Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Segall Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$230kPhilanthropy$77kEducation$76kHuman Services$49kRecreation & Sports$35kHousing & Shelter$10kYouth Development$10kFood & Nutrition$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$143k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S CRISIS TREATMENT CENTER$11,850
UNIVERSITY OF THE ARTS$10,000
PHILADELPHIA MURAL ARTS ADVOCATES$5,000
PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART$2,500
EMIR HEALING CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%EMIR HEALING CENTER: $1k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$289k · 9 repeat orgs$101k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
22

Total granted

$289k
$85k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+38%

Still filing today

100%
77%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthEducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KC
    KIMMEL CENTER INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $127k · revenue +75%
  • CC
    CHILDREN'S CRISIS TREATMENT CENTER
    6× · 2017–2024 · $47k · revenue +56%
  • CB
    CAMP BAUERCREST INC
    4× · 2018–2023 · $32k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • TO
    TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PHILADELPHIA
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • HI
    HEALTHCORPS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +89%
  • CC
    CENTER CITY DISTRICT FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +672%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Phillips Collection

The phillips collection is the oldest museum of modern and contemporary art in the u.s. in addition to presentation of works from the permanent collection and special exhibitions, the museum maintains active educational, academic,…

Arts & Culture
2
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
3
Saint Joseph's University

As philadelphia's jesuit catholic university, saint joseph's provides a rigorous, student-centered education rooted in the liberal arts. we prepare students for personal excellence, professional success, and engaged citizenship. striving…

Education
4
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
5
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
6
The Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia

The mission is "to understand the natural world and inspire everyone to care for it." the academy implements its mission through understanding the diversity of life; developing and applying science to protect the environment; and informing…

Science & Tech
7
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
8
Artphilly

The mission of artphilly is to amplify philadelphia's arts and culture by commissioning, presenting, producing, and promoting art of all kinds for local audiences and the world. its vision is to spotlight(continued on schedule o)the city…

Arts & Culture
9
Munson-Williams-Proctor Arts Institute

Munson-williams-proctor arts institute (mwpai) is a fine arts center dedicated to serving diverse audiences by advancing the appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of the arts. the art institute aims to promote interest and…

Arts & Culture
10
Manhattan School of Music

Manhattan school of music is deeply committed to excellence in education, performance, and creative activity; to the humanity of the school's environment; and to the cultural enrichment of the larger community. a premiere international…

Arts & Culture
11
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
12
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Curtis Institute of Music and the most unlike its peers is Madaket Land Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySupportive Housing for Vuln…Jewish Campus and Youth Pro…Family Philanthropic Founda…Historic Preservation Organ…Volunteer Fire & Emergency …Regional History MuseumsHealthcare Provider NetworksCoastal Community Organizat…Food Pantries and Hunger Re…Performing Arts Organizatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 52 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%7%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr20%20%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr10%47%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr16%0%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr20%32%20–35yr13%12%35–55yr10%52%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/33
the rest of the field
13%
4,156/31,983

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
26/31
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

KIMMEL CENTER INC — $127,000 · Arts & CultureKIMMEL CENTER INCPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART — $15,500 · Arts & CulturePHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ARTWOODMERE ART MUSEUM — $7,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more — $12,750 · Arts & Culture+4 morePENNSYLVANIA ACADEMY OF THE FINE ARTS — $46,600 · EducationPENNSYLVANIA ACADEMY OF T…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $40,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSIT…PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · EducationPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITYTHE UNIVERSITY OF THE ARTS — $10,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF THE ART…DREXEL UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · Education+2 more — $1,500 · EducationCHILDREN'S CRISIS TREATMENT CENTER — $47,275 · HealthCHILDREN'S CRISIS…HEALTHCORPS INC — $10,000 · HealthHEALTHCORPS INCMEDIA COLLECTIVE INC — $10,000 · HealthMEDIA COLLECTIVE …VETRI FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN — $6,000 · HealthVETRI FOUNDATION …+3 more — $3,825 · HealthJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $76,235 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION…CAMP BAUERCREST INC — $32,300 · OtherCAMP BAUERCRE…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PHILADELPHIA — $20,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF T…HEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · Other+7 more — $5,125 · Other+7 moreCENTER CITY DISTRICT FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Community ImprovementNANTUCKET LAND & WATER COUNCIL INC — $5,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF RITTENHOUSE SQUARE — $2,300 · EnvironmentMADAKET LAND TRUST — $500 · Environment
Arts & Culture$162,250Education$113,100Health$77,100Philanthropy$76,235Other$59,425Community Improvement$10,000Environment$7,800

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKIMMEL CENTER INC — $127,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $76,235 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S CRISIS TREATMENT CENTER — $47,275 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA ACADEMY OF THE FINE ARTS — $46,600 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP BAUERCREST INC — $32,300 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART — $15,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHCORPS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCENTER CITY DISTRICT FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDIA COLLECTIVE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetWOODMERE ART MUSEUM — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVETRI FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN — $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPHILADELPHIA MURAL ARTS ADVOCATES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET LAND & WATER COUNCIL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE BARNES FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCURTIS INSTITUTE OF MUSIC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHNETWORK FOUNDATION FKA HEALTH NET FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $1,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANDALUSIA FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEVERY MURDER IS REAL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMADAKET LAND TRUST — $500 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetACTING WITHOUT BOUNDARIES — $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNANTUCKET DREAMLAND FOUNDATION INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEER MEDICAL SERV CORPS OF LM & NAR — $75 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia FoundationPA22.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · The Snider Foundation · The Saramar Charitable Fund · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · The Mitchell and Hilarie Morgan Family Foundation · Sidney and Sandy Brown Foundation Inc · Le Vine Family Foundation · Daniel M Tabas Family Foundation · Connelly Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The William Penn Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Segall Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 4%
  • Nantucket Dreamland Foundation Inc4% of income from government
  • Berklee College of Music Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph