Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Shade Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$134k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$54k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Youth Development$254kEducation$197kHuman Services$88kReligion$54kPhilanthropy$45kHealth$24kArts & Culture$22kPublic Benefit$22kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $49k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $54k
$1,907
Median grant
5
States reached
$5k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNION LEAGUE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS$54,290
MIAMI UNIVERSITY$25,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
SERVICE LEAGUE OF CRYSTAL LAKE$11,835
IMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH$7,500
FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION$5,000
EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION$3,000
CLEARBROOK$2,500
FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH$2,500
KELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT$2,500
ARMED FORCES COUNCIL OF CHICAGO$1,907
MATTHIAS ACADEMY CORPORATION$1,500
LUMINARTS CULTURAL FOUNDATION$1,000
OCCUPAWS GUIDE DOG ASSOCIATION$1,000
OCEAN REEF CHAPEL FOUNDATION$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CLEARBROOK: $3k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOME AND AID: $250 → 14%CHILDREN'S HOME AND AID: $250 → 14%CHILDREN'S HOME AND AID: $250 → 14%CHILDREN'S HOME AND AID: $250 → 14%CHILDREN'S HOME AND AID: $250 → 14%CHILDREN'S HOME AND AID: $250 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$637k · 27 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
10

Total granted

$637k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+39%

Still filing today

63%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UL
    UNION LEAGUE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS
    6× · 2019–2024 · $254k · revenue +61%
  • SL
    SERVICE LEAGUE OF CRYSTAL LAKE INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $50k · revenue +126%
  • OR
    OCEAN REEF CHAPEL FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $29k · revenue ×19

Funded once

  • JH
    JOHNSBURG HIGH SCHOOL
    4× · 2021–2024 · $6k
  • NM
    NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $5k
  • JD
    JOHNSBURG DISTRICT 12
    one grant, 2019 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Maritime Museum

Operation of a nautical history museum.

2
The Chicago Club

The chicago club is and shall continue to be the premier club in the city of chicago, serving the business, civic, educational, and philanthropic leaders, and their families, by providing a private club with outstanding dining, service,…

3
The Chicago Bar Foundation

The chicago bar foundation brings the legal community together through advocacy, funding, and innovation to improve access to justice for people in need and to make the legal system more fair, equitable, and effective.

Education
4
Union League Club of Chicago

See schedule o.the union league club of chicago (the "club") provides a unique opportunity for its members to participate as a leader in promoting civic, philanthropic and cultural matters of common interest. our offerings focus on…

5
Lake Forest College

Provide post-secondary education leading to a baccalaureate degree. Program service expenditures are made in conjunction with the operation of a liberal arts college spread over 107 acres with approximately 63 educational and support…

Education
6
Chicago Rowing Foundation

To promote foster and support both sweep rowing and sculling to youth and adults in the Greater Chicago Metropolitan Area and to educate coach and train the general public in skills relating to rowing and in-water safety.

7
Chicago Federation of Labor and Industrial Union Council

Labor council

8
The Chicago Community Loan Fund

Organization provides low-cost, flexible financing to non-profit and for-profit community development organizations for the revitalization of low and moderate income neighborhoods throughout metropolitan chicago.

Community Improvement
9
Illinois Credit Union League

Support state and federally chartered credit unions in illinois by providing education, advocacy and compliance services allowing them to prosper in the financial marketplace.

10
Legal Aid Chicago

At legal aid chicago, we work together to provide high quality civil legal aid to people living in poverty and other vulnerable groups.through advocacy, education, collaboration, and litigation we empower individuals, protect fundamental…

Crime & Legal
11
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
12
The 100 Club of Illinois

The 100 club of illinois provides resources, several forms of financial support, access to training, and moral support to the families of first responders who have lost their lives in the line of duty and active duty first responders. all…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Union League Boys and Girls Clubs and the most unlike its peers is Armed Forces Council of Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDisability and Senior Resid…Chicago Theater & Dance Com…College Fraternity Organiza…Local Economic DevelopmentCommunity Arts OrganizationsVeterans Service Organizati…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 64 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr18%10%10–20yr17%19%20–35yr14%10%35–55yr17%62%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr18%2%10–20yr17%14%20–35yr14%5%35–55yr17%80%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
15%
5,348/34,771

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
19/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MIAMI UNIVERSITY — $104,386 · OtherMIAMI UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient — $68,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOCEAN REEF CHAPEL FOUNDATION INC — $28,500 · OtherOCEAN REEF CHAPEL FOUNDATION INCOCEAN REFF MEDICAL CENTER — $20,500 · OtherOCEAN REFF MEDICAL CENTERKELLOGG SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT — $15,000 · OtherIMMANUEL LUTHERAN CHURCH — $12,500 · OtherLUMINARTS CULTURAL FOUNDATION THE UNION LEAGUE CLUB OF CHICAGO — $11,000 · Other+23 more — $66,027 · Other+23 moreUNION LEAGUE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS — $253,514 · Youth DevelopmentUNION LEAGUE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBSSERVICE LEAGUE OF CRYSTAL LAKE INC — $49,931 · Community ImprovementOCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 · PhilanthropyArmed Forces Council of Chicago — $21,907 · Public BenefitOCCUPAWS GUIDE DOG ASSOCIATION — $7,000 · Human ServicesMATTHIAS ACADEMY CORPORATION — $3,000 · Human ServicesCLEARBROOK — $2,500 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILL — $1,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $500 · Human ServicesILLINOIS RAILWAY MUSEUM INC — $10,800 · Arts & CultureCYT Chicago Inc — $525 · Arts & Culture
Other$325,913Youth Development$253,514Community Improvement$49,931Philanthropy$45,000Public Benefit$21,907Human Services$14,500Arts & Culture$11,325

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNION LEAGUE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS — $253,514 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetSERVICE LEAGUE OF CRYSTAL LAKE INC — $49,931 over 6y, 7.3% of budgetOCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetOCEAN REEF CHAPEL FOUNDATION INC — $28,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetArmed Forces Council of Chicago — $21,907 over 4y, 10.0% of budgetLUMINARTS CULTURAL FOUNDATION THE UNION LEAGUE CLUB OF CHICAGO — $11,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetILLINOIS RAILWAY MUSEUM INC — $10,800 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOCCUPAWS GUIDE DOG ASSOCIATION — $7,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetMATTHIAS ACADEMY CORPORATION — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCLEARBROOK — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHI KAPPA TAU FOUNDATION — $1,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLambda Chi Alpha Educational Foundation — $1,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LAND CONSERVANCY OF MCHENRY COUNTY — $1,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetALPHA XI DELTA FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY — $1,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILL — $1,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCrystal Lake Little League Baseball Inc — $700 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCYT Chicago Inc — $525 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNSSRA FOUNDATION — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNION LEAGUE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS
  • Who funds SERVICE LEAGUE OF CRYSTAL LAKE INC
  • Who funds OCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds OCEAN REEF CHAPEL FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Armed Forces Council of Chicago
  • Who funds LUMINARTS CULTURAL FOUNDATION THE UNION LEAGUE CLUB OF CHICAGO
  • Who funds ILLINOIS RAILWAY MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds OCCUPAWS GUIDE DOG ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MATTHIAS ACADEMY CORPORATION
  • Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CLEARBROOK
  • Who funds PHI KAPPA TAU FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Lambda Chi Alpha Educational Foundation
  • Who funds THE LAND CONSERVANCY OF MCHENRY COUNTY
  • Who funds ALPHA XI DELTA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME & AID SOCIETY OF ILL
  • Who funds Crystal Lake Little League Baseball Inc
  • Who funds CYT Chicago Inc
  • Who funds NSSRA FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL16× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Shade Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Shade Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Shade Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph