Skip to content

· Private foundation

Shimada Lee Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$22kEducation$4kSocial Science$2kInternational$1kEnvironment$300Health$150Human Services$150Crime & Legal$40Other$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
3
States reached
$18k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Campus Crusade For Christ$1,200
Venture Christian Church$1,200
Arican Inland Mission$500
Institute for Principle Studies$360
Family Protection Ministries$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Wounded Warrior Project: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NJ
CA
CO
KY
DC
OK
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$26k · 10 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
14

Total granted

$26k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+50%

Still filing today

50%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionHuman ServicesAnimalsPhilanthropyInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    ANSWERS IN GENESIS INC
    3× · 2018–2021 · $350 · revenue +112%
  • LO
    Living on the Edge Ministries Inc
    3× · 2020–2022 · $350 · revenue +24%
  • TK
    THE KING'S ACADEMY
    2× · 2018–2020 · $91 · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • NC
    Noble Call Institute
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • TI
    The International Foundation
    one grant, 2018 · $735 · revenue -31%
  • RF
    RESCUE- FREEDOM INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2021 · $480 · revenue +2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Instituto De Estudios Teologicos

Conference

Education
2
Foundational Questions Institute
Philanthropy
3
The Institute On Religion and Public Life Inc

The institute on religion and public life is an interreligious, nonpartisan research and educational 501(c)(3) organization. the institute's mission is to articulate a governing consensus that supports: (see schedule o)- a religiously…

—
4
Explore God Network
—
5
Biblical Studies Foundation
Religion
6
The Pathway International
Philanthropy
7
Liberty Initiative

Biblical worldview advancement

Religion
8
Patriae Institute
—
9
International Catholic Jurists Forum Inc

The International Catholic Jurists Forum (ICJF) was established to produce, compile, and share resources on fundamental human rights under attack in the regional and international human rights protection systems. It operates as a forum for…

Religion
10
Prison Fellowship International

To transform the lives of prisoners, their families, and victims through a global network of ministry partners.

Crime & Legal
11
For Freedom International

The primary exempt purpose of and published mission statement is to break the chains of oppression so that people have an opportunity to encounter jesus christ and to live in freedom and to change the world

Religion
12
International Buddhist Education Foundation
Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is The International Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VENTURE CHRISTIAN CHURCH: $17,020 · OtherVENTURE CHRISTIAN CHURCHCampus Crusade For Christ: $3,550 · OtherCampus Crusade For ChristNoble Call Institute: $2,000 · OtherNoble Call Institute+11 more: $2,020 · Other+11 moreInstitute for Principle Studies: $3,080 · EducationInstitute for …NEW CENTURY EDUCATORS INC: $665 · EducationNEW CENTURY ED…+1 more: $91 · EducationANSWERS IN GENESIS INC: $350 · ReligionLiving on the Edge Ministries Inc: $350 · ReligionPROMISE KEEPERS: $170 · ReligionRESCUE- FREEDOM INTERNATIONAL: $480 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 · Human ServicesMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $300 · AnimalsThe Freedom Story: $100 · InternationalFOOTHILL-DEANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGES FOUNDATION: $20 · Philanthropy
Other$24,590Education$3,836Religion$870Human Services$580Animals$300International$100Philanthropy$20

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetInstitute for Principle Studies: $3,080 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetThe International Foundation: $735 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW CENTURY EDUCATORS INC: $665 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRESCUE- FREEDOM INTERNATIONAL: $480 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANSWERS IN GENESIS INC: $350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLiving on the Edge Ministries Inc: $350 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROMISE KEEPERS: $170 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Freedom Story: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KING'S ACADEMY: $91 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOTHILL-DEANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGES FOUNDATION: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Institute for Principle Studies ↗
  • Who funds The International Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NEW CENTURY EDUCATORS INC ↗
  • Who funds RESCUE- FREEDOM INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds ANSWERS IN GENESIS INC ↗
  • Who funds Living on the Edge Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PROMISE KEEPERS ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds The Freedom Story ↗
  • Who funds THE KING'S ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds FOOTHILL-DEANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGES FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA11.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shimada Lee Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shimada Lee Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Shimada Lee’s filings →

More from the funding graph