Skip to content

· Private foundation

Seltzer Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$228k
Granted FY2025still arriving
67
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$894kReligion$347kInternational$202kCivil Rights$146kScience & Tech$85kAnimals$81kHealth$72kArts & Culture$64kOther$0
02FY2025 · 67 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k58 grants · $125k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $103k
$1,500
Median grant
13
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION$15,000
EARTH JUSTICE$15,000
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL$12,500
RAINFOREST TRUST$10,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGAN DAVID ALO$10,000
ANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE$10,000
FRIENDS OF YEMIN ORDE$10,000
HADASSAH$10,000
NEW ISRAEL FUND$10,000
FRIENDS OF YAD SARAH$7,500
CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL$7,500
UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS$7,500
SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER$5,500
WATERKEEPERS ALLIANCE$5,000
OCEANA$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 14% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BIG CAT RESCUE: $1k → 13%BIG CAT RESCUE: $1k → 13%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLI: $4k → 6%BIG CAT RESCUE: $1k → 13%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $300 → 7%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLI: $4k → 6%BIG CAT RESCUE: $500 → 13%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $200 → 7%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLI: $4k → 6%BIG CAT RESCUE: $500 → 13%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $100 → 7%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLI: $4k → 6%BIG CAT RESCUE: $500 → 13%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $100 → 7%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLI: $4k → 6%BIG CAT RESCUE: $500 → 13%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $100 → 7%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLI: $3k → 6%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $100 → 7%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER: $3k → 6%CHARITY NAVIGATOR: $100 → 7%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CNTR FOR B: $3k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLI: $2k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
NY
MA
OR
IA
PA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 78 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

78 repeat relationships: 56 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

78
39

Total granted

$1.8M
$60k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+47%

Still filing today

64%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentInternationalArts & CultureAnimalsHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $146k · revenue +41%
  • ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED
    9× · 2017–2025 · $92k · revenue +202%
  • EARTHJUSTICE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $77k · revenue +82%

Funded once

  • YO
    YEMIN ORDE
    one grant, 2018 · $19k
  • WI
    WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • LI
    LIFE IN A JAR FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
2
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
3
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
4
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
5
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment
6
Center for International Environmental Law Inc

To investigate, research, write, publish, present conferences and teach with respect to global, regional, transboundary, and comparative environmental issues and to make the findings from such activities available to the general public; to…

International
7
National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment
8
Conservation Law Foundation Inc

Conservation law foundation, inc. (clf) protects new england's environment for the benefit of all people and future generations. we use the law, science, and markets to create solutions that preserve and restore our natural resources,…

Environment
9
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
10
Climate Institute

The climate institute is organized for the purpose of educating the general public and policy makers as to the gravity of potential climate change, exploring the policy implications of the latest scientific findings on climate modelling…

Environment
11
Namati Inc

Namati, inc. (namati) is dedicated to putting the law in people's hands. we strive to build a just world, in which every one of us can take part in the decisions and demand accountability from the institutions that affect our lives.…

Crime & Legal
12
The International Dark-Sky Association Inc

Darksky international restores the nighttime environment and protects communities from the harmful effects of light pollution through outreach, advocacy, and conservation.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wildlife Conservation Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is East Whiteland Township Volunteer Fire Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

76 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 76 of the 133 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
75/76
Grantees still filing
54/76
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $145,500 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INCSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $133,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATIONENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $92,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATEDEARTHJUSTICE: $77,000 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICEOCEANA INC: $59,500 · EnvironmentOCEANA INCCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $49,500 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATIONFRIENDS OF THE EARTH: $43,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE EARTHWATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC: $37,000 · Environment+18 more: $104,665 · Environment+18 moreFRIENDS OF YEMIN ORDE: $124,500 · OtherFRIENDS OF YEMIN ORDEHADASSAH: $100,000 · OtherHADASSAHAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGAN DAVID ALO: $52,500 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGAN DAVID ALOPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUND BEIT BERI: $37,525 · OtherJNF: $35,638 · OtherTECHNION: $30,000 · OtherSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $25,500 · OtherSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $43,300 · OtherSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INCISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $29,250 · Other+72 more: $242,590 · Other+72 moreJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $66,700 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL F…RAINFOREST TRUST: $58,340 · InternationalRAINFOREST TRUSTNEW ISRAEL FUND: $48,500 · InternationalNEW ISRAEL FUNDAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $42,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS …THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $32,500 · InternationalTHE UNION OF CONC…WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE: $16,126 · InternationalHIAS INC: $15,000 · International+5 more: $25,700 · International+5 moreANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $56,750 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $21,850 · Civil RightsFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $58,650 · Health+1 more: $1,000 · HealthAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $17,500 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $16,000 · Arts & CultureTHE JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR THE RIGHTEOUS INC: $7,100 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureWHYY INC: $3,250 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $1,060 · Arts & CultureWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $45,500 · AnimalsPANTHERA CORPORATION: $2,000 · Animals+1 more: $1,000 · Animals
Environment$741,165Other$720,803International$304,866Civil Rights$78,600Health$59,650Arts & Culture$49,910Animals$48,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $145,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $133,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $92,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $77,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $66,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOCEANA INC: $59,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $58,650 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetRAINFOREST TRUST: $58,340 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $56,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $49,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND: $48,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $45,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $43,300 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE EARTH: $43,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $42,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC: $37,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $32,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $29,250 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $25,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEarth Island Institute Inc: $24,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $21,850 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $17,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE: $16,126 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $16,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC: $15,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC: $14,250 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNatural Lands Trust Inc: $12,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $11,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSHASTA LAND TRUST: $10,480 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetAMAZON CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budget350ORG: $9,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOWELL MILKEN CENTER FOR UNSUNG HEROES INC: $8,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetISRAEL EMERGENCY ALLIANCE: $7,700 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetKULANU INC: $7,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL INC: $7,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR THE RIGHTEOUS INC: $7,100 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR CLIMATE AND ENERGY SOLUTIONS INC: $6,750 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLECTIVE HERITAGE INSTITUTE: $6,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOUR CHILDREN'S TRUST: $5,985 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SISKIYOU LAND TRUST: $5,490 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG CAT RESCUE CORP: $5,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALLIANCE FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION: $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWHYY INC: $3,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAPPALACHIAN VOICES: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds OCEANA INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC ↗
  • Who funds RAINFOREST TRUST ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE EARTH ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Earth Island Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD RESOURCES INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds HIAS INC ↗
  • Who funds GALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds Natural Lands Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger ↗
  • Who funds SHASTA LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds AMAZON CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY13.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Seltzer Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Seltzer Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 88%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Seltzer Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Seltzer Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 133 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Seltzer Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph