Skip to content
Selecthealth Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Selecthealth Inc

Helping people live the healthiest lives possible and being a model health plan by providing high-value health benefits and superior service at an affordable cost.

$593k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$3.3MFood & Nutrition$75kEducation$45kArts & Culture$31kHuman Services$18kYouth Development$15kCommunity Improvement$13kInternational$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 22 grants below total $301,168, the rows itemized in this filing. The $593,153 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $291,985 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $266k
$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.6B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ONE UTAH HEALTH COLLABORATIVE$30,000
CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC$25,000
PUENTES$25,000
RESEARCH EDUCATION & ACCESS TO COMMUNITY HEALTH$20,000
SALT LAKE COMMUNITY COLLEGE$15,000
URBAN FOOD CONNECTIONS OF UTAH$15,000
THE MICHAEL & JACALYN LEAVITT FOUNDATION$15,000
IMA FOUNDATION$15,000
IDAHO GOVERNOR'S CUP SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC$15,000
SUCCESS IN EDUCATION FOUNDATION$15,000
BABY'S BOUNTY$15,000
NAMPA HARVEST FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION$11,000
UTAH FOOD BANK$10,000
COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN IDAHO$10,000
COLLEGE OF EASTERN IDAHO FOUNDATION INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 49% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%BABY'S BOUNTY: $15k → 13%JANNUS INC: $13k → 8%NEVADA HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC: $10k → 13%UTAH FOSTER CARE FOUNDATION INC: $8k → 8%ALLIANCE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $6k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 15 repeat orgs$372k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +52% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
13

Total granted

$3.2M
$147k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+15%

Still filing today

73%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $225k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UH
    UTAH HEALTH POLICY PROJECT
    4× · 2017–2022 · $71k · revenue +119%
  • TY
    THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOISE CITY IDAHO
    4× · 2017–2023 · $70k · revenue +71%
  • IS
    IDAHO SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC
    5× · 2018–2023 · $66k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • OI
    OPERA IDAHO INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -22%
  • RM
    Ronald McDonald House Charities Of Idaho Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue -70%
  • US
    UTAH SUMMER GAMES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Utah Valley Chamber of Commerce

Stimulate local business establishment, growth, and development by facilitating business to business and business to community relationships throughout Utah County.

—
2
Rural Idaho & Mountain West Primary Care
Health
3
Southwest Utah Community Health Center

Making lives better in southwest utah by providing accessible, quality health care, regardless of financial, language, or cultural barriers.

Health
4
Idaho Medical Association Foundation Inc
Health
5
Intermountain End-Stage Renal Disease Network Inc

The mission/vision of Intermountain Quality Innovations (ImQI) is to advance the improvement of healthcare quality provided to people with acute and chronic conditions, including ESRD, through clinical & logistical support,…

—
6
National Kidney Foundation of Utah & Idaho

The National Kidney Foundation of Utah & Idaho, a major nonprofit health organization, is dedicated to preventing diseases of the kidney, improving the health and wellbeing of individuals and families affected by kidney disease, and…

Health
7
Intermountain Medical Holdings Nevada Inc

Helping people live the healthiest lives possible.

Health
8
Utah Shakespeare Festival Foundation
Arts & Culture
9
Idaho Community Foundation Inc

The idaho community foundation strengthens communities through philanthropy, elevating nonprofit impact, and connecting idahoans to create a place where everyone can contribute to thriving communities.

Philanthropy
10
Urban Indian Center of Salt Lake

To serve The People by honoring Native cultures, strengthening health and wellness programs, and cultivating community. We envision all Native peoples living balanced, prosperous, and healthy lives in diverse communities for Seven…

—
11
Idaho Technology Council Inc

To help technology companies in Idaho start, grow, and thrive.

—
12
Utah Humanities Council

Utah Humanities collaborates with libraries, museums, historical societies, schools, colleges, and cultural and civic groups; provides capacity-building opportunities for volunteers and professionals in the cultural sector; presents…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Junior League of Salt Lake Cityinc; the most unlike its peers is Ima Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/40
Grantees still filing
25/40
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SLC BIKE SHARE: $2,407,600 · Public BenefitSLC BIKE SHAREValley Regional Transit: $149,650 · OtherValley Regional Tran…THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOISE CITY IDAHO: $70,000 · OtherTHE YOUNG MENS CHRIS…UTAH LEAGUE OF CITIES AND TOWNS: $62,500 · OtherUTAH LEAGUE OF CITIE…UNIVERSITY OF UTAH: $45,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAHSALT LAKE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $45,000 · OtherSALT LAKE COMMUNITY …NAMPA HARVEST FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $33,000 · OtherPUENTES: $25,000 · OtherCLARK COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · OtherIDAHO GOVERNORS CUP SCHOLARSHIP FUND IN: $23,000 · Other+16 more: $171,418 · Other+16 moreUTAH HEALTH POLICY PROJECT: $71,000 · HealthSt Luke's Magic Valley Regional Medical Center Ltd: $41,000 · HealthRESEARCH EDUCATION AND ACCESS TO CO: $35,000 · HealthONE UTAH HEALTH COLLABORATIVE: $30,000 · HealthRonald McDonald House Charities Of Idaho Inc: $20,000 · HealthRonald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc: $14,000 · HealthFamily Health Services Corporation: $8,000 · Health+1 more: $5,765 · HealthIDAHO SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC: $66,000 · Arts & CultureOPERA IDAHO INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureIDAHO FALLS ARTS COUNCIL: $5,750 · Arts & CultureUrban Food Connections of Utah: $65,000 · Food & NutritionJUNIOR LEAGUE OF SALT LAKE CITYINC: $52,500 · Community ImprovementTHE CHRISTMAS BOX INTERNATIONAL: $6,500 · Community ImprovementBABY'S BOUNTY: $15,000 · Human ServicesJANNUS INC: $13,000 · Human ServicesNEVADA HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesUtah Foster Care Foundation Inc: $7,500 · Human ServicesALLIANCE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $6,000 · Human Services
Public Benefit$2,407,600Other$650,068Health$224,765Arts & Culture$96,750Food & Nutrition$65,000Community Improvement$59,000Human Services$51,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSLC BIKE SHARE: $2,407,600 over 6y, 52% of budgetUTAH HEALTH POLICY PROJECT: $71,000 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetTHE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOISE CITY IDAHO: $70,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetIDAHO SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC: $66,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetUrban Food Connections of Utah: $65,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF SALT LAKE CITYINC: $52,500 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetSt Luke's Magic Valley Regional Medical Center Ltd: $41,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRESEARCH EDUCATION AND ACCESS TO CO: $35,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetNAMPA HARVEST FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION: $33,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetONE UTAH HEALTH COLLABORATIVE: $30,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetPUENTES: $25,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetOPERA IDAHO INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetCLARK COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetIDAHO GOVERNORS CUP SCHOLARSHIP FUND IN: $23,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities Of Idaho Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION: $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBABY'S BOUNTY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetKEN GARFF FOR GOOD: $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetIMA FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetThe Michael & Jacalyn Leavitt Foundation: $15,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc: $14,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJANNUS INC: $13,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEVADA HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOLLEGE OF EASTERN IDAHO FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCollege of Western Idaho Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUTAH FOOD BANK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJunior Achievement of Utah & Idaho: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFamily Health Services Corporation: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSalt Lake Community College Foundation: $7,918 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUtah Foster Care Foundation Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER LAS VEGAS: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN UTAH: $7,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetIDAHO SENIOR GAMES: $7,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetTHE CHRISTMAS BOX INTERNATIONAL: $6,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Greater Las Vegas Chamber of Commerc: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $5,765 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIDAHO FALLS ARTS COUNCIL: $5,750 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ihc Health Services I…St Luke's Health Syst…Laura Moore Cunningha…Larry H Miller and Ga…George S and Dolores …Sorenson Legacy Found…Idaho Community Found…Blue Cross of Idaho F…Dominion Energy Chari…Saint Alphonsus Regio…Intermountain Communi…Simplot Company Found…
Ihc Health Services IncUT30× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ihc Health Services Inc · St Luke's Health System Ltd · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center Inc · Intermountain Community Care Foundation Inc · Simplot Company Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Selecthealth Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Selecthealth Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Selecthealth’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home