Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Shulman-Rochambeau Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$274k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0185% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$909kEnvironment$242kAnimals$110kEducation$34kPhilanthropy$32kReligion$24kCivil Rights$17kHealth$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $201k
$1,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$49k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHATTERED GLOBE THEATRE COMPANY$100,000
Individual grant recipient$50,625
CHIKAMING OPEN LANDS$50,000
AMERICAN WRITERS MUSEUM$20,000
BROWN UNIVERSITY$10,000
DIAN FOSSEY GORILLA FUND$10,000
MICHIANA HUMANE SOCIETY & SPCA$5,000
PORCHLIGHT MUSIC THEATRE$5,000
ACLU OF ILLINOIS$4,500
REMY BUMPPO THEATRE COMPANY$2,500
AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND$2,500
HAITI SCHOOL FUNDST PAUL & THE REDEEMER$1,500
ACORN THEATER$1,500
ADVANCE ILLINOIS$1,000
NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $500) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RIVER VALLEY SENIOR CENTER: $500 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
SD
IN
NJ
CA
CO
MO
MD
TN
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.5M · 31 repeat orgs$71k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +35% for the ones you funded once.

31 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
30

Total granted

$1.5M
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+35%

Still filing today

42%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentEducationHealthFood & NutritionCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SG
    Shattered Globe Theatre
    6× · 2017–2022 · $308k · revenue +104%
  • CO
    CHIKAMING OPEN LANDS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $226k · revenue +282%
  • TA
    THE AMERICAN WRITERS MUSEUM
    9× · 2017–2025 · $178k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • TF
    TRUST FOR VIRGIN ISLANDS LANDS
    one grant, 2021 · $11k · revenue +7%
  • P
    Porchlight
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
  • GT
    GOODMAN THEATER
    one grant, 2019 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Maritime Museum

Operation of a nautical history museum.

2
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
3
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
4
Museum of American Finance

Finance impacts everyone. as a socially relevant organization, the museum of american finance seeks to improve understanding of the influence of financial institutions and capital markets on the u.s. and global economies, and on…

5
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
6
Delaware Museum of Nature and Science Inc

The museum is an educational corporation formed to ignite a life-long passion for exploring, discovering, and valuing nature and science.

7
Institute for Conservation Leadership

To support healthy communities and a healthy earth, the institute for conservation leadership strengthens leaders, organizations, coalitions and networks.

Community Improvement
8
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

9
Music Institute of Chicago

The music institute of chicago ("music institute") leads people toward a lifelong engagement with music, by providing widely accessible resources for high quality music teaching, performing, and service activities.

Arts & Culture
10
National Tropical Botanical Garden

To enrich life by perpetuating tropical plants, ecosystems and cultural heritage through discovery, scientific research, conservation, and education.

Environment
11
Chicago Zoological Society

To inspire conservation leadership by connecting people with wildlife and nature.

Animals
12
Chicago Theatre Group Inc

The chicago theatre group is committed to producing both classic and contemporary works giving full voice to a wide range of artists and visions. by dedicating itself to three guiding principles - quality, equity, and community - the…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Old Town School of Folk Music and the most unlike its peers is Medical Aid to Northern Uganda. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLand Conservation Organizat…Wildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Classical Music EnsemblesEducation Equity LeadershipUrban Agriculture & Food Ac…Government Accountability R…Native Hawaiian Community D…Senior Support ServicesFood Pantries & AssistanceChristian Missionary Organi…Jewish Community FederationsAffordable Housing Developm…Community FoundationsProfessional Ballet Compani…Community Arts Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr18%15%10–20yr15%30%20–35yr14%21%35–55yr22%33%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr18%23%10–20yr15%69%20–35yr14%6%35–55yr22%2%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/35
the rest of the field
12%
8,891/72,324

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
25/34
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Timeline Theatre — $174,100 · OtherTimeline TheatreSHATTERED GLOBE THEATRE COMPANY — $169,000 · OtherSHATTERED GLOBE THEATRE COMPANYIndividual grant recipient — $164,845 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMICHIANA HUMANE SOCIETY & SPCA — $78,050 · OtherMICHIANA HUMANE SOCIETY & SPCADian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc — $32,000 · OtherKELLOGG ANNUAL FUND — $30,000 · Other+36 more — $145,972 · Other+36 moreShattered Globe Theatre — $308,250 · Arts & CultureShattered Globe TheatreTHE AMERICAN WRITERS MUSEUM — $178,000 · Arts & CultureTHE AMERICAN WRITERS MUSEUM+10 more — $30,600 · Arts & Culture+10 moreCHIKAMING OPEN LANDS — $225,776 · EnvironmentCHIKAMING OPEN LA…TRUST FOR VIRGIN ISLANDS LANDS — $11,100 · Environment+3 more — $3,975 · EnvironmentAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND — $13,500 · EducationADVANCE ILLINOIS NFP — $2,250 · EducationMONROE MANDOLIN CAMP — $1,032 · EducationCHICAGO JEWISH DAY SCHOOL — $750 · EducationCHICAGO'S GREEN CITY MARKET PROGRAM — $8,450 · Food & NutritionGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $500 · Food & NutritionCenter for Conflict Resolution — $2,000 · HealthInternational Society for Frontotemporal Dementias Inc — $1,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $250 · HealthBERRIEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · Philanthropy
Other$793,967Arts & Culture$516,850Environment$240,851Education$17,532Food & Nutrition$8,950Health$3,250Philanthropy$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetShattered Globe Theatre — $308,250 over 6y, 24% of budgetCHIKAMING OPEN LANDS — $225,776 over 9y, 3.4% of budgetTHE AMERICAN WRITERS MUSEUM — $178,000 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetDian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc — $32,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND — $13,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTRUST FOR VIRGIN ISLANDS LANDS — $11,100 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetRemy Bumppo Theatre Company — $9,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCHICAGO'S GREEN CITY MARKET PROGRAM — $8,450 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetLAKEVIEW ORCHESTRA INC — $7,100 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetTHE JOFFREY BALLET — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN NATURE ASSOCIATION — $2,975 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetADVANCE ILLINOIS NFP — $2,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOLD TOWN SCHOOL OF FOLK MUSIC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPONY EXPRESS MUSEUM INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCHICAGO YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBERRIEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Glass — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCenter for Conflict Resolution — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMONROE MANDOLIN CAMP — $1,032 over 1y, 1.2% of budget3ARTS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHOW-ME CENTRAL HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Society for Frontotemporal Dementias Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHICAGO JEWISH DAY SCHOOL — $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFERNWOOD INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICAL AID TO NORTHERN UGANDA — $500 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIVER VALLEY SENIOR CENTER INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Shattered Globe Theatre
  • Who funds CHIKAMING OPEN LANDS
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN WRITERS MUSEUM
  • Who funds Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund International Inc
  • Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND
  • Who funds TRUST FOR VIRGIN ISLANDS LANDS
  • Who funds Remy Bumppo Theatre Company
  • Who funds CHICAGO'S GREEN CITY MARKET PROGRAM
  • Who funds LAKEVIEW ORCHESTRA INC
  • Who funds THE JOFFREY BALLET
  • Who funds MICHIGAN NATURE ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds ADVANCE ILLINOIS NFP
  • Who funds OLD TOWN SCHOOL OF FOLK MUSIC
  • Who funds PONY EXPRESS MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds CHICAGO YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAS
  • Who funds BERRIEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Museum of Glass

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL20.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · Ncrc Community Development Fund Inc · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Gaylord and Dorothy Donnelley Foundation · Arie and Ida Crown Memorial · Circle of Service Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Shulman-Rochambeau Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • United States Naval Institute3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph