Skip to content
Segall Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Segall Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$230kPhilanthropy$77kEducation$76kHuman Services$49kRecreation & Sports$35kHousing & Shelter$10kYouth Development$10kFood & Nutrition$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$143k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S CRISIS TREATMENT CENTER$11,850
UNIVERSITY OF THE ARTS$10,000
PHILADELPHIA MURAL ARTS ADVOCATES$5,000
PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART$2,500
EMIR HEALING CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%EMIR HEALING CENTER: $1k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$289k · 9 repeat orgs$101k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
22

Total granted

$289k
$85k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+64%

Still filing today

100%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthEducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KC
    KIMMEL CENTER INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $127k · revenue +75%
  • CC
    CHILDREN'S CRISIS TREATMENT CENTER
    6× · 2017–2024 · $47k · revenue +56%
  • CB
    CAMP BAUERCREST INC
    4× · 2018–2023 · $32k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • TO
    TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PHILADELPHIA
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • PU
    PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +30%
  • MC
    MEDIA COLLECTIVE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +248%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Phillips Collection

The phillips collection is the oldest museum of modern and contemporary art in the u.s. in addition to presentation of works from the permanent collection and special exhibitions, the museum maintains active educational, academic,…

Arts & Culture
2
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
3
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education
4
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
5
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
6
The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia

The mission is "to understand the natural world and inspire everyone to care for it." the academy implements its mission through understanding the diversity of life; developing and applying science to protect the environment; and informing…

Science & Tech
7
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
8
Artphilly

The mission of artphilly is to amplify philadelphia's arts and culture by commissioning, presenting, producing, and promoting art of all kinds for local audiences and the world. its vision is to spotlight(continued on schedule o)the city…

Arts & Culture
9
Munson-Williams-Proctor Arts Institute

Munson-williams-proctor arts institute (mwpai) is a fine arts center dedicated to serving diverse audiences by advancing the appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of the arts. the art institute aims to promote interest and…

Arts & Culture
10
Manhattan School of Music

Manhattan school of music is deeply committed to excellence in education, performance, and creative activity; to the humanity of the school's environment; and to the cultural enrichment of the larger community. a premiere international…

Arts & Culture
11
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
12
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Curtis Institute of Music; the most unlike its peers is Madaket Land Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
26/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KIMMEL CENTER INC: $127,000 · Arts & CultureKIMMEL CENTER INCPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $15,500 · Arts & CulturePHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ARTWOODMERE ART MUSEUM: $7,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $12,750 · Arts & Culture+4 morePENNSYLVANIA ACADEMY OF THE FINE ARTS: $46,600 · EducationPENNSYLVANIA ACADEMY OF T…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $40,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSIT…PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITYTHE UNIVERSITY OF THE ARTS: $10,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF THE ART…DREXEL UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · Education+2 more: $1,500 · EducationCHILDREN'S CRISIS TREATMENT CENTER: $47,275 · HealthCHILDREN'S CRISIS…MEDIA COLLECTIVE INC: $10,000 · HealthMEDIA COLLECTIVE …HEALTHCORPS INC: $10,000 · HealthHEALTHCORPS INCVETRI FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN: $6,000 · HealthVETRI FOUNDATION …+3 more: $3,825 · HealthJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $76,235 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION…CAMP BAUERCREST INC: $32,300 · OtherCAMP BAUERCRE…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PHILADELPHIA: $20,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF T…HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · Other+7 more: $5,125 · Other+7 moreCENTER CITY DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Community ImprovementNANTUCKET LAND & WATER COUNCIL INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF RITTENHOUSE SQUARE: $2,300 · EnvironmentMADAKET LAND TRUST: $500 · Environment
Arts & Culture$162,250Education$113,100Health$77,100Philanthropy$76,235Other$59,425Community Improvement$10,000Environment$7,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKIMMEL CENTER INC: $127,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $76,235 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S CRISIS TREATMENT CENTER: $47,275 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA ACADEMY OF THE FINE ARTS: $46,600 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP BAUERCREST INC: $32,300 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $15,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIA COLLECTIVE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCENTER CITY DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetHEALTHCORPS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWOODMERE ART MUSEUM: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVETRI FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPHILADELPHIA MURAL ARTS ADVOCATES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET LAND & WATER COUNCIL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE BARNES FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY GREATER PHILADELPHIA: $1,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVERY MURDER IS REAL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetANDALUSIA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMADAKET LAND TRUST: $500 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetACTING WITHOUT BOUNDARIES: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNANTUCKET DREAMLAND FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEER MEDICAL SERV CORPS OF LM & NAR: $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia Foun…The Snider FoundationThe Saramar Charitabl…Henry Dolfinger 2 Tru…The Mitchell and Hila…Sidney and Sandy Brow…Le Vine Family Founda…Daniel M Tabas Family…Connelly FoundationUnited Way of Greater…The William Penn Foun…National Philanthropi…
The Philadelphia FoundationPA22.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · The Snider Foundation · The Saramar Charitable Fund · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · The Mitchell and Hilarie Morgan Family Foundation · Sidney and Sandy Brown Foundation Inc · Le Vine Family Foundation · Daniel M Tabas Family Foundation · Connelly Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The William Penn Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Segall Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Segall Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Nantucket Dreamland Foundation Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Berklee College of Music Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Segall Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home