Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Selfridge Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

International$37kHealth$16kFood & Nutrition$14kEnvironment$13kHuman Services$11kPhilanthropy$3kHousing & Shelter$3kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$186k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY (NOW BLOOD CANCER UNITED)$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
BELOVED ASHEVILLE$2,500
KISS THE GROUND$1,000
CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION$1,000
URBAN PROMISE INTERNATIONAL$1,000
HORIZON DAY CAMP$1,000
LITTLE PORTION FARM$1,000
THE CONSERVATION FUND$1,000
MARTHA'S TABLE$750
Individual grant recipient$750
Individual grant recipient$725
AT THE HOUSE INC$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%MERCY CHEFS: $2k → 20%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%HORIZON DAY CAMP: $1k → 19%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%HORIZON DAY CAMP: $1k → 19%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $600 → 14%HORIZON DAY CAMP: $1k → 19%HORIZON DAY CAMP: $500 → 19%HORIZON DAY CAMP: $500 → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 40% of Selfridge Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Selfridge Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 36% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$79k · 12 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +35% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
9

Total granted

$79k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+35%

Still filing today

83%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesEnvironmentHealthInternationalPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UI
    URBANPROMISE INTERNATIONAL
    7× · 2017–2024 · $37k · revenue +136%
  • THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    5× · 2018–2024 · $7k · revenue +78%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    4× · 2018–2023 · $5k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • KS
    KIDS SAFE ZONE (MARYLAND COMMUNITY HEALTH INITIATIVES)
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
  • FE
    FOOD EQUALITY INITIATIVE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue -79%
  • MC
    MERCY CHEFS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +147%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
2
Moveable Feast Inc

Moveable feast's mission is to improve the health of marylanders experiencing food insecurity and chronic illness by preparing and delivering medically tailored meals and providing nutrition education, thereby achieving racial, social, and…

3
Foodshot Global Inc

Accelerate the transformation to a healthy, sustainable and equitable food system.

Food & Nutrition
4
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
5
Eat Real Certified Inc

We empower food service programs and school districts to make food delicious, nourishing, and responsible through our evidence-based certification program. We provide education and support that inspires students, schools, and communities…

Public Benefit
6
Women's Foodservice Forum

Accelerate the advancement of women leaders in the food industry. we believe in limitless opportunity for all women.

Food & Nutrition
7
Waste Not Inc

Waste Not cultivates sustainable food systems that help people and the planet flourish. We do this by eliminating food waste and hunger through innovative community partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
8
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
9
Well Aware Inc

Well Aware's mission is to provide innovative and sustainable solutions to water scarcity and contamination in East Africa.

International
10
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
11
Food Action

Our mission is to educate, organize and advocate for food and farming systems to become economically prosperous, ecologically sound and socially equitable.

12
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Food Equality Initiative Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

URBANPROMISE INTERNATIONAL — $36,930 · InternationalURBANPROMISE INTERNATIONALLITTLE PORTION FARM — $7,500 · OtherLITTLE PORTION FARMLEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY (NOW BLOOD CANCER UNITED) — $5,000 · OtherLEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIET…KIDS SAFE ZONE (MARYLAND COMMUNITY HEALTH INITIATIVES) — $3,221 · OtherKIDS SAFE ZONE (MARYLAND C…Individual grant recipient — $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $1,925 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSHARE OUR STRENGTH — $1,000 · Other+5 more — $2,725 · Other+5 moreTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $6,750 · EnvironmentTHE CONSERVAT…PROTECT OUR WINTERS — $3,500 · EnvironmentPROTECT OUR W…CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · EnvironmentCHESAPEAKE BA…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $5,100 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARR…SUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC — $4,000 · Human ServicesSUNRISE DAY …MERCY CHEFS INC — $2,000 · Human ServicesMERCY CHEFS …THE FIBROLAMELLAR CANCER FOUNDATION — $3,250 · HealthGRASSROOTS CRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER CENTER INC — $2,500 · HealthCOOKIES FOR KIDS CANCER A NEW JERSEY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION — $1,000 · HealthFOOD EQUALITY INITIATIVE INC — $2,500 · Food & NutritionMARTHA'S TABLE INC — $1,925 · Food & NutritionWEDONTWASTE INC — $1,000 · Food & NutritionKISS THE GROUND — $1,000 · Food & NutritionThe William S Baer School — $3,333 · PhilanthropyBELOVED ASHEVILLE — $2,500 · Housing & Shelter
International$36,930Other$23,871Environment$12,250Human Services$11,100Health$6,750Food & Nutrition$6,425Philanthropy$3,333Housing & Shelter$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetURBANPROMISE INTERNATIONAL — $36,930 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $6,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $5,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC — $4,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPROTECT OUR WINTERS — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe William S Baer School — $3,333 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetTHE FIBROLAMELLAR CANCER FOUNDATION — $3,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBELOVED ASHEVILLE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRASSROOTS CRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER CENTER INC — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD EQUALITY INITIATIVE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMERCY CHEFS INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARTHA'S TABLE INC — $1,925 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOOKIES FOR KIDS CANCER A NEW JERSEY NON-PROFIT CORPORATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWEDONTWASTE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKISS THE GROUND — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA10.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Selfridge Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc2% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph