Skip to content

· Private foundation

Seedtime Fund Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$29k
Granted FY2023
15
Grants FY2023
7
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Arts & Culture$102kEmployment$38kHuman Services$38kPhilanthropy$32kHealth$31kFood & Nutrition$25kEducation$22kScience & Tech$20kOther$0
02FY2023 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$680k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHIPS$5,000
LEONARD PELTIER AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL$3,500
RADIO FREE GA BROADCASTING FOUNDATION$3,500
NATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE$3,500
MOTHERHOOD BEYOND BARS$2,000
STITCH BUFFALO$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF INDIANAPOLIS$1,500
SOUTHERN CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS$1,000
THE PHILANTHORPY WORKSHOP$1,000
TAOS SPORTS ASSOCIATES$1,000
UNIVERSITY OF CUMBERLANDS$1,000
MORGAN LIBRARY$1,000
THE CHAMP FOUNDATION$1,000
FORESTBURGH PLAYHOUSE$1,000
Romero Institute$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%DOMESTIC WORKERS UNITED: $1k → 20%COMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE: $9k → 20%CHIPS: $5k → 20%COMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE: $5k → 20%COMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE: $5k → 20%DOMESTIC WORKERS UNITED: $3k → 17%CHIPS: $5k → 20%COMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE: $4k → 20%CHIPS: $2k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ND
MN
NY
MA
IN
PA
CA
KY
MD
NM
NC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$387k · 33 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2023, 20 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
14

Total granted

$387k
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+98%

Still filing today

67%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyInternationalEducationEmploymentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RF
    RADIO FREE GEORGIA BROADCASTING ORGANIZATION INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $40k · revenue +173%
  • ND
    NATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE
    7× · 2017–2023 · $40k · revenue +45%
  • RC
    REFUGE COFFEE CO
    5× · 2017–2021 · $38k · revenue +143%

Funded once

  • SYRACUSE UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +29%
  • TT
    TREATMENT TRENDS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -26%
  • W
    WCECA
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Guernica Centre for InternationalJustice

The Guernica Centre for International Justice represents the interests of victims in national and international legal proceedings, putting in place transnational accountability strategies that seek to maximize the protection of victims'…

International
2
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
3
Grist Magazine Inc

Grist is an independent, non profit media organization dedicated to reporting on climate change.

Environment
4
City Report Inc

CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

Arts & Culture
5
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
6
Center for International Policy Inc

The center for international policy is a woman-led, progressive, independent nonprofit center for research, education, and advocacy working to advance a more peaceful, just, and sustainable u.s. approach to foreign policy. through…

International
7
The International Center

The International Center is a District of Columbia 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization founded in 1977, has as its principal purpose the promotion of greater international understanding and the lessening of international frictions and…

International
8
World Coffee Research

World coffee research unites the global coffee industry to drive science-based agricultural solutions to urgently secure a diverse and sustainable supply of quality coffee today and for generations to come. our mission is to grow, protect,…

International
9
Shift Project Ltd

At Shift, we have one purpose: to transform how business gets done in order to ensure respect for peoples lives and dignity. We believe that the best way to advance our mission is by working directly with Businesses to help shape their…

International
10
Compass Science Communication Inc

Compass champions, connects, and supports diverse scientist leaders to improve the well-being of people and nature.

Science & Tech
11
The Conversationalist
—
12
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Constitutional Rights; the most unlike its peers is National Dance Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
21/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAD HOUSERS INC: $18,000 · OtherMAD HOUSERS INCTaos Sports Associates Inc: $16,500 · OtherTaos Sports Associates IncFORESTBURGH PLAYHOUSE: $14,000 · OtherFORESTBURGH PLAYHOUSELEONARD PELTIER AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL: $13,000 · OtherLEONARD PELTIER AMNESTY INTERNATIONALUNIVERSITY OF CUMBERLANDS: $10,500 · Otherbronxcare hospital: $8,500 · OtherTALICA: $8,250 · OtherBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC: $7,500 · OtherTHE PHILANTHORPY WORKSHOP: $7,000 · OtherSouthern Center for Human Rights: $8,000 · OtherATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 · OtherNational Center for Science Education: $8,500 · Other+22 more: $68,500 · Other+22 moreRADIO FREE GEORGIA BROADCASTING ORGANIZATION INC: $39,500 · Arts & CultureRADIO FREE GEORGIA BRO…NATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE: $39,500 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL DANCE INSTITU…+2 more: $4,500 · Arts & Culture+2 moreREFUGE COFFEE CO: $38,000 · EmploymentREFUGE COFF…THE ALPHA WORKSHOPS INC: $5,500 · EmploymentTHE ALPHA W…COMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC: $33,500 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY …DOMESTIC WORKERS UNITED INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC W…FUND FOR SOUTHERN COMMUNITIES INC: $20,500 · PhilanthropyTHE PHILANTHROPY WORKSHOP INC DBA FORWARD GLOBAL: $4,500 · PhilanthropyFUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE: $7,500 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC: $7,000 · InternationalTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $7,000 · InternationalFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $14,500 · Community Improvement
Other$198,250Arts & Culture$83,500Employment$43,500Human Services$37,500Philanthropy$26,000International$21,500Community Improvement$14,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRADIO FREE GEORGIA BROADCASTING ORGANIZATION INC: $39,500 over 7y, 5.5% of budgetNATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE: $39,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetREFUGE COFFEE CO: $38,000 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC: $33,500 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetFUND FOR SOUTHERN COMMUNITIES INC: $20,500 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetTaos Sports Associates Inc: $16,500 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $14,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNational Center for Science Education: $8,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetSouthern Center for Human Rights: $8,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALPHA WORKSHOPS INC: $5,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHAMP FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetCENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: $5,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREATMENT TRENDS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PHILANTHROPY WORKSHOP INC DBA FORWARD GLOBAL: $4,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMOTHERHOOD BEYOND BARS INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE STORY COLLIDER INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSTITCH BUFFALO INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetROMERO INSTITUTE: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GLOBAL VILLAGE PROJECT INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Indianapolis: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFUND FOR THE CITY OF NEW YORK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RADIO FREE GEORGIA BROADCASTING ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL DANCE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds REFUGE COFFEE CO ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds FUND FOR SOUTHERN COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Taos Sports Associates Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds National Center for Science Education ↗
  • Who funds Southern Center for Human Rights ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE ↗
  • Who funds BROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ALPHA WORKSHOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CHAMP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TREATMENT TRENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PHILANTHROPY WORKSHOP INC DBA FORWARD GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds MOTHERHOOD BEYOND BARS INC ↗
  • Who funds DOMESTIC WORKERS UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds Hutchinson River Restoration Project ↗
  • Who funds THE STORY COLLIDER INC ↗
  • Who funds STITCH BUFFALO INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta IncGA12.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Seedtime Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Seedtime Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Seedtime Fund Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Seedtime Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Seedtime’s filings →

    More from the funding graph