Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Short Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$467k
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Youth Development$414kArts & Culture$281kReligion$277kPhilanthropy$234kInternational$162kHealth$136kEducation$125kHuman Services$107kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $58k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $268k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $141k
$10,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
High Country Young Life$90,000
Samaritan's Purse$51,000
Community in Christ Lutheran Church$30,000
Lake City Church$30,000
American Heart Association$20,000
Convoy of Hope$20,000
Ronald McDonald House$20,000
Moffitt Cancer Center$20,000
Home for Our Troops$15,000
Pine Lake Preparatory$12,500
American Red Cross$10,000
Feeding America$10,000
Davidson Cornelius Child Development Center$10,000
American Family Association$10,000
Banner Elk Christian Fellowship$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MOORESVILLE CHRISTIAN MISSION: $3k → 9%ADA JENKINS FAMILIES AND CAREERS DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $10k → 10%Ada Jenkins Families and Careers Development Center Inc: $10k → 10%RELATIVES: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
IL
WI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
MS
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 61 repeat orgs$364k to everyone else

61 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 38 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

61
56

Total granted

$1.7M
$278k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+65%

Still filing today

26%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $86k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureReligionYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    4× · 2021–2025 · $192k · revenue +38%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $153k · revenue +163%
  • HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $61k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • OS
    OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • LC
    LAKE CITY CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $35k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY
    one grant, 2021 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
2
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
3
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
4
American Bible Society

Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.

Religion
5
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

6
Prison Fellowship International

To transform the lives of prisoners, their families, and victims through a global network of ministry partners.

Crime & Legal
7
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
8
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
9
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
10
Floresta Usa Incorporated

Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

International
11
The Presbyterian Hospital

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health
12
Presbyterian Hospital Foundation

In the spirit of keeping our focus on patient-centered, equitable and compassionate care while ensuring our organization is sustainable for future generations, we have restated our mission, vision and values and are now guided by our…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope and the most unlike its peers is Peninsula Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsFood Banks and PantriesAnimal Rescue and ShelterEnvironmental Conservation …Christian Missionary Organi…Youth Development ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%6%<5yr16%17%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr14%22%20–35yr12%25%35–55yr12%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%1%<5yr16%40%5–10yr20%5%10–20yr14%15%20–35yr12%29%35–55yr12%9%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/41
the rest of the field
15%
7,957/53,139

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 125 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/28
Grantees still filing
20/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Young Life High Country — $90,000 · OtherYoung Life High CountryDAV CORN CHILD DEV CENTER — $55,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS — $52,500 · OtherOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY — $50,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE — $45,000 · OtherBIG BROTHER BIG SISTER — $41,000 · OtherLake City Church — $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $40,000 · Other+100 more — $749,394 · Other+100 moreCORNELIUS ARTS COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $227,681 · Arts & CultureCORNELIUS ART…PENINSULA FOUNDATION INC — $26,000 · Arts & CulturePENINSULA FOU…YOUNG LIFE — $192,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFEHOPE HOUSE INC — $32,800 · Youth DevelopmentHOPE HOUSE I…SAMARITAN'S PURSE — $152,500 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S…AMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION INC — $60,000 · ReligionAMERICAN FA…American Heart Association Inc — $56,000 · HealthATRIUM HEALTH FOUNDATION — $10,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $7,000 · HealthHINDS' FEET FARM INC — $5,000 · Health+3 more — $5,500 · HealthHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC — $61,000 · Housing & ShelterCONVOY OF HOPE — $40,000 · InternationalMatthew 25 Ministries Inc — $15,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $3,000 · International
Other$1,162,894Arts & Culture$253,681Youth Development$224,800Religion$212,500Health$83,500Housing & Shelter$61,000International$58,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCORNELIUS ARTS COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $227,681 over 8y, 3.7% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $192,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $152,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC — $61,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION INC — $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $56,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE HOUSE INC — $32,800 over 4y, 12% of budgetPENINSULA FOUNDATION INC — $26,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetPine Lake Preparatory — $22,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAda Jenkins Families and Careers Development Center Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFeeding America — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUNCOAST HUMANE SOCIETYINC — $17,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMatthew 25 Ministries Inc — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPRISON FELLOWSHIP MINISTRIES — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $8,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWine to Water — $6,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHINDS' FEET FARM INC — $5,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMooresville Area Christian Mission Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe High Country Charitable Foundation — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE RELATIVES INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPULMONARY FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CORNELIUS ARTS COMMUNITY CENTER INC
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN FAMILY ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE
  • Who funds HOPE HOUSE INC
  • Who funds PENINSULA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Pine Lake Preparatory
  • Who funds Ada Jenkins Families and Careers Development Center Inc
  • Who funds Feeding America
  • Who funds SUNCOAST HUMANE SOCIETYINC
  • Who funds Matthew 25 Ministries Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for the CarolinasNC19.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · Duke Energy Foundation · Jena and Bob Gallagher Foundation · The Peninsula Community Foundation · The Presbyterian Hospital · The Covia Foundation · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Baird Foundation Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Short Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 125 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph