· Private foundation
Scp Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $255k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $385k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TRANSHEALTH | $75,000 |
| MINDFUL BIRTHNG AND PARENTING FOUNDATION | $60,000 |
| CISA | $50,000 |
| TONI'S KITCHEN | $50,000 |
| HRDC | $50,000 |
| HISTORIC NORTHAMPTON | $50,000 |
| GROW FOOD NORTHAMPTON | $50,000 |
| TREEHOUSE | $35,000 |
| MGB COOLEY DICKINSON HOSPITAL | $25,000 |
| NAMI METRO SUBURBAN | $25,000 |
| GREEN CITY MARKET LLC | $25,000 |
| GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS | $25,000 |
| SHARE FOOD SHARE LOVE FOOD PANTRY | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 84% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +11% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
19 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $255k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GFGROW FOOD NORTHAMPTON INC2× · 2024–2025 · $60k · revenue +19%
- CGCHICAGO'S GREEN CITY MARKET PROGRAM3× · 2023–2025 · $50k · revenue +2%
- NMNAMI METRO-SUBURBAN INC3× · 2023–2025 · $50k · revenue +58%
Funded once
- CICOMMUNITY INVOLVED IN SUSTAINING AGRICULTURE INCone grant, 2024 · $35k · revenue 0%
- SJST JOHN'Sone grant, 2024 · $25k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Education and Research
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Trustees of Reservations and the most unlike its peers is Tapestry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RIDER UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds TRANSHEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds GROW FOOD NORTHAMPTON INC ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO'S GREEN CITY MARKET PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds HISTORIC NORTHAMPTON INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI METRO-SUBURBAN INC ↗
- Who funds TREEHOUSE ↗
- Who funds Carnegie Mellon University ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY INVOLVED IN SUSTAINING AGRICULTURE INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
- Who funds Natural Lands Trust Inc ↗
- Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS ↗
- Who funds THE MORRIS MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds SHARE FOOD SHARE LOVE FOOD PANTRY ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN DOMINION HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds TAPESTRY INC ↗
- Who funds CANCER CONNECTION INC ↗
- Who funds RADIO WORKSHOP US INC ↗
- Who funds REFUGEEONE ↗
- Who funds WORCESTER HISTORICAL MUSEUM ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Florence Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Easthampton Savings Bank Foundation Inc · The Beveridge Family Foundation · Community Foundation of Western Massachusetts · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Scp Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Community Involved in Sustaining Agriculture Inc — 35% of income from government
- Grow Food Northampton Inc — 25% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- The Morris Museum Inc — 7% of income from government
- Worcester Historical Museum — 5% of income from government
- The Trustees of Reservations — 2% of income from government
- Rider University — 1% of income from government
- Transhealth Inc — 0% of income from government
- Historic Northampton Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Scp Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Scp Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.