Skip to content

· Private foundation

Senville Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$119kArts & Culture$50kEducation$45kPublic Benefit$29kInternational$20kFood & Nutrition$12kCivil Rights$9kEnvironment$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$353k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HASBRO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$7,500
BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE$6,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FOUNDATION$6,000
CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER$2,500
FARE$2,500
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$2,000
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMAN$2,000
NEW ISRAEL FUND$2,000
THE TOMORROW FUND$2,000
FRIENDS OF THE ARAVA INSTITUTE$1,000
MAZON$1,000
RED BRICK SCHOOL$500
CELIAC DISEASE FOUNDATION$250
NATIONAL PARK TRUST$250
SKIDMORE COLLEGE ANNUAL FUND$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HOPE HEALTH: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NY
MA
RI
CA
VA
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$282k · 22 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
7

Total granted

$282k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+112%

Still filing today

55%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementHealthHousing & ShelterEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $31k · revenue +182%
  • MA
    MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger
    7× · 2017–2025 · $12k · revenue +50%
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $11k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • V
    VOTEORG
    one grant, 2020 · $4k · revenue -83%
  • MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALSgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +49%
  • NATIONAL LOW INCOME HOUSING COALITIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +140%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

—
2
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
3
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
4
American Israel Public Affairs Committee

To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.

International
5
Issue One

Issue one is the leading crosspartisan political reform organization that educates the public, engages capitol hill, and advocates for solutions to fix our broken political system.

Public Benefit
6
News Media Alliance

The news media alliance (nma) is a nonprofit organization representing nearly 2,000 news media organizations and their multi-media platform businesses in the us, canada and europe.

—
7
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
8
Namati Inc

Namati, inc. (namati) is dedicated to putting the law in people's hands. we strive to build a just world, in which every one of us can take part in the decisions and demand accountability from the institutions that affect our lives.…

Crime & Legal
9
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
10
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
11
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
12
Public Media Nj Inc

To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is National Park Trust Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HASBRO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $76,500 · OtherHASBRO CHILDREN'S HOSPITALTOCKWOTTON OF THE WATERFRONT: $49,750 · OtherTOCKWOTTON OF THE WATERFRONTPLANNED PARENTHOOD FOUNDATION: $18,100 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD FOUNDATIONRED BRICK SCHOOL: $12,000 · OtherRED BRICK SCHOOLMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $11,750 · OtherFARE: $11,500 · OtherTHE TOMORROW FUND: $10,500 · OtherVOTO LATINO INC: $7,500 · Other+13 more: $25,500 · Other+13 moreWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $31,000 · EducationWILLIAM J B…NEW ISRAEL FUND: $19,500 · InternationalTHE CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER INC: $15,500 · Crime & LegalALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $11,400 · HealthCELIAC DISEASE FOUNDATION: $500 · HealthNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN GREATER MIAMI SECTION: $6,500 · Community ImprovementNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED: $2,000 · Community ImprovementFRIENDS OF ARAVA THE INSTITUTE LTD: $6,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL PARK TRUST INC: $650 · EnvironmentGREENPEACE FUND INC: $350 · Environment
Other$223,100Education$31,000International$19,500Crime & Legal$15,500Health$11,900Community Improvement$8,500Environment$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC: $31,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND: $19,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER INC: $15,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $11,750 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $11,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TOMORROW FUND: $10,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetVOTO LATINO INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN GREATER MIAMI SECTION: $6,500 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF ARAVA THE INSTITUTE LTD: $6,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetVOTEORG: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL LOW INCOME HOUSING COALITION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROCK THE VOTE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL PARK TRUST INC: $650 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCELIAC DISEASE FOUNDATION: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREENPEACE FUND INC: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TOMORROW FUND ↗
  • Who funds VOTO LATINO INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN GREATER MIAMI SECTION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ARAVA THE INSTITUTE LTD ↗
  • Who funds VOTEORG ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL LOW INCOME HOUSING COALITION ↗
  • Who funds ROCK THE VOTE ↗
  • Who funds HOPEHEALTH ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARK TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds CELIAC DISEASE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GREENPEACE FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Senville Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Senville Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 51%
  • National Park Trust Inc: 51% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Senville’s filings →

More from the funding graph