Skip to content

· Private foundation

Seed for the Sower Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$59k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$214kInternational$133kEducation$33kFood & Nutrition$28kYouth Development$21kHuman Services$17kHealth$16kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $48k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$9k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Involved International$36,000
Kingdom Kids Bible Study$12,000
Tree Top Kids$5,000
Christian Life Assembly of God Inc$3,000
Global University$2,000
Aunty Agnes Childrens Shelter$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 35% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Uttermost International: $5k → 9%Free International: $4k → 13%Neighbors Inc: $3k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
MI
NV
WY
IA
CO
MO
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$337k · 16 repeat orgs$150k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +78% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
40

Total granted

$337k
$149k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+6%

Still filing today

50%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionInternationalHuman ServicesEducationHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • II
    INVOLVED INTERNATIONAL INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $80k · revenue +79%
  • FM
    FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $15k · revenue +42%
  • WM
    World Missions Today
    2× · 2022–2023 · $14k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • AG
    AGWM - Georgia Radio Ministry
    one grant, 2020 · $24k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • KA
    Kenya AoG Extension Program
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Needs

International needs has the vision to transform lives and change communities by helping christian nationals serve both god and neighbor within their own countries.

—
2
International Impact Ministries in
Religion
3
Vision International Missions

To propagate the gospel of jesus christ; to examine candidates and appoint missionaries. to endorse missionary programs according to standards set forth in the new testament, to establish churches, church schools & mission societies in…

Religion
4
United Saints Worldwide

United Saints is committed to taking the Gospel to both major cities and the most remote regionsreaching places like the Amazon Jungle and beyondwith the power and love of Jesus.

Religion
5
Harvesters International Ministries

Partnering with Indigenous Leaders to Spread the Gospel, Serve Others, and Build Community

Religion
6
Kingdom Investment International Inc

Kingdom Investment works among the poor and oppressed to bear witness to the good news of the Kingdom of God that results in holistic transformation through the power of the Holy Spirit.

Religion
7
Fruitful Missions
Religion
8
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
9
Partnership for Indigenous Peoples -Pipes - International

We are a global Christian organization committed to partnering with indigenous peoples, local churches, and community-based organizations to make disciples of Jesus Christ and help end extreme poverty. We serve indigenous pygmies,…

International
10
Going Beyond Missions

Train Gods people to live out a missionary lifestyle in their daily lives to obey the Great Commission. Build many mission teams and send the teams to UUPG Unreached Unengaged Peoples Group and make 10% of the world population disciples of…

Religion
11
Oceans of Mercy

Missionary work in the nation of India

Religion
12
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tree Top Kids. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Kingdom Kids Bible Study: $72,000 · OtherKingdom Kids Bible StudyGLOBAL UNIVERSITY: $27,402 · OtherGLOBAL UNIVERSITYAGWM - Georgia Radio Ministry: $23,539 · OtherAGWM - Georgia Radio MinistryVOICE OF THE MARTYRS INC: $12,000 · OtherTrinity Tabernacle Church: $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · Other+39 more: $134,849 · Other+39 moreINVOLVED INTERNATIONAL INC: $80,000 · ReligionINVOLVED INTERNATIONAL I…World Missions Today: $14,000 · ReligionWorld Missions TodaySAMARITAN'S PURSE: $13,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSELOVE A CHILD INC: $20,000 · InternationalLOVE A CHIL…FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $15,000 · InternationalFEED MY STA…Mercy Ships International: $8,000 · InternationalMercy Ships…CONVOY OF HOPE: $5,000 · InternationalCONVOY OF H…TREE TOP KIDS: $21,000 · EducationUPPER IOWA UNIVERSITY: $1,000 · EducationST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $12,000 · HealthUTTERMOST INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 · Human ServicesF R E E INTERNATIONAL INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORS INC: $2,500 · Human Services
Other$291,790Religion$107,000International$48,000Education$22,000Health$12,000Human Services$11,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINVOLVED INTERNATIONAL INC: $80,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetTREE TOP KIDS: $21,000 over 5y, 2.7% of budgetLOVE A CHILD INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWorld Missions Today: $14,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $13,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $12,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Ships International: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONVOY OF HOPE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUTTERMOST INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetF R E E INTERNATIONAL INC: $4,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSTEIGER INTERNATIONAL LIMITED: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEIGHBORS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUPPER IOWA UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INVOLVED INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds TREE TOP KIDS ↗
  • Who funds LOVE A CHILD INC ↗
  • Who funds FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds World Missions Today ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗
  • Who funds CONVOY OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds UTTERMOST INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds F R E E INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds STEIGER INTERNATIONAL LIMITED ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Seed for the Sower Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Seed for the Sower Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Love a Child Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Seed for the Sower’s filings →

More from the funding graph