Skip to content

Wisconsin · Private foundation

Scott & Kathryn Happ Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$548k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
16
Grants FY2025
16
Organizations funded FY2024
38%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$250,000
Organizations funded a year
6 to 16
FY2021 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
8
Total assets, FY2025
$15M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 38% of the organizations Scott & Kathryn Happ Foundation Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 2% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
HealthAnimalsHousing & ShelterInternationalHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving15$523k33%
FY202416$493k38%
FY202314$467k50%
FY202212$406k50%
FY20216$148kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Human Services$1.0MEducation$556kHealth$319kAnimals$57kCommunity Improvement$55kRecreation & Sports$46kPhilanthropy$25kArts & Culture$6kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MT
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
CO
VA
NC
DC
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Meta House Inc$1,010,00053%
University of Wisconsin Foundation$500,00050%
Lynn Sage Breast Cancer Foundation$225,00034%
Wisconsin Humane Society$47,50050%
American Heart Association Inc$35,00020%
National Ramah Commission Inc$30,00030%
Blood Cancer United Inc$15,40040%
Camp Ramah in Wisconsin Inc$10,0002n/a
National Brain Tumor Society Inc$7,41640%
Humane World for Animals Inc$7,00020%
Show all 22 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 8 recipients with no EIN on record ($115k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Scott & Kathryn Happ Foundation Inc supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMeta House Inc: $1,010,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetUniversity of Wisconsin Foundation: $500,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLynn Sage Breast Cancer Foundation: $225,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetWisconsin Humane Society: $47,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNational Ramah Commission Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBlood Cancer United Inc: $15,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNational Brain Tumor Society Inc: $7,416 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Friendship Bridge: $5,560 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCitizens United for Research in Epilepsy: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWomen for Macc Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetNext Door Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $2,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMarch of Dimes Inc: $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHunger Task Force Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetManna Food Bank Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 18.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Scott & Kathryn Happ Foundation Inc with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Scott & Kathryn Happ Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Scott & Kathryn Happ Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Scott & Kathryn Happ Foundation Inc

How much does Scott & Kathryn Happ Foundation Inc give?
Scott & Kathryn Happ Foundation Inc reported 16 grants totaling $547,954 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 6 and 16 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2024.
What does Scott & Kathryn Happ Foundation Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2025, its largest causes are Human Services (48%), Education (27%), Health (15%).
Who are Scott & Kathryn Happ Foundation Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2025: Meta House Inc ($1.0M), University of Wisconsin Foundation ($500k), Lynn Sage Breast Cancer Foundation ($225k).
Does Scott & Kathryn Happ Foundation Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 38% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Scott & Kathryn Happ Foundation Inc accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Scott & Kathryn Happ Foundation Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include National Philanthropic Trust, American Endowment Foundation, Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program.
Where is Scott & Kathryn Happ Foundation Inc based?
Scott & Kathryn Happ Foundation Inc is based in WI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Scott & Kathryn Happ’s filings →

More from the funding graph