTEMPLE BETH ELAMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE: $12,500 · OtherAMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEEMIAMI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $8,243 · Other+22 more: $34,870 · Other+22 moreTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $76,550 · Arts & CultureTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ART…+2 more: $1,450 · Arts & CultureCPR FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyCPR FOUNDA…The Woody Foundation Inc dba The Way Forward Foundation: $4,800 · PhilanthropyThe Woody …+1 more: $250 · PhilanthropyKRISTI HOUSE INC: $7,750 · Crime & LegalSEVEN PONDS NATURE CENTER INC: $5,550 · EnvironmentFAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC GARDEN INC: $1,045 · EnvironmentCHILDREN'S LEUKEMIA FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN: $1,500 · HealthBEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $500 · HealthHEART TO HEART HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $250 · HealthANGELS FOR HUMANITY: $265 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $250 · Human Services
Other$186,893Arts & Culture$78,000Philanthropy$30,050Crime & Legal$7,750Environment$6,595Health$2,250Human Services$515

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $76,550 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetKRISTI HOUSE INC: $7,750 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSEVEN PONDS NATURE CENTER INC: $5,550 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetThe Woody Foundation Inc dba The Way Forward Foundation: $4,800 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S LEUKEMIA FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBirmingham Bloomfield Art Ctr Inc: $1,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC GARDEN INC: $1,045 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVIZCAYA MUSEUM AND GARDENS TRUST INC: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANGELS FOR HUMANITY: $265 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEART TO HEART HOSPICE FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOOLCRAFT COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗
  • Who funds KRISTI HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds SEVEN PONDS NATURE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds The Woody Foundation Inc dba The Way Forward Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S LEUKEMIA FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds Birmingham Bloomfield Art Ctr Inc ↗
  • Who funds FAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds BEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VIZCAYA MUSEUM AND GARDENS TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds ANGELS FOR HUMANITY ↗
  • Who funds HEART TO HEART HOSPICE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds THE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds OLD NEWSBOYS GOODFELLOW FUND OF DETROIT MICHIGAN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Mightycause Charitabl…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Raymond James Charita…Natl Christian Charit…The Bank of America C…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI15× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sidney Katzman and Robert Katzman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sidney Katzman and Robert Katzman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Kristi House Inc: 49% of income from government
  • Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Vizcaya Museum and Gardens Trust Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sidney Katzman and Robert Katzman’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home