· Public charity
Selecthealth Inc
Helping people live the healthiest lives possible and being a model health plan by providing high-value health benefits and superior service at an affordable cost.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 22 grants below total $301,168 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $593,153 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $291,985 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $266k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ONE UTAH HEALTH COLLABORATIVE | $30,000 |
| CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC | $25,000 |
| PUENTES | $25,000 |
| RESEARCH EDUCATION & ACCESS TO COMMUNITY HEALTH | $20,000 |
| SALT LAKE COMMUNITY COLLEGE | $15,000 |
| URBAN FOOD CONNECTIONS OF UTAH | $15,000 |
| IDAHO GOVERNOR'S CUP SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC | $15,000 |
| SUCCESS IN EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| THE MICHAEL & JACALYN LEAVITT FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| IMA FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| BABY'S BOUNTY | $15,000 |
| NAMPA HARVEST FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION | $11,000 |
| COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN IDAHO | $10,000 |
| COLLEGE OF EASTERN IDAHO FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| THE COLLEGE OF WESTERN IDAHO FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 49% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $225k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UHUTAH HEALTH POLICY PROJECT4× · 2017–2022 · $71k · revenue +119%
- TYTHE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOISE CITY IDAHO4× · 2017–2023 · $70k · revenue +71%
- ISIDAHO SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC5× · 2018–2023 · $66k · revenue +32%
Funded once
- OIOPERA IDAHO INCone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -22%
- RMRonald McDonald House Charities Of Idaho Incone grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue -70%
- USUTAH SUMMER GAMES FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Stimulate local business establishment, growth, and development by facilitating business to business and business to community relationships throughout Utah County.
Making lives better in southwest utah by providing accessible, quality health care, regardless of financial, language, or cultural barriers.
The mission/vision of Intermountain Quality Innovations (ImQI) is to advance the improvement of healthcare quality provided to people with acute and chronic conditions, including ESRD, through clinical & logistical support,…
The National Kidney Foundation of Utah & Idaho, a major nonprofit health organization, is dedicated to preventing diseases of the kidney, improving the health and wellbeing of individuals and families affected by kidney disease, and…
Helping people live the healthiest lives possible.
The idaho community foundation strengthens communities through philanthropy, elevating nonprofit impact, and connecting idahoans to create a place where everyone can contribute to thriving communities.
To serve The People by honoring Native cultures, strengthening health and wellness programs, and cultivating community. We envision all Native peoples living balanced, prosperous, and healthy lives in diverse communities for Seven…
To help technology companies in Idaho start, grow, and thrive.
Utah Humanities collaborates with libraries, museums, historical societies, schools, colleges, and cultural and civic groups; provides capacity-building opportunities for volunteers and professionals in the cultural sector; presents…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Junior League of Salt Lake Cityinc and the most unlike its peers is Ima Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 10. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 33% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 20% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SLC BIKE SHARE ↗
- Who funds UTAH HEALTH POLICY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOISE CITY IDAHO ↗
- Who funds IDAHO SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds Urban Food Connections of Utah ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF SALT LAKE CITYINC ↗
- Who funds St Luke's Magic Valley Regional Medical Center Ltd ↗
- Who funds RESEARCH EDUCATION AND ACCESS TO CO ↗
- Who funds NAMPA HARVEST FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ONE UTAH HEALTH COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds OPERA IDAHO INC ↗
- Who funds PUENTES ↗
- Who funds IDAHO GOVERNORS CUP SCHOLARSHIP FUND IN ↗
- Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities Of Idaho Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Michael & Jacalyn Leavitt Foundation ↗
- Who funds IMA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KEN GARFF FOR GOOD ↗
- Who funds BABY'S BOUNTY ↗
- Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc ↗
- Who funds JANNUS INC ↗
- Who funds UTAH FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds NEVADA HOMELESS ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds JANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE OF EASTERN IDAHO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Junior Achievement of Utah & Idaho ↗
- Who funds College of Western Idaho Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Family Health Services Corporation ↗
- Who funds Salt Lake Community College Foundation ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER LAS VEGAS ↗
- Who funds Utah Foster Care Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN UTAH ↗
- Who funds IDAHO SENIOR GAMES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ihc Health Services Inc · St Luke's Health System Ltd · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Sorenson Legacy Foundation · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Blue Cross of Idaho Foundation for Health Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Saint Alphonsus Regional Medical Center Inc · Intermountain Community Care Foundation Inc · Simplot Company Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Selecthealth Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.